r0cafella Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 5 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: We also shouldn’t assume what happens to Chelsea and PSG will be afforded to us. Err we should. Why? European law and the court of Arbitration. I have far more faith in getting a fair settlement from Uefa than I do the PL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 3 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Err we should. Why? European law and the court of Arbitration. I have far more faith in getting a fair settlement from Uefa than I do the PL. I’ve previously mentioned they banned AC Milan for less. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 1 minute ago, The College Dropout said: I’ve previously mentioned they banned AC Milan for less. Yeah and Im sure if Milan pursued it they could have obtained a different outcome. Uefa have to apply the rules in an even manner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 59 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: We also shouldn’t assume what happens to Chelsea and PSG will be afforded to us. Depends how much UEFA are in bed with the Saudis over coming years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shush Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 1 hour ago, Paully said: Ban then https://x.com/slbsn/status/1910209466055664043?s=46 Amazed Chelsea are not under far more scrutiny. They are openly and brazenly taking the piss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Considering what happened to Everton and Forrest I'm shocked more in the media can't see the blatant corruption that we are seeing right now. If there is any justice; Chelsea and Man City start next season with massive points deductions and transfer bans. Won't happen but it's what they deserve. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 14 minutes ago, Shush said: Amazed Chelsea are not under far more scrutiny. They are openly and brazenly taking the piss. That's unreal ! Everyone is too busy watching us and waiting for one wrong move, Chelsea acting like a former Soviet Union state selling mineral mines to its self. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 30 minutes ago, Mazzy said: Considering what happened to Everton and Forrest I'm shocked more in the media can't see the blatant corruption that we are seeing right now. If there is any justice; Chelsea and Man City start next season with massive points deductions and transfer bans. Won't happen but it's what they deserve. Yep. They’ve took the piss for years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 This is absolutely ridiculous. It's a game of cat and mouse at this stage. Just do the escrow thing and let clubs spend what and how they want. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 2 hours ago, r0cafella said: Yeah and Im sure if Milan pursued it they could have obtained a different outcome. Uefa have to apply the rules in an even manner. But they didn’t. So I’m not going to assume we’ll get the PSG treatment. You maybe right - but I want another smaller club to test it out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Pretty sure the info that’s come out today isn’t new, is it? I’ve known for months (from reading before in this thread) that Chelsea have set up this scheme whereby they retain the revenue of assets they’ve sold inter-company. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 6 minutes ago, Unbelievable said: Pretty sure the info that’s come out today isn’t new, is it? I’ve known for months (from reading before in this thread) that Chelsea have set up this scheme whereby they retain the revenue of assets they’ve sold inter-company. It was strongly rumoured but wasn't actually confirmed until their accounts were published. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keggy_Keagal Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 https://archive.ph/WfzOZ Every time I read this thread it seems like some club is able to circumnavigate the rules to suit . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 5 minutes ago, The Prophet said: It's absolutely turgid this whole thing. What are Bournemouth supposed to do? Just accept being a Sheff Utd? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Deducting points from Everton is only fair in this situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likelylad Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 (edited) I imagine a lot of these specific situations will be noted by many legal teams when the prem next get dragged in front of a tribunal. Edited April 10 by Likelylad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaztoon Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 You see Bournemouth tow the line for the cartel.. so a little help here and there is to be expected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 More and more evidence that the Premier care not about PSR, but limiting certain clubs. Everton, and Forest were just examples thrown into the fire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 35 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: It's absolutely turgid this whole thing. What are Bournemouth supposed to do? Just accept being a Sheff Utd? They vote in the rules just like the other PL clingers-on, then they breach them merrily. Fuck them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 (edited) Another American owned club getting away with not being sanctioned by the PL. Who'da thunk it??!! Edited April 10 by TK-421 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 My biggest issue with these rules is that the the fuckers who designed them, are so reluctant to apply them to every club (which agreed to them in the first place). It is so clear that certain clubs are more than taking the piss, yet they are getting away with it. ALL clubs should be punished if they break the rules, not just those who don't have the resources to come up with some elaborate schemes to avoid them. The more I think about it, I cannot fathom why everyone went along with it in the first place. Also, why aren't more clubs vocally calling the whole thing out as the shambles that it is? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 1 hour ago, JT24 said: Deducting points from Everton is only fair in this situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 1 hour ago, Gaztoon said: You see Bournemouth toe the line for the cartel.. so a little help here and there is to be expected. US-owned CuckClub, batting for the boys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonas Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 2 hours ago, The Prophet said: Oh lovely, one of the stories of the season and one that offered hope to smaller clubs reduced to cheating in this new climate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now