Jump to content

The Other 19


madras

Recommended Posts

My guess is Chelsea have done something novel with wages. It’s widely reported their salaries are low, sub £100k. That hasn’t made much sense as why would a player being signed for 50m agree to that.

 

I reckon they’ve done something with future transfer fees or something that boosts the cash the players get. For example if he’s sold before 2033, maybe Chelsea have to pay up his entire contract in full. Then for him adding a few years is guaranteeing more money like a higher salary, but he has to wait for it

 

tl;dr Chelsea have found a new wheeze (or think they have)

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WilliamPS said:

My guess is Chelsea have done something novel with wages. It’s widely reported their salaries are low, sub £100k. That hasn’t made much sense as why would a player being signed for 50m agree to that.

 

I reckon they’ve done something with future transfer fees or something that boosts the cash the players get. For example if he’s sold before 2033, maybe Chelsea have to pay up his entire contract in full. Then for him adding a few years is guaranteeing more money like a higher salary, but he has to wait for it

 

tl;dr Chelsea have found a new wheeze (or think they have)

That's alright until they are sold but also means it'll be nigh on impossible to shift them without paying out a massive fee. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talk in the papers already about Chelsea flogging Mudryk. £62m basic rising to £87m with add ons, wonder if any of them have been activated. Can’t see them getting more than £30m back which would be a near £18m hit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Nucasol said:

Talk in the papers already about Chelsea flogging Mudryk. £62m basic rising to £87m with add ons, wonder if any of them have been activated. Can’t see them getting more than £30m back which would be a near £18m hit.

When it comes to selling players it probably better to work out how much is left on the books as this is likely more impactful to them atm. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that when we do it, it's morally corrupt and rules should be changed to stop it from happening, but when Arsenal do it, it's completely fine and comparable to one of the best managers in Premier League history.

 

Andy Samberg GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Erikse said:

Brighton failed to beat Forest and Ipswich at home in their last 2, and their next 6 fixtures looks like this:

 

7b4bb41896c044b64b3a8fd11a9de6d1.png.6348598c25949dc7c159af342131f34c.png

 

 

 

Oooh I can see at least one of those helping them out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SiLvOR said:

Oh fuck right off. Course it was overturned. Like GB says, never happening if it's one of ours

 

Didn't Newcastle have two reds in the same match overturned? Or am I making that up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...