Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

Better signing than maddison, which the maddison lovers will be disappointed with.


Proper aftertiming from me, this :lol: But kept thinking I wanted Barnes here, along with Maddison. With preference probably for Barnes.
 

Leicester supporting mate of mine seemed done with Maddison and said Barnes would be the better fit for us and value for money. 
 

I’m hoping this goes through and he’s proved right. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tina Tooner said:

What journalist first broke the Barnes link? 

Matt Law or whatever he’s called I think 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Danh1

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

He went big with the story recently, yep. But feels like we’ve been ‘linked’ for ages. 
 

Of course linking is just a bloke tweeting someone we might sign. 

Aye you’re right, been linked with him all summer tbf 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We were linked with Trippier and Botman for ages too. Hate it when people put others down for getting their hopes on us signing a player we are linked with by saying "the club doesn't operate like that, we dont sign linked players, it will be someone completely out of the blue". Whilst we do sign some players out of the blue Isak/Tonali, it isnt true about every signing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a good price for Barnes. Without ffp you'd say it was a no brainer.  Is there honey still for tea though.

8 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Which stat accounts for ASM binding up multiple defenders allowing more room for the rest of our team? 

Stats arent everything.

I agree (liked) the essence of that but there are equal non-existent stat fields that would be negative about ASM. Still better to read the game yourself than use stats as a basis, we underestimate our own ability to tell whether a player has played well or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tina Tooner said:

We were linked with Trippier and Botman for ages too. Hate it when people put others down for getting their hopes on us signing a player we are linked with by saying "the club doesn't operate like that, we dont sign linked players, it will be someone completely out of the blue". Whilst we do sign some players out of the blue Isak/Tonali, it isnt true about every signing. 


Tripper and the initial Botman interest were pre Ashworth. It’s clear our operation has tightened up considerably although still mainly working with a Nickson and co targets. 
 

Most of what’s we get to know when a transfer isn’t ‘out of the blue’ seems to depend on the other parties involved - selling club, selling club journos, rival bidders and agents. 
 

The Barnes stuff still feels agent driven but hopefully we will see in the next week if it’s real or not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Tina Tooner said:

We were linked with Trippier and Botman for ages too. Hate it when people put others down for getting their hopes on us signing a player we are linked with by saying "the club doesn't operate like that, we dont sign linked players, it will be someone completely out of the blue". Whilst we do sign some players out of the blue Isak/Tonali, it isnt true about every signing. 

 

Just depends on the circumstances and whether the selling club or agents want it played out in public or are friendly with certain journalists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

It’s only a benefit on the rare occasions he actually releases the ball early to those in space

 

Exactly. ASM is brilliant at pulling defenders towards himself and freeing up space for others, but then most of the time he tries to keep hold of the ball too long and ends up losing it rather than playing in those available players. This is what we mean when we refer to football intelligence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

Exactly. ASM is brilliant at pulling defenders towards himself and freeing up space for others, but then most of the time he tries to keep hold of the ball too long and ends up losing it rather than playing in those available players. This is what we mean when we refer to football intelligence.


Not only that but given his initial explosive pace, he should be playing on the shoulder more. The fact is the ball is always quicker than you, it’s  literally one of the first things every rapid kid should be taught. It’s great being able to beat a man when required, but the best in his position use space and movement to ensure they often don’t have to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Think if this was agent driven, you'd see more clubs mentioned in the running. The reporting so far seems pretty conclusive.


Hmmm it’s just the weird way the articles is written. Being talked about as a done deal without us even making a bid. Feels a bit like an attempt to to get more teams involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GeordieDazzler said:


Hmmm it’s just the weird way the articles is written. Being talked about as a done deal without us even making a bid. Feels a bit like an attempt to to get more teams involved.

 

The Gordon transfer was also played out very publically with Everton being as leaky as they are.

 

I think the key phrase is "formal bid". It sounds very much like the clubs have an informal agreement in place, probably an overall fee with stuff like payment terms and add-ons to be ironed out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Prophet said:

Joking aside, I do find it strange that eyebrows are being raised about Barnes, who's strength is being a direct goal threat who can shoot off both feet but people tug themselves senseless over Diaby, who's strength is being a direct goal threat who can shoot off both feet. Is it just that one plays on the left and the other on the right?

 

 

 

 

I think it's more about the position we're potentially signing, rather than the player himself, who's clearly very good. I dont think anyone would have expected us to sign another LW, given the majority of us think the priority positions for new signings atm are RW, LB and CB. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

Exactly. ASM is brilliant at pulling defenders towards himself and freeing up space for others, but then most of the time he tries to keep hold of the ball too long and ends up losing it rather than playing in those available players. This is what we mean when we refer to football intelligence.


This feels like a post from before last season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

 

I think it's more about the position we're potentially signing, rather than the player himself, who's clearly very good. I dont think anyone would have expected us to sign another LW, given the majority of us think the priority positions for new signings atm are RW, LB and CB. 

 

That was my thinking. Is the level of scepticism because Diaby plays on right wing and that is generally considered more a priority to upgrade than the left?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:


This feels like a post from before last season. 


Absolutely, I was frustrated last season that he was a bit too hesitant to run at fullbacks and instead played the easy and safe pass too often.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...