Jump to content

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Kilcline said:

It varies significantly - saw the below kicking about last month. There's also been quite a significant move towards maximising non-matchday use aswell with new stadia and facilities, I read something recently about how Fulham's new roof terrace thing was almost built with non-football use in mind first to bring the money in year-round, and they also then have the space to sell tickets to the football for. All linked to a change in corporate/hospitality buying habits and trends supposedly, so clubs are less building "facilities for corporate guests at the football" but "event spaces that we can also sell to corporate guests who want to go to the football." All very wanky but where the coin is

623555786_1324604309708155_4290789056153161723_n.thumb.jpg.8666765c38016c1824cca9f93f74b38c.jpg

Very surprised not to see West Ham on that list, maybe those empty seats do have an impact after all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, deejeck said:

Very surprised not to see West Ham on that list, maybe those empty seats do have an impact after all.

They're not just outside it either, think they're down at about £40m - £45m per season.

 

Mind I'd not spend anything there either if my only option was Brewdog for a pint, I'd rather the shite options at our place! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They only had 1 home cup game too, and that was 2nd round of Carabao, which will impact it. We had 6, so a quarter more home games than them. Obviously CL this year will give us a significant bump, as it will have done Villa in the above table.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/02/2026 at 09:48, Fenham Mag said:

 

Easy to say when you have lost to Bournemouth at home. 

 

Exactly. If they were flying high they'd be loving it. They're venting because they are on a bad run of form and have a shit home record. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/02/2026 at 10:07, Danh1 said:

What club has hugely benefited from a new stadium? 
 

West Ham haven’t, Spurs haven’t, Arsenal only just looking as good as they were pre Emirates, Everton still early days. 
 

Man City isn’t really a valid example imo.

 

Leaves Brentford and Brighton but they are mid table clubs at best now. 

I can name you 2 clubs who would very likely not be anywhere near where they are now if they hadn’t moved to a new stadium, and I don’t even have to leave the North East.

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Stifler said:

I can name you 2 clubs who would very likely not be anywhere near where they are now if they hadn’t moved to a new stadium, and I don’t even have to leave the North East.

Neither of the ones I'm thinking of have really changed since moving. One has just had (broken up by one season in the PL) and are currently having their second and third longest spells outside the top division (previously 1954-1974) and the other has just has their longest spell outside the top divsion and longest spell in the third tier.  

If they make more money its relative to everybody else also making more money so they're basically where they are (as we know until recently one of them has the same match day revenue as West Brom and Norwich for example)

 

 

Edited by Wolfcastle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Wolfcastle said:

Neither of the ones I'm thinking of have changed in status since moving. One has just had (broken up by one season in the PL) and are currently having their second and third longest spells outside the top division (previously 1954-1974) and the other has just has their longest spell outside the top division and longest spell in the third tier.

If they stayed at their old grounds then they would have slipped through the leagues.

Neither of those stadiums would have been fit for purpose, neither of them would allow for either club to gain commercial income, and they wouldn’t allow for larger capacities.

Financially both of those clubs would have been fucked as soon as they were relegated in the 90’s.

They’d both be League Two clubs at best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Stifler said:

If they stayed at their old grounds then they would have slipped through the leagues.

Neither of those stadiums would have been fit for purpose, neither of them would allow for either club to gain commercial income, and they wouldn’t allow for larger capacities.

Financially both of those clubs would have been fucked as soon as they were relegated in the 90’s.

They’d both be League Two clubs at best.

Yep - and I don’t remember any collective whining or grumbling from Mackems or Smoggies re leaving Joker or Ayresome.  And Roker was comfortably as historic as SJP, and arguably more linked to Sunderland’s identity (they were the Rokerites until they needed a new nickname due to the move, and asked Soccer AM to vote on what it should be …)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, madras said:

You can only realistically compare Roker and Ayresome to a St James'pre 93.

There weren’t many grumbles on Tyneside either re the prospect of a move away from SJP.  The sentimental element seems to be a very, very recent thing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, madras said:

You can only realistically compare Roker and Ayresome to a St James'pre 93.

The question was name a club that have benefitted from a move to a new stadium.

Like I said, you can name 2 clubs in the North East.

You can also add on Arsenal, Man City etc without even going down the leagues, and all pre AT&T stadiums which changed what a stadium should be and have.

 

 

Edited by Stifler

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stifler said:

The question was name a club that have benefitted from a move to a new stadium.

Like I said, you can name 2 clubs in the North East.

You can also add on Arsenal, Man City etc without even going down the leagues, and all pre AT&T stadiums which changed what a stadium should be and have.

 

 

 

Its comparing apples with dustbin lorries though. For your examples you can use Liverpool at the opposite end.

 

Fwiw I'm not against moving but it would have to be the perfect move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wallsendmag said:

I'd put a good case forward for Brighton and Brentford as well.


Leicester won the league in their new stadium, although have to balance that with the mess they find themselves in now

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, vicente_14 said:


Leicester won the league in their new stadium, although have to balance that with the mess they find themselves in now

 

They seemed to go tits up after their owner died in the helicopter crash though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Wallsendmag said:

 

They seemed to go tits up after their owner died in the helicopter crash though.

Damned shame for The Foxes as he was a great owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...