Scoot Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 8 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said: "Significant" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 7 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said: "All that I can say is we are living in the most exciting time for sports law." Good thing it's just as exciting as a 25 yard thunderbastard that hits the underside of the bar or Willock's pass to Isak in the 6-1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 24 minutes ago, Dokko said: Buy Minteh back for £50m charging the PL the difference. After all, we were forced to sell him due to their illegal restricting of trade. So many cases like this about to head their way. Goodbye PL. You are fucked. Proper fucked. Takes the piss that Brighton are being run using interest free loans but can afford to buy our prospects Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 It stated in the Samuel article that six clubs sided with them. 11 conspirators take Ipswich Southampton out the equation. So I reckon Arsenal Spurs Man utd Westham Palace Liverpool Brighton Wolves Bournemouth Fulham Brentford Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 In this arbitration process, Chelsea, Newcastle and Everton all acted as witnesses for City. Witnesses for the Premier League included Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Brighton and West Ham. Brentford, Bournemouth, Fulham and Wolves wrote letters in support of the rules. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 1 minute ago, Shearergol said: Takes the piss that Brighton are being run using interest free loans but can afford to buy our prospects Doesn’t really seem right, given they’d be able to sell him at a profit eventually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 We need to fire some big deals in now asap before the cunts put another rule in. Although its hard to see how they could ever block these deals now. The shareholder loans stuff must be encouraging news for restructuring PSR rules too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 It’s interesting how many clubs are happy to be in bed with the cartel clubs who have absolutely zero interest in their existence and wanted to burn the league to the ground with the European super league. Fucking idiots Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 8 minutes ago, Stifler said: Interesting to note that the Premier League have been deemed guilty of delaying an outcome on their sponsorships to be approved or rejected at 3 months, and 2 months, both of which are ‘unreasonable, unjust, and outside of their own riles, and guidelines.’ So basically the Premier League twice delayed making a decision on sponsorship deals. It's pretty likely they've been doing the same with us as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 3 minutes ago, Decky said: We need to fire some big deals in now asap before the cunts put another rule in. Although its hard to see how they could ever block these deals now. The shareholder loans stuff must be encouraging news for restructuring PSR rules too. can't see it being that easy,Jan window will be the same as the summer one. next summer is key Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 3 hours ago, TRC said: Just because your owners are rich, you shouldnt beable to put unlimited money into something that is a competitive sport imo. Success should be on sporting achievement not luck of having a rich owner. Just my opinion. Football has always been that way, just the numbers are way bigger now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Charlton Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 (edited) The gloves will have to come off after these findings surely.Proven in court to be a cartel fuck sake I wonder if we have had sponsorships blocked? Citeh seeking damages aswell Edited October 7 by Steve Charlton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Stifler said: Interesting to note that the Premier League have been deemed guilty of delaying an outcome on their sponsorships to be approved or rejected at 3 months, and 2 months, both of which are ‘unreasonable, unjust, and outside of their own riles, and guidelines.’ So basically the Premier League twice delayed making a decision on sponsorship deals. If one of which was deemed to be £80m for the year then that could mean a claim for what? £20m? For just one of said deals to Man City - is that correct? I wonder how much the PL actually has/rakes in once all the competition money is divvied back out to clubs etc. This is just one as well, there could be a multitude of similar claims and the screw also getting turned by the likes of Arsenal et al as they collectively shite their pants. The PL could be fucked. Edited October 7 by Heron Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 why are west ham sucking cartel cock, have they had enough of dildos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 (edited) 45 minutes ago, LFEE said: Great point in your first paragraph. However as for your second he’s done everything they’ve asked and thats why we are where we are now. In an illegal quagmire and a less attractive league to many due to strangled competition. Ultimately Masters is just a Patsy. He has absolutely no control. Just a figurehead to take the praise and blame and keep attention away from various owners with too much sway. People have forgot the noise at the time when it became apparent what The Cartel Clubs had done behind closed doors in getting Masters the Job. Edited October 7 by Hudson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 15 minutes ago, Stifler said: Interesting to note that the Premier League have been deemed guilty of delaying an outcome on their sponsorships to be approved or rejected at 3 months, and 2 months, both of which are ‘unreasonable, unjust, and outside of their own riles, and guidelines.’ So basically the Premier League twice delayed making a decision on sponsorship deals. Probably the reason we found ourselves scrambling to meet PSR in July. Have said that the club had sponsorships they expected to go through being delayed and delayed. That aside the club have played a blinder using Man City as the stalking horse in all that. Might not be as groundbreaking initially as some think/hope but definitely the start of better times for us and certainly not a good look for some of our competitors. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 16 minutes ago, astraguy said: In this arbitration process, Chelsea, Newcastle and Everton all acted as witnesses for City. Witnesses for the Premier League included Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Brighton and West Ham. Brentford, Bournemouth, Fulham and Wolves wrote letters in support of the rules. Fuck all of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 5 minutes ago, Heron said: If one iof which was deemed to be £80m for the year then that could mean a claim for what? £20m? For just one of said deals to Man City - is that correct? I wonder how much the PL actually has/rakes in once all the competition money is divvied back out to clubs etc. This is just one as well, there could be a multitude of similar claims and the screw also getting turned by the likes of Arsenal et al as they collectively shite their pants. The PL could be fucked. Tried to look on company house, but they have not posted accounts for 23 and are about 6 months late on normal accounts posting date of April. Are they skint ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 1 hour ago, Keegans Export said: I don't think that's true, the interest on the loan still counts. Lets say you take a £100m loan to build a new training ground and it costs you £15m/year in interest. The £100m doesn't get included because it's infrastructure but the £15m does. If you take the same loan and buy two players with it, both the amortisation & wages get included plus the £15m interest on the loan. Now that makes sense, thank you. The rule about interest in relation to infrastructure projects still seems a bit unfair. The clubs with the wealthier owners wouldn't need to provide the money in the form of a loan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 1 hour ago, Fak said: Are we about to lift off? I guess time will tell... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 5 minutes ago, Hudson said: Tried to look on company house, but they have not posted accounts for 23 and are about 6 months late on normal accounts posting date of April. Are they skint ? They just reported in a different manner than normal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 2 minutes ago, LFEE said: Points deductions galore about to drop! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 (edited) The whole thing is a mess really. By the letter of the rules Man CIty have been bending them and yet the only reason they or anybody else seeks to do that is because of rules brought in when the elites decided they didn't want anymore Chelsea's. Clubs spending more money than anybody else had never been a problem until then and neither apparently was dominance (Man United, Liverpool) Edited October 7 by Wolfcastle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now