Nicolas Jackson

[Famous Nick]

cant wait for window to close to see what these transfer gurus will report from 2nd of September. they probably off to holidays from the money they get from clubs and agents...

 

[Deuce]

3 hours ago, lovejoy said:

This is a decent read;

 

 

https://archive.ph/cZYJk

 There’s a very exciting player there that a manager known for developing and getting the best out of young players would relish working with.

[toontownman]

They signed him for 32m any more than 40-45m is ridiculous.

 

Ideally a loan to buy. He has certainly done nothing to warrant a price tag double what they paid, let alone nearly triple.

 

At a reasonable price he could be a good signing. Not confident Chelsea are letting him go on the cheap. They were reasonably kind to us with Hall though.

[Mike]

1 hour ago, Beren said:

 

Remember the halcyon days of DCL.

 

I'm two weeks from sending Obafemi Martins a DM on behalf of the club.

[Disco]

Be mad if we signed him and after a 5 in 7 spell the Gallowgate burst out a 

 

I’m sorry Nick Jackson

Your goals are for real

Never meant to doubt your shooting guy 

I apologise a million times 

[Mike]

3 minutes ago, Deuce said:

 There’s a very exciting player there that a manager known for developing and getting the best out of young players would relish working with.

 

I'm terrified to spend 80 million on a project though. Let's just load up on Brazilians, man. Genuinely just sign ten brazilians and let them live with Bruno or sommat. @Flip lend a hand ffs.

[r0cafella]

Time to nail my opinion to the mast. 

 

Jackson for reasonable money as a rotation option is fine although this semes unrealistic. 

 

Jackson for big money as an isak replacement is terrible. 

 

Let's see how it plays out. 

 

 

Edited August 7, 2025 by r0cafella

[Vinny Green Balls]

wow, shit just escalated here. It's all having a laugh now.

[Chris_R]

Hate the idea of supporting Chelsea's abhorrent business model. Fuck them and everything they're doing. 

 

Let them fucking rot with their squad of 50 players in big contracts, don't validate and enable them. Genuinely sickening that we're considering this. 

 

Nobody should touch a Chelsea reject unless it's to buy them at a loss.

[toontownman]

30 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

Hate the idea of supporting Chelsea's abhorrent business model. Fuck them and everything they're doing. 

 

Let them fucking rot with their squad of 50 players in big contracts, don't validate and enable them. Genuinely sickening that we're considering this. 

 

Nobody should touch a Chelsea reject unless it's to buy them at a loss.

Unfortunately I presume we have to play the game (of thrones) to a certain extent. We need to be very VERY calculated if we are to find ways to catch up. Having workable relationships with the big 6 and other PL clubs is paramount really. As much as I'd love to go all in fuck everyone. That's what we will feel like behind closed doors lol

[Menace]

Imagine telling people after we qualified for CL and won a trophy a few months back that Nicolas Jackson will be Isaks replacement 

 

 

Edited August 7, 2025 by Menace

[David Edgar]

Have Jackson shoot me if he signs. I'll no doubt survive the attempt but at least the sheer hatred for how our club is being run will be expressed.

[Sima]

Fuck signing this absolute joker.  We’ll just cement our place as total cucks if we’re buying this kind of shite cast off.

 

When do Tonali, Livramento, Bruno and Gordon leave as they won’t put up with this shite for long.

[Menace]

He's also on a one match ban after he got sent off against us

[TheBrownBottle]

2 hours ago, toontownman said:

They signed him for 32m any more than 40-45m is ridiculous.

 

Ideally a loan to buy. He has certainly done nothing to warrant a price tag double what they paid, let alone nearly triple.

 

At a reasonable price he could be a good signing. Not confident Chelsea are letting him go on the cheap. They were reasonably kind to us with Hall though.

Not sure £35m for a teenage full back is being kind, mind

[Jewel]

What's the point of paying 80m for Jackson and then saying "oh, Eddie will make him a quality player yet".

 

For 80m he should already be an established quality player.

 

I feel we ask too much of Eddie sometimes. The man is not Jesus Christ. He will not be able to turn water into wine every single time.

[Menace]

For context I think for £40-£50M he'd be a good signing, however they doubled their money on Maudeke who wasn't exactly a raving success and the market for wingers isn't as saturated as strikers. They will easily fetch £70M + for Jackson which honestly is bonkers.

[r0cafella]

2 minutes ago, Menace said:

For context I think for £40-£50M he'd be a good signing, however they doubled their money on Maudeke who wasn't exactly a raving success and the market for wingers isn't as saturated as strikers. They will easily fetch £70M + for Jackson which honestly is bonkers.

Only if us or Saudi buy him they will. No chance anyone with a brain pays that much for him. 

[Menace]

[Zero]

I still don’t understand why don’t just go and find the next Jackson.

 

Its not even the next Isak, just a Jackson, whom Chelsea paid 30m and deemed not good enough, and now ask us for 70m?

 

ridiculous

 

 

Edited August 7, 2025 by Zero

[nemtizz]

In insolation this would be a good signing for anything below £45m but the fact he’ll

be replacing Isak means I’ll be watching a different sport next season.  

[Ritchie]

I don’t mind Jackson.

 

I do mind £80 million though, wtf?!

[Menace]

2 minutes ago, nemtizz said:

In insolation this would be a good signing for anything below £45m but the fact he’ll

be replacing Isak means I’ll be watching a different sport next season.  

 

[Mattoon]

Jackson is a pressing monster and perfect foil for Howe's brand of football, having said that he can't hit a barn door and what's the point in a striker that doesn't know where the net is? There's still better options out there for a similar price, Chelsea will have us over a barrel, it feels like a large chunk of PSR to go backwards.

[wyn davies]

He's crap , and trouble. Else Chelsea wouldn't want rid.