Bizza Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Lerl Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 The hilarity of this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Love how smily the ref is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Holy shit that penalty in Madrid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) Erm Kane can't be offside, he's behind the player who heads it, and the ball goes backwards, it only goes forward after it hits the defender. That is an utterly ludicrous decision. Edited October 26, 2022 by Bimpy474 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Just now, Bimpy474 said: Erm Kane can't be offside, he's behind the player who heads it, and the ball goes backwards, it only goes forward after it hits the defender. That is an utterly ludicrous decision. He's not behind the ball and it doesn;t mater that the ball went backwards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Just now, Bimpy474 said: Erm her can't be offside, he's behind the player who heads it, and the ball goes backwards, it only goes forward after it hits the defender. That is an utterly ludicrous decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) I can't understand the lines they put out for the offside at the end. They used the defensive line as the defenders left foot but surely it should go off the actual football as if Kabe is behind that then he's onside? Confusing as fuck that one.... Edit - Just saw the 'still' shot on that picture above and they did go off the ball not the defender. Probably correct decision I guess... Edited October 26, 2022 by Pokerprince2004 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Oh well. What a shame. Never mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, joeyt said: He's not behind the ball and it doesn;t mater that the ball went backwards He's level. This has to stop, as hilarious as it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Pokerprince2004 said: I can't understand the lines they put out for the offside at the end. They used the defensive line as the defenders left foot but surely it should go off the actual football as if Kabe is behind that then he's onside? Confusing as fuck that one.... Think they have based it on Kane's foot being ahead of the ball at the moment it's headed across. So technically correct. Edited October 26, 2022 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 He's behind the ball for me, and if he is then the ball going backwards, even forwards doesn't matter. I get the lines say otherwise, but there has to be a margin error as the player heads it. In that still the ball is moving away from the player heading it, just my opinion, that's the margin of error that should go with the attacking team, especially if it takes 3 minutes to decide. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPL Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 As funny as that is, that is a disgraceful decision. No way can they judge the line of the ball from that. I'd be fuming if that was us. Makes it great for the last set of fixtures. One game shoot out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Just now, Bimpy474 said: He's behind the ball for me, and if he is then the ball going backwards, even forwards doesn't matter. I get the lines say otherwise, but there has to be a margin error as the player heads it. In that still the ball is moving away from the player heading it, just my opinion, that's the margin of error that should go with the attacking team, especially if it takes 3 minutes to decide. The ball going backwards or forwards doesn't matter anyway for any offsides Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPL Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Also with those images. It is so easy to manipulate it to which ever decision you want. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 I mean I don't mind today but VAR is fucked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samptime29 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Thought it was a harsh call against Spurs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, joeyt said: The ball going backwards or forwards doesn't matter anyway for any offsides When i went through the course to qualify as a ref, honestly though you'll be amazed at the video's they show you. I sat there arguing that it was madness some of the vids they showed, but the complete disregard for any opinion to the contrary was an eye opener. Basically it's never ever wrong, or should that be they are never wrong, no matter what players or managers, or even actual officials think. And that attitude is why it's the mess it is, just total arrogance. Edited October 26, 2022 by Bimpy474 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 9 minutes ago, CPL said: As funny as that is, that is a disgraceful decision. No way can they judge the line of the ball from that. I'd be fuming if that was us. Makes it great for the last set of fixtures. One game shoot out. You don’t need to judge the line of the ball for an offside Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Also on that picture, they measure Kane most forward point he can legally score with as the line to judge him offside, yet don't do that with the player playing him the ball, seems a tad unfair like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, tgarve said: You don’t need to judge the line of the ball for an offside I think you do, don't you? To be in an offside position, the player has to be ahead of both the second last opponent and the ball. Kane was clearly behind the ball. I can't believe that the VAR official made such an elementary mistake though. Maybe Kane was offside when the cross went in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, Bimpy474 said: Also on that picture, they measure Kane most forward point he can legally score with as the line to judge him offside, yet don't do that with the player playing him the ball, seems a tad unfair like. Well they're going from where the ball is and not Emerson's right foot which is correct Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 1 minute ago, joeyt said: Well they're going from where the ball is and not Emerson's right foot which is correct Aye that's correct, but Kane scored with his right foot which in the pic, his right foot is onside. My point is as i said above, they're measuring it from Kane's left knee. I know that's being pedantic but, why do they measure Kane from his most forward scoring point, and measure Emerson from the balls point of contact on him ? For me, measure both players from their most legal forward point. Surely you can see where I'm coming from ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 4 minutes ago, Bimpy474 said: Aye that's correct, but Kane scored with his right foot which in the pic, his right foot is onside. My point is as i said above, they're measuring it from Kane's left knee. I know that's being pedantic but, why do they measure Kane from his most forward scoring point, and measure Emerson from the balls point of contact on him ? For me, measure both players from their most legal forward point. Surely you can see where I'm coming from ? Because it’s where the ball is, it has nothing to do with Emerson’s body? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 24 minutes ago, Cronky said: I think you do, don't you? To be in an offside position, the player has to be ahead of both the second last opponent and the ball. Kane was clearly behind the ball. I can't believe that the VAR official made such an elementary mistake though. Maybe Kane was offside when the cross went in? He wasn’t behind the ball??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now