WilliamPS Posted September 19 Share Posted September 19 My guess is Chelsea have done something novel with wages. It’s widely reported their salaries are low, sub £100k. That hasn’t made much sense as why would a player being signed for 50m agree to that. I reckon they’ve done something with future transfer fees or something that boosts the cash the players get. For example if he’s sold before 2033, maybe Chelsea have to pay up his entire contract in full. Then for him adding a few years is guaranteeing more money like a higher salary, but he has to wait for it tl;dr Chelsea have found a new wheeze (or think they have) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 19 Share Posted September 19 5 hours ago, WilliamPS said: My guess is Chelsea have done something novel with wages. It’s widely reported their salaries are low, sub £100k. That hasn’t made much sense as why would a player being signed for 50m agree to that. I reckon they’ve done something with future transfer fees or something that boosts the cash the players get. For example if he’s sold before 2033, maybe Chelsea have to pay up his entire contract in full. Then for him adding a few years is guaranteeing more money like a higher salary, but he has to wait for it tl;dr Chelsea have found a new wheeze (or think they have) That's alright until they are sold but also means it'll be nigh on impossible to shift them without paying out a massive fee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted September 19 Share Posted September 19 (edited) Wages increase significantly after 5 years or something, when they've got nothing left PSR wise on the fee? Edited September 19 by Dr.Spaceman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 19 Share Posted September 19 Talk in the papers already about Chelsea flogging Mudryk. £62m basic rising to £87m with add ons, wonder if any of them have been activated. Can’t see them getting more than £30m back which would be a near £18m hit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 20 Share Posted September 20 8 hours ago, Nucasol said: Talk in the papers already about Chelsea flogging Mudryk. £62m basic rising to £87m with add ons, wonder if any of them have been activated. Can’t see them getting more than £30m back which would be a near £18m hit. When it comes to selling players it probably better to work out how much is left on the books as this is likely more impactful to them atm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted September 20 Share Posted September 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted September 20 Share Posted September 20 such a huge cunt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted September 20 Share Posted September 20 It can't be, remember when Arsenal fans ascended the moral high ground over this stuff last season? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 I see that when we do it, it's morally corrupt and rules should be changed to stop it from happening, but when Arsenal do it, it's completely fine and comparable to one of the best managers in Premier League history. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak Posted Saturday at 07:22 Share Posted Saturday at 07:22 Find that quote extremely funny for some reason Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted Saturday at 09:55 Share Posted Saturday at 09:55 Who did Chelsea end up leaving out of Thier 25 man squad? Haven't seen any fuse but then i have no idea on the players anymore it's that bonkers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted Monday at 15:44 Share Posted Monday at 15:44 Rodri done his ACL 😬 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted Monday at 22:26 Share Posted Monday at 22:26 (edited) Is he basically saying that he's just bad? Edited Monday at 22:27 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joelinton7 Posted Tuesday at 09:28 Share Posted Tuesday at 09:28 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewel Posted Tuesday at 09:46 Share Posted Tuesday at 09:46 Looks like Everton have survived yet again. The perennial turd that simply will not flush. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted Wednesday at 12:47 Share Posted Wednesday at 12:47 On 24/09/2024 at 11:28, Joelinton7 said: That's ironic when they complained so much about us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted Wednesday at 12:48 Share Posted Wednesday at 12:48 (edited) Brighton failed to beat Forest and Ipswich at home in their last 2, and their next 6 fixtures looks like this: Edited Wednesday at 12:49 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted Wednesday at 13:04 Share Posted Wednesday at 13:04 14 minutes ago, Erikse said: Brighton failed to beat Forest and Ipswich at home in their last 2, and their next 6 fixtures looks like this: Oooh I can see at least one of those helping them out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now