Jackie Broon Posted Thursday at 15:20 Share Posted Thursday at 15:20 3 hours ago, The Prophet said: It's not a story at all, our ownrrs did the same writing off the debt that they bought along with the club from Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted Thursday at 15:28 Share Posted Thursday at 15:28 2 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said: They vote in the rules just like the other PL clingers-on, then they breach them merrily. Fuck them I have nothing against Bournemouth, but they are voting for the rules to continue, so yes fuck them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
500bhp Posted Thursday at 16:29 Share Posted Thursday at 16:29 1 hour ago, Jackie Broon said: It's not a story at all, our ownrrs did the same writing off the debt that they bought along with the club from Ashley. In the Athletic article it says our new owners converted the MA loan nto equity. Bournemouth didn't do that they took the loan w/off credit into the P&L Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted Thursday at 17:04 Share Posted Thursday at 17:04 23 minutes ago, 500bhp said: In the Athletic article it says our new owners converted the MA loan nto equity. Bournemouth didn't do that they took the loan w/off credit into the P&L I should've tried to read the article before commenting, I assumed it was just about it being written off rather than actually recorded as profit, that seems dodgy as fuck if the PL have allowed it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackflap Posted Thursday at 20:12 Share Posted Thursday at 20:12 Cue Chelsea selling the club to themselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted Thursday at 20:59 Share Posted Thursday at 20:59 38 minutes ago, jackflap said: Cue Chelsea selling the club to themselves. Yeah, loan the club £1bn, sell it to themselves, wipe off the debt and put £1bn profit in the accounts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted Thursday at 21:55 Share Posted Thursday at 21:55 City verdict pushed back until the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted Thursday at 21:59 Share Posted Thursday at 21:59 4 minutes ago, The Prophet said: City verdict pushed back until the summer. Shocker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDog Posted Thursday at 22:47 Share Posted Thursday at 22:47 50 minutes ago, The Prophet said: City verdict pushed back until the summer. I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't trying to dot every i and cross every t fearing that City will shove it straight up their arse if the word it wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted Friday at 04:42 Share Posted Friday at 04:42 6 hours ago, The Prophet said: City verdict pushed back until the summer. EPL and UEFA are terrified of court cases, I think any club can just do what they want at this stage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted Friday at 05:21 Share Posted Friday at 05:21 7 hours ago, The Prophet said: City verdict pushed back until the summer. Enough of a proposed points deduction to relegate and need at least 9 months to run an appeals process so it gets heard and resolved in the same season it’s tabled? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted Friday at 09:02 Share Posted Friday at 09:02 11 hours ago, The Prophet said: City verdict pushed back until the summer. Which summer? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted Friday at 09:02 Share Posted Friday at 09:02 Just now, mouldy_uk said: Which summer? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted Saturday at 09:02 Share Posted Saturday at 09:02 PL are an absolute shambles which we already knew! https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6269885/2025/04/11/premier-league-chelsea-regulator/?source=user_shared_article Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjohnson Posted Saturday at 18:15 Share Posted Saturday at 18:15 On 10/04/2025 at 23:47, McDog said: I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't trying to dot every i and cross every t fearing that City will shove it straight up their arse if the word it wrong. I dont think they're even looking at the changes and just looking for reasons to delay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted yesterday at 19:28 Share Posted yesterday at 19:28 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago How did we spend so much on agent fees? Another one we can throw shade at Kelly for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbo_11 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Sibierski said: How did we spend so much on agent fees? Another one we can throw shade at Kelly for? If there were any contract renewals at this time there will likely be an agent fee which might suggest this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I dare say Kelly wasn't quite as 'free' as we thought he was, it's inevitable though these days Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Vlach’s agent commanding a seven figure sign-on fee no doubt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Sibierski said: How did we spend so much on agent fees? Another one we can throw shade at Kelly for? Going to start a movement demanding that players become responsible for the fees of their agents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, robbo_11 said: If there were any contract renewals at this time there will likely be an agent fee which might suggest this. Joelinton / Gordon / Miley main three. Would expect Lascelles/Dubs was automatic extension so shouldn’t command agent fees, then it’s the transfers we made in Vlac / Kelly / Osula and Hall (which I assume would’ve been paid agent wise when deal was made permanent). Still feels way higher than it ought to be. Been bent over by an agent or two in those deals somewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamPS Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Sibierski said: How did we spend so much on agent fees? Another one we can throw shade at Kelly for? Absolutely insane that £409m is leached out of the game like that. It’s equivalent to 460 per seat at SJP, so basically tickets could be half price if all that spend wasn’t required Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamPS Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) double post Edited 4 hours ago by WilliamPS Double post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 33 minutes ago, Sibierski said: How did we spend so much on agent fees? Another one we can throw shade at Kelly for? Agent fees are insane, it's why I started an agency in the first place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now