Jump to content

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, The College Dropout said:

Is Hall athletic?

 

i don't think he's particularly tall or fast. from the little I've seen of him, he looks a technician first and foremost.

 

 

Seems nippy, not lightning but quicker than the three buggers in the middle at the moment. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to cling onto hope the tweet above is correct (or something similar). Hall understands the situation, happy, developing on the ground and Howe sees where he's position will be long term. And this is just a short term 'pain' for long term gain. 

 

Otherwise, why have him involved at all in around first team squad? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

I'm going to cling onto hope the tweet above is correct (or something similar). Hall understands the situation, happy, developing on the ground and Howe sees where he's position will be long term. And this is just a short term 'pain' for long term gain. 

 

Otherwise, why have him involved at all in around first team squad? 

But then weirdly has played 5,9,12,6,7 minutes the last few times he’s played… which doesn’t add up if this is correct 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Menace said:

Can anyone tell me why he didn't get any game time today 

 

 

 

 

I don't think there's any mystery - nobody plays left back ahead of Dan Burn.

 

Targett doesn't, Livramento doesn't, Hall doesn't.

 

It's far less to do with Hall than it is with Burn, IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SUPERTOON said:

This may well be rubbish but thought I’d post it anyways 

 

 

 

:lol: Have they not just quoted some random proposing a change to valuing of home grown players for FFP purposes? Not what the actual rules are. 

 

Screenshot_20240302_172243_Brave.thumb.jpg.86a55d7b6d2444e6da747978dfda0987.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I’m not sure it’s clear at all tbh.

Keeping an eye out for whenever relegation is mathematically impossible, personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we could be trying to shaft Chelsea, if he doesn’t meet the signing criteria they would have to remove the £32m they put against their books, which in all likelihood would see them fail FFP, spurs pulled out of the Gallagher signing at the last minute possibly for the same reason, as they will get him for £40m instead of £60m in June knowing that Chelsea have to sell before June 31st 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...