Jump to content

England's Tino Livramento


Yorkie

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Jesse Pinkman said:

Jacob Murphy looked very good at RB yesterday and has clearly been learning from Trippier. I would cancel this transfer and focus on LB and CB with our remaining funds. 

Livramento has looked very good for a whole season at Southampton at the age of 19, but its good to have options ready to step in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the recruitment team want to sign one of the most promising young full backs in the country rather than playing a winger out of position because he looked alright in a pre-season friendly, then serious questions need to be asked.

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.


Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.


Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.


Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

Did you used to work at Juventus?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.


Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

We could have but that’s a gamble for Southampton as it’s likely Chelsea would never do business with them again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jesse Pinkman said:

Jacob Murphy looked very good at RB yesterday and has clearly been learning from Trippier. I would cancel this transfer and focus on LB and CB with our remaining funds. 

Hope this is a comedy post. If not, give your fucking head a shake man :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.


Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

RTG would explode mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Shearergol said:

Hope this is a comedy post. If not, give your fucking head a shake man :lol:

I don’t know - using this logic I had a round of golf tonight and went round in about 120, terrible but on one par 3 I got the Green in one and birdied it so I’m gonna enter the open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...