Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Andy84]

Liverpool will think they need Isak.  We should be making them pay an absolute fortune. £150 million to start negotiations 

[duo]

40 minutes ago, gdm said:

Does make me laugh how some people just completely discredit journalists because it doesn’t suit their thinking. If Hope came out and said Isak is staying and new contract is imminent no one is saying “it’s hope he doesn’t have a clue”. He might not be the best journalist but he does get a lot right 

 

 

 

I don't discredit - I just don't treat it as fact.

[OpenC]

Football journalism in 2025 is like weather forecasts, people just keep looking until they find one that says what they want it to say

[gdm]

3 minutes ago, duo said:

I don't discredit - I just don't treat it as fact.

Would be silly if you did. 

[Coffee_Johnny]

51 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

Before anyone goes throwing their phone maybe watch this first. Think you'll feel a bit better.

 

 

Looked shit. And wtf is going on font wise on their jerseys? Also looks shit. 

[Kid Icarus]

5 minutes ago, OpenC said:

Football journalism in 2025 is like weather forecasts, people just keep looking until they find one that says what they want it to say

Or finding out that the Met Office are being paid by big cloud to shill for them

 

 

Edited August 3, 2025 by Kid Icarus

[duo]

3 hours ago, Ronson333 said:

Really good video this

 

 

Nailed it - really good video - thanks for posting.  If you haven't seen it - defo worth a watch. 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2025 by duo

[gdm]

From Caulkin 

 

 

not sure that makes much sense 

[Hovagod]

Just now, gdm said:

From Caulkin 

 

 

not sure that makes much sense 

They tried.

[Rocker]

48 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Or finding out that the Met Office are being paid by big cloud to shill for them

 

 

 

 

North Shields ONLY wants rain.

[TRon]

He's returning to training this week, this is a clear sign for me that he's left the door open to playing at Newcastle this season. If he goes it will only be because we are ok with it. 

[BlazeT44]

I went out with a friend of mine last night for a drink. We talked football and Isak came up. I'll relay a hypothetical question of his here.

 

"Would you take £110m (original offer) + Nunez for Isak?"

 

[duo]

1 minute ago, BlazeT44 said:

I went out with a friend of mine last night for a drink. We talked football and Isak came up. I'll relay a hypothetical question of his here.

 

"Would you take £110m (original offer) + Nunez for Isak?"

 

Nope - Isak is irreplaceable 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2025 by duo

[KingArthur]

1 minute ago, BlazeT44 said:

I went out with a friend of mine last night for a drink. We talked football and Isak came up. I'll relay a hypothetical question of his here.

 

"Would you take £110m (original offer) + Nunez for Isak?"

 

No. Nunez would not be a starter here 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2025 by KingArthur

[STM]

2 minutes ago, BlazeT44 said:

I went out with a friend of mine last night for a drink. We talked football and Isak came up. I'll relay a hypothetical question of his here.

 

"Would you take £110m (original offer) + Nunez for Isak?"

 

 

140 + Nunez on Loan maybe.

 

120 with Harvey Elliot, would be a better shout.

[CPL]

No chance. 

[KingArthur]

1 minute ago, STM said:

 

140 + Nunez on Loan maybe.

 

120 with Harvey Elliot, would be a better shout.

Again this fking Elliott stuff. He is not a starter here and not suitable for Howe’s football. Why would we take less money to get a bench warmer?

[TheBrownBottle]

4 minutes ago, BlazeT44 said:

I went out with a friend of mine last night for a drink. We talked football and Isak came up. I'll relay a hypothetical question of his here.

 

"Would you take £110m (original offer) + Nunez for Isak?"

 

I think that doesn’t equate to £150m, so no

[BlazeT44]

Just now, TheBrownBottle said:

I think that doesn’t equate to £150m, so no

 

Interesting. His argument was Nunez would probably fetch £50m, especially from Saudi.

 

I said I wouldn't, based on the fact Nunez wouldn't be my replacement.

 

But I would want £160m

[gdm]

8 minutes ago, TRon said:

He's returning to training this week, this is a clear sign for me that he's left the door open to playing at Newcastle this season. If he goes it will only be because we are ok with it. 

He’s due to return to training. Let’s see if he turns up. I think he will but don’t think it’s really an indicator wether hes staying or not 

[London Mag]

8 minutes ago, BlazeT44 said:

I went out with a friend of mine last night for a drink. We talked football and Isak came up. I'll relay a hypothetical question of his here.

 

"Would you take £110m (original offer) + Nunez for Isak?"

 

It's more like £150mill for Isak or £175mill plus donkey Nunez

[Jewel]

1 minute ago, BlazeT44 said:

 

Interesting. His argument was Nunez would probably fetch £50m, especially from Saudi.

 

I said I wouldn't, based on the fact Nunez wouldn't be my replacement.

 

But I would want £160m

Whatever they get from Saudi, they should add that onto their original bid for Isak.

 

So if they get 60m for Nunez, that should work out to 110m + 60m = 170m

[Kimbo]

8 minutes ago, BlazeT44 said:

I went out with a friend of mine last night for a drink. We talked football and Isak came up. I'll relay a hypothetical question of his here.

 

"Would you take £110m (original offer) + Nunez for Isak?"

 

Our Saudi friends are going to give them a stupid fee for Nunez so it would never happen.

 

Hypothetically though, I’d take Nunez as a Wilson replacement, so that would mean dropping our interest in Wissa, and we would still need an Isak replacement. I’d consider it but I wouldn’t be biting their hand off.

[Gawalls]

1 hour ago, OpenC said:

Football journalism in 2025 is like weather forecasts, people just keep looking until they find one that says what they want it to say

It’s worse in forums - using the same analogy on forums people look for that same forecast just to say “it is 100% going to be 35 degrees today, bbc said so and ITV are wankers and wrong” just for others to say “no mate - ITV are correct, BBC haven’t a clue so it’s going to rain”. None of us, including most online journalists don’t know - only difference between us is the journalists probably don’t care.

[nufc123]

Not buying that. How do they save face with a 110m bid?