Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Sibierski]

Kane went for £100m with 12 months left. It should be £150m this summer, £135m January, or £115m next summer. 

[TheBrownBottle]

1 hour ago, gbandit said:

Think people also need to understand we’ll never ever have a player who’s as big of a cunt as this lad again, not even close 

Did anyone have a hint before June that the lad had even a little bit of a cunt in him, never mind what he’s shown himself to be?

 

We absolutely could sign someone like this again, the ‘no dickheads policy’ for transfers absolutely didn’t pick this up, nor did a single one of us think he was capable of acting like this.

[Elric]

1 hour ago, Andy84 said:

Quite a short time left for a British record transfer. Where are respectful FC?

 

Respectfully briefing their various client journalists for the next round of classy undermining tactics. 

 

Oh, and busy being absolute cunts, obvs. 

[madras]

6 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Did anyone have a hint before June that the lad had even a little bit of a cunt in him, never mind what he’s shown himself to be?

 

We absolutely could sign someone like this again, the ‘no dickheads policy’ for transfers absolutely didn’t pick this up, nor did a single one of us think he was capable of acting like this.

There was an inkling. Don't think people warmed to him the way they did Tonali, Bruno etc and he never seemed as invested as the rest.

[GEFAFWISP]

4 minutes ago, Elric said:

 

Respectfully briefing their various client journalists for the next round of classy undermining tactics. 

 

Oh, and busy being respectful cunts, obvs. 

Fyp

[wfmk2]

Saudi transfer window closes on 10th September, so maybe we have a plan B up our sleeves?

[TheBrownBottle]

4 minutes ago, madras said:

There was an inkling. Don't think people warmed to him the way they did Tonali, Bruno etc and he never seemed as invested as the rest.

I’d be surprised if there’s a single post before June which suggests that what has happened was liable or likely to occur due to questions around Isak’s character - happy to be wrong

[Hhtoon]

The 150m is just standard negotiating. If we'd said 130m they'd have offered us 110m....oh wait 

[relámpago blanco]

1 minute ago, Hhtoon said:

The 150m is just standard negotiating. If we'd said 130m they'd have offered us 110m....oh wait 

Should have said 175 then

[Interpolic]

£150m is what he was worth and still should be imo, at least. He's proven himself to be one of the top 2 strikers in the top league in the world, arguably the best above Haaland tbh. "Mbappe money" is whatever would tempt Real Madrid, which is likely £250m+.

 

 

Edited August 30, 2025 by Interpolic

[Optimistic Nut]

Sorry if Giggs. Don't think it was the answer the host was expecting.

 

 

 

 

[The Fountain]

Can anybody hoy a link up of the agent who rinsed Isak and Liverpool?

[The Fountain]

No need it is the one above 🤣

[gbandit]

23 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Did anyone have a hint before June that the lad had even a little bit of a cunt in him, never mind what he’s shown himself to be?

 

We absolutely could sign someone like this again, the ‘no dickheads policy’ for transfers absolutely didn’t pick this up, nor did a single one of us think he was capable of acting like this.

You can sign someone and not know what their character is like, of course you can. I’m not denying that, people can be unpredictable. What I can say with certainty is that it’ll never happen like this again because there isn’t a bigger cunt in football than Isak

[madras]

10 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

I’d be surprised if there’s a single post before June which suggests that what has happened was liable or likely to occur due to questions around Isak’s character - happy to be wrong

No not that far, no that it was likely to happen....... but if it was it would be him or Gordon. Gordon due to the history.

[Yorkie]

Interesting insight from that agent. I haven't reached blood-boiling hate levels towards Isak cos the whole thing has always seemed incredibly weird and agent-driven in the first place. Clearly he's still an arsehole.

[Cf]

1 hour ago, Sibierski said:

Kane went for £100m with 12 months left. It should be £150m this summer, £135m January, or £115m next summer. 

 

Kane was sold 2 years ago so before some major price inflation, had 1 year left on his contract, and was sold abroad not to another PL club. 

 

On that basis £115m next summer would be an absolute piss take. 

[Stottie]

While other teams have kept toxic players before, I don't think there has ever been anything like the chorus in the media claiming the selling club must sell and that the buying club deserves or essentially already owns the player, and can dictate the price to one barely higher than a fee the buying club paid very recently for a clearly inferior player.

 

It is one thing for mad keen Liverpool fans to think mad thoughts, but the media should not cheer them on. Of course thanks to Twitter and cunts like Romano, the chorus is much louder than it has ever been before.

 

Based on what Sky Andrew says, a club should not stagger agent payments so that they end long before the player's contract. It means the agent with hawk around the player long before the contract is up to give the agent another payday. This is not good for football.

 

We all assume (naturally) that Liverpool want and need Isak, but on the off chance they're not that bothered, they have got to massively obstruct NUFC as a rival business, including weakening our lineup when we played them, at no cost or the low cost of getting Romano etc. to stir shit up.

[FloydianMag]

 

[Poon Raccoon]

Woltemade who Bayern were after suddenly comes to us.

 

Isak to Bayern ?

 

Guaranteed to win titles and play Champs League every year.

 

Newcastle don’t want to sell to another Prem side especially the bin dippers.

 

Win win, Isak gets his move, we fuck him off.

 

Have Newcastle done a deal here ?

 

Maybe looking into it too much.

[gdm]

what a cunt 

[Chris_R]

16 minutes ago, Cf said:

 

Kane was sold 2 years ago so before some major price inflation, had 1 year left on his contract, and was sold abroad not to another PL club. 

 

On that basis £115m next summer would be an absolute piss take. 

 

Plus Kane was or was very close to being 30.

 

Based on Kane, £150m is cheap for a 25 year old with 3 years left on his contract. And it's probably still cheap for a 26 year old with 2 years left.

[Stottie]

14 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Interesting insight from that agent. I haven't reached blood-boiling hate levels towards Isak cos the whole thing has always seemed incredibly weird and agent-driven in the first place. Clearly he's still an arsehole.

All we've heard has come from Romano etc. (Isak's agent) and whoever does Isak's socials (likely Isak's agent or a pawn of him). The player has remained in the shadows, probably wisely given the snide way this is being done.

 

[Skeletor]

1 minute ago, gdm said:

what a cunt 

 

[Stottie]

2 minutes ago, gdm said:

what a cunt 

Why would a manager refer people to an online bullshitter for transfer news? The classic (and correct) manager refrain is "don't believe everything you read".

 

Is it because the online bullshitter in question never writes anything detrimental to Liverpool Football Club?