Jump to content

Will Osula


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ketsbaia said:

Surprised we're not proceeding with 3 strikers, when we've just been presented with clear evidence about why we need some.

 

Who was the third? Are we classing Osula as a striker, despite him obviously lacking the skills required for that role?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ketsbaia said:

Surprised we're not proceeding with 3 strikers, when we've just been presented with clear evidence about why we need some.

 

I'd guess even if he stuck around Eddie would still have him 4th in the pecking order behind Gordon so it's not too surprising if a fee like this is on offer.

 

And while I don't feel like we specifically need a striker as a like-for-like replacement, getting an attack-minded player through the doors with this money could help unlock our attack even more to no end.

 

 

Edited by wormy

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Nucasol said:

The early summer release clause ones for Cunha and Pedro look great deals. A real marker for sensible clubs to adhere to. The frantic trolley dash here in the last week is absolutely fucking nuts.

 

You have to say, it's entertaining. :lol:

 

Felt like the last couple of deadline days have been boring but I'm maybe not remembering correctly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Froggy said:

 

You have to say, it's entertaining. :lol:

 

Felt like the last couple of deadline days have been boring but I'm maybe not remembering correctly. 

Aye they have, definitely. This one has been crackers, just wish we hadn't been at the centre of it tbh. I thought the Guehi saga last year was tough :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

What happened to not accepting a penny below £150m for Isak as well, pal? ;)

 

Just what we had to tell Liverpool to get them to fork out the £130 million and think it was a bargain for the spaghetti groined twat!

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

What happened to not accepting a penny below £150m for Isak as well, pal? ;)

 

 

The club never said we wanted £150m though. It was just a figure which was put out there to bump the fee up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Osula may have been raw as fuck and uncoordinated from time to time. 

 

But he did provide an option both in attack and out wide. 

 

He is tall, fast, has a trick and can cause problems. 

 

We now don't have that as an option even if it was just as a back up. 

 

Agree wholeheartedly that the fee is good for him. But I would like us to atleast try and pick up a cheap option for squad depth before the window shuts. 

 

One injury to our new guys puts us back to needing Gordon. Or if we decide to start both we won't have a bench option for late in games.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...