Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Stifler said:

I’ve got to say, I have a dislike of Bournemouth that I shouldn’t.

 

Small club came up and did things the right way.

Plucky underdogs.

Howe, and others connections.

 

I just can’t seem to stand them to be honest. Everyone seems to be wishing them well, and liking them shake things up. I just want them to fuck off back down the leagues to be honest, and I can’t even tell you why.

 

Personally, I don't like that there is a group of clubs with tiny support that are successful mostly due to being located in places that are desirable for players to live, which have pushed out well supported northern clubs. I don't think they're actually plucky underdogs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

Personally, I don't like that there is a group of clubs with tiny support that are successful mostly due to being located in places that are desirable for players to live, which have pushed out well supported northern clubs. I don't think they're actually plucky underdogs.

I think part of that is my thinking as well.

Bournemouth isn’t a footballing hotbed.

2 of their season ticket holders are Harry Redknapp, and Souness, and because they both retired there.

 

They could get into Europe, and win the cup and I feel a few years down the line, absolutely no one would give a fuck about them again. I don’t think they’ll ever be able to significantly increase their fanbase.

I just don’t think the South Coast is a footballing hotbed, the same sort of dislike applies to Brighton. Plymouth aside, I have started to hate all the South Coast clubs. With Plymouth, I like them for how they treated us when we got promoted as Champions and they got relegated, and I can understand how their region is overlooked and generally rather poor, and even with these considerations, I don’t think Plymouth can become much bigger than what they are now.

 

It’s very similar to the Rugby clubs who came up and stole a place in the Premier League, Wigan and Reading, I’m looking at you two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

Personally, I don't like that there is a group of clubs with tiny support that are successful mostly due to being located in places that are desirable for players to live, which have pushed out well supported northern clubs. I don't think they're actually plucky underdogs.


This is where I am.

 

Brentford, Fulham, Palace, Brighton, Bournemouth.

 

All benefit massively from their location.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sima said:

This is where I am.

 

Brentford, Fulham, Palace, Brighton, Bournemouth.

 

All benefit massively from their location.

You could argue Spurs and Arsenal as well.

 

Spurs wouldn’t be as big as they are if they weren’t located in London.

Arsenal moved out of an area that they shared with Charlton, Millwall, Crystal Palace, and to a lesser extent West Ham. They moved into an area that they only shared with Spurs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sima said:

Cook did that half a dozen times to Gordon at our place, as soon as he touches Grealish - Yellow.


Was just saying that to my mate. Basically we had the wrong type of ref when we played Bournemouth.

 

Fair play still to Bournemouth of course their finishing was excellent on the day. The ref however suited their tactical fouling on the day.

 

Small margins.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 54 said:

For how good Bournemouth where in the first half, they have been equally shit in this second. Looks like their legs have gone.


Funny how subbing a LB at HT can make such a big difference. Maybe Pardew was ahead of his time… :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, LFEE said:


Funny how subbing a LB at HT can make such a big difference. Maybe Pardew was ahead of his time… :lol:

 

The set penis winning a cup completely rehabs his legacy :pardsbeard:

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LFEE said:


Was just saying that to my mate. Basically we had the wrong type of ref when we played Bournemouth.

 

Fair play still to Bournemouth of course their finishing was excellent on the day. The ref however suited their tactical fouling on the day.

 

Small margins.

 

They were much better than us and deserved to win

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

Personally, I don't like that there is a group of clubs with tiny support that are successful mostly due to being located in places that are desirable for players to live, which have pushed out well supported northern clubs. I don't think they're actually plucky underdogs.

My sentiments exactly. No fans, no soul, no decent song book, just the luck of geography. Brighton, Bournemouth, Brentford - they’re all “find and replace” clubs with each other’s names and the same story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

really want city to win the cup.

just my own "small club" mentality.

dont want any of the shine taken off our cup win because another non-sky 6 has won the fa cup.

smalltime, i know.

 

 

Edited by huss9

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Stifler said:

You could argue Spurs and Arsenal as well.

 

Spurs wouldn’t be as big as they are if they weren’t located in London.

Arsenal moved out of an area that they shared with Charlton, Millwall, Crystal Palace, and to a lesser extent West Ham. They moved into an area that they only shared with Spurs.

Arsenal being a London club who can pay higher salary was a factor that they could lure herbert Chapman to join their relegation threatened club, dumping his title winning squad in small huddersfield.

 

These lot now lecture about "financial doping"

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joeyt said:

 

They were much better than us and deserved to win


Not disagreeing. Just merely pointing out the fine margins in games. A different ref and us getting more fouls would’ve made a difference.

 

Actually just holding on to 1-1 until HT could’ve been enough. Reshape re group. However wasn’t to be and they scored a second just before HT.

 

Ran out worthy winners but everything they hit felt it went in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, healthyaddiction said:

That Nico O'Reilly is left footed, a big unit and classy on the ball. Would like nice on the right hand side for us.


He’s a holding midfielder I think. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, midds said:

So where does that leave 6th and 7th places then? Assuming City and Forest finish top 5, would both 6th and 7th be Europa or just 6th?

It all depends on who wins the FA Cup.

If whoever wins it, already qualified for Europe, then it will drop down a place in the league, to 7th (assuming England get the extra Champions League place).

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stifler said:

It all depends on who wins the FA Cup.

If whoever wins it, already qualified for Europe, then it will drop down a place in the league, to 7th (assuming England get the extra Champions League place).

Yeah, I meant if City or Forest finish top 5, and either win the cup, it's EL for 6th and 7th? 

 

Didn't make it clear :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

Personally, I don't like that there is a group of clubs with tiny support that are successful mostly due to being located in places that are desirable for players to live, which have pushed out well supported northern clubs. I don't think they're actually plucky underdogs.

 

Tend to agree. Location doesn't just attract players, but it attracts ownership groups in the first place. Don't get me wrong you can't really begrudge clubs being well ran but it does make the league a bit boring.

 

The same imbalance is happening in Italy (although the north/South divide is flipped). Small northern teams like Como, Venezia, Monza being bought out because of their location and cultural cache while bigger clubs in poorer regions flounder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, St. Maximin said:

Sorry I just can’t get why people want to see City win stuff [emoji38]

 

It’s so boring and we’ve already had our big win. Surely football goes beyond just what is supposedly good for us (and I’m not sure it makes a difference anyway). You look at how impressive those scenes were yesterday and so many fans of other clubs have been genuinely happy for us and enjoyed seeing teams win stuff fir the first time in many years, fans going crazy etc. 

 

Yeah you won’t see any of that with City. Just the same old. 

Wouldnt mind it for forest or if Bournemouth had won

But fuck palace and fuck villa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...