Jump to content

Brighton & Hove Albion 1-1 Newcastle United - 04/05/2025


Recommended Posts

Good god, reading some of these comments, really does demonstrate how psychologically damaged our fanbase is. 
 

Now for a second go back to the start of the season, or better yet after the 4-2 defeat to Brentford, now if someone told you then this team would win a cup and have CL qualification in their own hands with 3 games to play. You’d have been over the fucking moon.

 

Some posters on here need minge bungs, as minge wipes wouldn’t cut it 🤦🏻‍♂️

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

Because some people think a draw was a good and fair result?


Clearly not those posters no, the ones who seemingly want to diminish what these players have done. FFS there’s someone earlier in the thread trying to suggest that the Man Utd game was closer than the 4-1 score line suggested, despite us playing it in second gear.

 

im convinced some posters in here after having a threesome with Jennifer Anniston and Liv Tyler, would complain that Janine off Easternders wasn’t there too 🤦🏻‍♂️

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

 

No mention of the clear penalty they were denied when Tonali clattered into O'Reilly either [emoji38]

 

Or Barnes' dive to win the free kick that resulted in the handball for our late pen.

 

 

 

From what I remember that Tonali one was never a penalty like, if anything it was a foul the other way.

 

And their was contact on the Barnes FK. It was minimal, but it was there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tonali one was never a pen. O’Reilly chucks his leg across to initiate the contact. Even Lee Hendrie, who didn’t seem too complimentary about us all afternoon, agreed. 
 

The Barnes free kick was a clear foul. Barnes shifts the ball on too quickly for Van Hecke and then waits for the contact. He could have got out the way, yes. As he misses him with his right and then his trailing leg catches him on the way through. Van Hecke has slid in from side on/behind him and got nowhere near the ball. Why is it on Barnes to make sure there is no contact, even if minimal? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said:

Tonali one was never a pen. O’Reilly chucks his leg across to initiate the contact. Even Lee Hendrie, who didn’t seem too complimentary about us all afternoon, agreed. 

 

That who it was? Annoyed tf out of me with his instant dismissal of anything our way. Even more so when he was always correct, the c*nt 😂😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said:

Tonali one was never a pen. O’Reilly chucks his leg across to initiate the contact. Even Lee Hendrie, who didn’t seem too complimentary about us all afternoon, agreed. 
 

The Barnes free kick was a clear foul. Barnes shifts the ball on too quickly for Van Hecke and then waits for the contact. He could have got out the way, yes. As he misses him with his right and then his trailing leg catches him on the way through. Van Hecke has slid in from side on/behind him and got nowhere near the ball. Why is it on Barnes to make sure there is no contact, even if minimal? 

 

Aye, you're right actually. They've omitted the Barnes incident from the extended highlights and cba to reload MotD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the balance of play we were the better side. Not dealing with Minteh in that moment cost us 3 points. As good as it was from him, it was soft as fuck from Tino and Tonali... but these lads have credit in the bank.

 

Id have likely taken a draw but seeing how average they were, a draw is disappointing.

 

The sickener is actually Liverpools no show at Chelsea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, STM said:

On the balance of play we were the better side. Not dealing with Minteh in that moment cost us 3 points. As good as it was from him, it was soft as fuck from Tino and Tonali... but these lads have credit in the bank.

 

Id have likely taken a draw but seeing how average they were, a draw is disappointing.

 

The sickener is actually Liverpools no show at Chelsea.

 

 

Agree about Liverpool's no show, but at this stage of the season you really don't want to be relying on other teams doing you any favours. It's still in our hands and that's about as much as you can ask for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having watched it all the way through, I thought a point was about right.

 

First half was a bit of a non-event. We were better after the break, but didn't really feel we did enough to win the game, granted both teams will argue they had their chances.

 

It'll prove to be a decent point should we win those two home games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:


Clearly not those posters no, the ones who seemingly want to diminish what these players have done. FFS there’s someone earlier in the thread trying to suggest that the Man Utd game was closer than the 4-1 score line suggested, despite us playing it in second gear.

 

im convinced some posters in here after having a threesome with Jennifer Anniston and Liv Tyler, would complain that Janine off Easternders wasn’t there too 🤦🏻‍♂️


oh do fuck off

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TRon said:

 

 

Agree about Liverpool's no show, but at this stage of the season you really don't want to be relying on other teams doing you any favours. It's still in our hands and that's about as much as you can ask for.

Plus we are capable of beating all 3 teams. 2 homers and we've already beaten Arse away. Nothing to fear, all to play for. In Eddie we trust!

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

There definitely is an issue re ball retention given the players available.  I’m confident that it’s an issue that Howe will address in the summer - I think some of it is coming from an evolution in our style of play

It’s almost intentional.  We rarely keep the ball for keeping the balls sake.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's been mentioned but that's got to be the quietest we've ever kept Welbeck. Didn't even have a shot of any kind, barely noticed he was playing til he was booked for dissent late on. A welcome change from his usual goal against us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Prophet said:

Having watched it all the way through, I thought a point was about right.

 

First half was a bit of a non-event. We were better after the break, but didn't really feel we did enough to win the game, granted both teams will argue they had their chances.

 

It'll prove to be a decent point should we win those two home games.

 

Think if we'd got the Gordon penalty we'd have won the game, felt we would have had real momentum

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

It’s almost intentional.  We rarely keep the ball for keeping the balls sake.  

Aye, if we want to challenge for the league it's an area we simply have to improve on. Not sure Howe's got that in his locker mind. We'll see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...