Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just bung the council a few brown envelopes to remove the restriction on rebuilding the east stand, increase the gallowgate as well to have a symmetrical ground with circa 60k capacity. Probably the cheapest option and could be completed in a year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ponsaelius said:

 

If you think having a city centre stadium causes congestion on matchdays it would be far, far worse having it outside the centre. 

not

In the current location huge amounts of people get into the city on matchday via public transport. The centre of the city is served from everywhere. Metro from the coast, buses from the West End, trains from the Tyne valley - even walking in from likes of Jesmond. It's a natural orbital location from transport routes to end and makes it a very good, efficient and sustainable location. And because it's a city centre location people drift in during the day, some coming in early to eat or drink or shop, others turning up close to kick off. This controls the flow and arrival of people naturally. 

 

I can't think of anywhere outside the city that is as remotely well placed for transport. If you move it out of a central orbit you have to provide direct transport routes. That causes an enormous bottle neck and would be horrendous for the road network because there would not be public transport infrastructure. And because it would be out of the centre everybody would go to the ground at exactly the same time after spending the day in town. 

 

The current location is not just great for the setting (which is the best of any ground I've ever been to) and history - it's a very good location in general. It's an agglomerater which boosts the coffers of the city businesses - and this is reciprocated by boosting attendances. The location is one of the main reasons our crowds have been so good for so long. 

 

The only thing that should even be considered is the 90s plan to move it onto Castle Leazes behind Leazes Park. Otherwise it should stay exactly where it is. 

 

 

 

 

All very valid points. I agree, moving out of the city centre is probably not a great idea when you take all that into consideration. On match day you usually get fans streaming into the stadium from all parts of the city, would not want to lose that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Kanji said:

One of my favorite topics - stadium expansion, renovation or new build. The infrastructure stuff is the topic I love to chat about. 
 

I think revisiting the Castle Leazes plan is probably the way to go. Just want the current stadium either retained or repurposed to either be the academy/training or something similar. 

 

You might enjoy these posts that I made a few years back then, over on the "Newcastle Forum of Skyscraper City" . . . 

 

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/newcastle-as-it-might-have-been.1009531/post-54625251

 

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/newcastle-as-it-might-have-been.1009531/post-53665235

 

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/newcastle-as-it-might-have-been.1009531/post-53090947

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I mentioned a few pages back. Do not forget. We are owned by a very rich owners who I'm sure have been involved in construction of bigger buildings than SJP. 

 

All they need to do is splash some cash to hire the best engineers, architects, construction companies, lawyers and etc that money can buy and I'm sure they'll be able to keep SJP in its same location. It'd be an engineering marvel, deserving to be documented on the Nat Geo channel. 

 

I'm pretty sure the owners do not want the stadium outside of the city and know its importance of staying where it is now.

 

 

Edited by nufcjb

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, nufcjb said:

Like I mentioned a few pages back. Do not forget. We are owned by a very rich owners who I'm sure have been involved in construction of bigger buildings than SJP. 

 

All they need to do is splash some cash to hire the best engineers, architects, construction companies, lawyers and etc that money can buy and I'm sure they'll be able to keep SJP in its same location. It'd be an engineering marvel, deserving to be documented on the Nat Geo channel. 

 

I'm pretty sure the owners do not want the stadium outside of the city and know its importance of staying where it is now.

 

 

 

 

The Saudi's are building the entire Neom city from scratch and spending $500bn on it

The Reuben's are highly successful property developers

 

Expanding / relocating a football stadium would be a piece of piss for the new owners

 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:

 

The Saudi's are building the entire Neom city from scratch and spending $500bn on it

The Reuben's are highly successful property developers

 

Expanding / relocating a football stadium would be a piece of piss for the new owners

 

 

 

 

Exactly. Here we are, on a football forum, giving ideas on how we can increase SJP's capacity in its current location or even moving when we have owners who literally pay people to think the best for them and make it happen.

 

Fucking goosebumps man. Ever since I was a kid, I loved to dream and imagine how great SJP can look and be. Ashley took that enthusiasm away from me to the point that I once celebrated that we installed new dugouts during the Pardew years ffs. There was nothing to get excited about SJP during Ashley's reign.

 

And now, not only do we have cash rich owners, we have owners who are into buildings and construction and real estate. Imagine if we had skint owners who just tookover from Ashley with no ambition for SJP. It would have crushed dreams.

 

 

Edited by nufcjb

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why people want to rebuild st james, i'd find it very sad to see it completely go. Maybe stands can be rebuilt but i find the ultra modern stadiums all look a bit bland and samey. Newcastle would look wrong without st james at the top. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, huss9 said:

leazes terrace - an issue even money cant overcome.

You'd be surprised how science and engineering can work these days. Forget brown envelopes. Thoe are things of the past.

 

 

Edited by nufcjb

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually reading up and watching videos of what they want that new city Neom to be like. Building a city from scratch in the desert ffs. I heard about it back in 2020 but someone brought it up earlier and even the other day, that Manc Prof.Chadwick also mentioned it on SSN, this Neom city is actually a breathtaking project.

 

A rebuilding/expanding a stadium in a limited space/area project would be like building a spanking new bathroom for one of MBS' milkman for them. It'd be piss easy work for their engineers/architects/contractors with all the money, science and technology available to them. Really can't wait to know their plans

 

 

 

Edited by nufcjb

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue with Leazes Terrace is not just engineering. You could certainly gain height vertically without having to touch the terrace itself with modern engineering. But the Grade I listing also gives huge weight to the historic setting of the listed terrace - which any increased scale would adversely effect. Not to mention the direct and immediate overshadowing and loss of light to the residents. I'm not sure building a bigger stand there would ever really be possible. 

 

The Gallowgate is more possible although the metro station underneath makes it an expensive endeavour. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tiresias said:

I don't know why people want to rebuild st james, i'd find it very sad to see it completely go. Maybe stands can be rebuilt but i find the ultra modern stadiums all look a bit bland and samey. Newcastle would look wrong without st james at the top. 

 

Aye. I love the way you get occasional unexpected views of it from all over town (particularly the one from the A193 between the two Shields Road roundabouts)

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OpenC said:

 

Aye. I love the way you get occasional unexpected views of it from all over town (particularly the one from the A193 between the two Shields Road roundabouts)

It's when you're on the train with away fans and you come round the corner on the Gateshead end of the King Edward Bridge and you hear them "Look at that!".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never had that experience but aye, I can imagine it. Didn't even realise you can see it from a northbound train, I'm always looking down the river at the bridges with that swelling heart you get when you're back :)

 

 

Edited by OpenC

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OpenC said:

Never had that experience but aye, I can imagine it. Didn't even realise you can see it from a northbound train, I'm always looking down the river at the bridges with that swelling heart you get when you're back :)

 

 

 

You have to be on the other side (left in direction of travel)  and it's probs about 10secs, come under a road bridge/tunnel and just before it straightens on to the bridge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, loki679 said:

No residents if we buy all the houses. 

 

Not to go down a boring planning rabbit hole to a jokey suggestion but even if nobody was living in them, be it through lack of demand or artificially engineered by an owner (as suggested), they would still remain residential in use and would be assessed as such with the same weight. 

 

To remove any direct residential amenity consideration you would have to fundamentally change the use of the Terrace entirely. And changing the use of a Grade I listed building from the use it was originally intended and designed for for is an extremely difficult thing to do, even when a building is falling apart and unviable, never mind when it's well used and in good condition. It would a bit like like trying to turn St Paul's Cathedral into a giant softplay when it gets 2 million visitors a year. 

 

I don't think people quite realise what a huge constraint LT is to development of that side. And indeed should be, tbh. Newcastle is about more than a football stadium as much as we all love it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, madras said:

It's when you're on the train with away fans and you come round the corner on the Gateshead end of the King Edward Bridge and you hear them "Look at that!".

Aye love being on the train when you cross the Tyne and people are gawping out the windows unexpectedly in awe and telling others to look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...