Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He was fine at the top of a front three in Spain. A large part of the problem is that the link up with our wingers isn't there yet. Promising stuff from him and ASM, but it'll be a combination of lack of playing time and him being far better than anyone who plays alongside him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

He seemed absolutely fine in the few games he had there before the injury when he first joined I thought? Particularly against Liverpool away.

 

I think against a team like Liverpool where we sit back and look to hit them on the break, he's fine as a lone striker. He has room to roam, find channels to run and use his pace.

 

But against sides who sit deep, he's struggled to get into the games, and usually just gets dominated physically.

Link to post
Share on other sites

                          Isak

     Gordon                            ASM

                        Bruno

            Beg Jow       Longstaff

 

Targett      Botman     Schar    Trippier

 

                           Pope

 

Worth a try?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been an advocate of it in the past but I now struggle to see a point in moving our best player from his current position.

 

We've seen in the past three league games how we struggle to build from the back when he isn't the link between defence and midfield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon we should use the remaining games to start Isak, if fit. 

 

The investment of potentially dropping Wilson to the sub role should begin to pay off next season when Isak is full bedded it has a good chunk of games in his locker. 

 

Sad for Wilson, but we can't start next season still saying that Isak needs time. 

 

 

Edited by Weezertron

Link to post
Share on other sites

He absolutely needs consistent playing time now; whether as a striker, wide forward, or #10. 

 

I think we can get away with him & Wilson as a pairing against a lot of teams, tbh. Probs not against the best possession sides but that's where you can play him as the striker or move him to a wider role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isak is a completely different type of forward to Wilson, so the front three might need a bit of time to develop cohesion.

 

That said ASM and Isak already seem to have a bit of an understanding. Get Targett in for Burn and Isak in for Wilson and those two will do damage. 

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone shouted for Bruno to start when he first came here but Eddie bedded him in very slowly and it paid off. He's doing the same with Isak and bearing in mind the injury that Isak had he seems to be taking real care over it. PL will be a big step up physically for him but I like what I've seen so far 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the reason may be that the front three as a whole will need adjusting. Wilson will stay high up the pitch and engage the centre backs. Isak will drop off into spaces and run at defenders. He'll need payers to run beyond him and link up. We've no doubt worked on this on the training ground though. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Part of the reason may be that the front three as a whole will need adjusting. Wilson will stay high up the pitch and engage the centre backs. Isak will drop off into spaces and run at defenders. He'll need payers to run beyond him and link up. We've no doubt worked on this on the training ground though. 

 

 

I really like the Isak-Wilson option for some games. It feels like it makes a lot of sense with our current predictability - Isak has the game to both drop into gaps and turn, help create overloads out wide, and make runs beyond defenders while Wilson occupies central space. I imagine there's some concern about defensive shape/gaps starting them both but if you have a midfield of Almiron/Bruno/Joe/Gordon behind them then that's lots of coverage & work rate. 

 

 

Edited by Gallowgate Toon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where on the field does he work best? Free role at OMC? Do you dare to have him as a lone striker if he is out on the right, left or downfield and picks up the ball, 50% of the match?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He'd be fine as a lone striker if you had other players who could float, occupy the space he leaves and link up with him. I'm not sure we do at this moment in time, but we've got to give him a go sooner rather than later. 

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I think about it, the more I think it might be worth persisting with Wilson just for now - but specifically because he and Isak haven't started together yet. Surely, if they're both fully fit (or as fit as they are ever likely to be, in Wilson's case), we should give them a fair crack as a partnership? Besides, Isak has been most effective when played deeper, debut aside. 

 

                           Pope

 

Trippier    Schar        Botman    Targett

 

                Bruno        Joelinton

 

Gordon               Isak                   Maxi

 

                         Wilson

 

Surely to God there's goals in that front four? I mean that whole team on paper looks really, really good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yorkie said:

The more I think about it, the more I think it might be worth persisting with Wilson just for now - but specifically because he and Isak haven't started together yet. Surely, if they're both fully fit (or as fit as they are ever likely to be, in Wilson's case), we should give them a fair crack as a partnership? Besides, Isak has been most effective when played deeper, debut aside. 

 

                           Pope

 

Trippier    Schar        Botman    Targett

 

                Bruno        Joelinton

 

Gordon               Isak                   Maxi

 

                         Wilson

 

Surely to God there's goals in that front four? I mean that whole team on paper looks really, really good. 

 

That team looks great tbf. Very much looking forward to seeing Targett back behind Maxi. Think it'll transform us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, jackyboy said:

Everyone shouted for Bruno to start when he first came here but Eddie bedded him in very slowly and it paid off. He's doing the same with Isak and bearing in mind the injury that Isak had he seems to be taking real care over it. PL will be a big step up physically for him but I like what I've seen so far 

 

I think the context is hugely different though, we signed Bruno when deep in a relegation battle and the form of the team massively improved without him in the starting lineup so there was no need to change it. Once he finally got his first start at Southampton he was in the first XI ever since.

 

We're chasing Europe now and the goals have dried up post WC. So have Wilson's performances by a long chalk. Isak returned to full training on the 2nd January, it's now March and yet he's only started twice. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...