NE27 Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 No touch whatsoever? Unless the high foot is enough? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizza Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 That's not a penalty ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBuzzcocks Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 VAR can’t make their mind up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Ah, ref initially gave a pen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Standard of reffing is abhorrent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo2 Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Mental. They didn't give the pen at the time, 30 seconds later. Then it's getting reviewed to overturn? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Just now, Sima said: Ah, ref initially gave a pen. Mind, VAR wouldn't say peep at Anfield. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris L Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Didn’t touch him. But would be classed as high boot and with it been near head. Can see why they checking. Seen freekicks and even yellow cards for similar Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 If its deemed high foot, it should be a pen. Contact is irrelevant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizza Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 No foul, get in the VAR! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenC Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 rtg all adamant it wasn't a penalty to be fair to them all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfella Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 There's nee contact FFS, Hume was play acting, should be booked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Just now, STM said: If its deemed high foot, it should be a pen. Contact is irrelevant. Ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris L Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 I Do think if it was at the other end of the pitch it would have been given. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Just now, Chris L said: I Do think if it was at the other end of the pitch it would have been given. Rightly so against these cunts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 He kind of hindered the Mackem player with that high foot, it's not like it has to kick his head for there to be something. Probably still too soft though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 That's actually the perfect execution for how VAR should work. You can see why the linesman thinks in real time that Sesko's boot has made contact with Hume's face, but it hadn't so was over turned. And I don't think Hume didn't anything wrong either, the ball smacked him in the face at the same time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 People wanting Man United to win are doing my head in. I know its Sunderland but just plead the 5th. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 1 minute ago, STM said: People wanting Man United to win are doing my head in. I know its Sunderland but just plead the 5th. I've money on Man Utd so thats swung it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Novocastrian Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Might be in the minority but I’d rather the Mackems beat Man Utd….. I’ll get my coat….. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 6 minutes ago, STM said: People wanting Man United to win are doing my head in. I know its Sunderland but just plead the 5th. Nah. Sunderland could have a home game against a Tory all-star XI with Ian Watkins in goal and I'd probably still want the away win Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Just now, Elric said: Nah. Sunderland could have a home game against a Tory all-star XI with Ian Watkins in goal and I'd probably still want the away win What's H from Steps done wrong? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 I want whatever result keeps amorim stinking up manu the longest. if beating the mackems convinces the board to let him fuck up for another 2 months then great Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted October 4, 2025 Share Posted October 4, 2025 Just now, Fak said: What's H from Steps done wrong? Lost his job didn't he. Redundancies are a tragedy, always. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now