All Activity

I haven't got an account mate, I used to and deleted it. Makes no odds like, You can read anything semi-interesting anyway

His argument in favour of it seems to be the richest clubs in the world are getting paid a lot to turn up.

https://newcastle-online.org/topic/37260-sunderland/page/60/#comment-7140898 You had us nailed on going back to League one if we were promoted As I say Brute, Keep coming out with your usual drivel, the opposite usually happens when you do.

What about the young Spanish striker at Porto, would cost big money and could play Isak in the 10 role if Howe really is considering a change in formation. Sounds crazy to think about playing Isak elsewhere, but sometimes we do struggle to get him involved and i think he’s much better when not receiving ball with his back to goal.

I'm OK with the name change if it means loads of extra money. When Ashley did it it was just free advertising for his tat. Everyone will always call it St James' Park anyway, until we move to a new ground

It was worth it for him as he left on a "vinegar tits" high. I'm wondering what your user name is over there ? Please tell me you're Keith

Both Chelsea and Man City are fantastic sellers the best in the league, we I'd imagine are the worst.

Related parties to our owners. Again these comments are on the basis of the big talk and the follow through.

Following the party line. His Cartel paymasters wouldn’t have it any other way.

Not seen much of him myself, but that Guessand sounds handy.

Ah OK, see what you're saying. I'm not sure I believe there are companies queuing up to sponsor our training ground or training kit mind. That's very low profile stuff. And I don't want a stadium sponsor if it means changing the name.

What a melt.

No training ground sponsor, no training kit sponsor, no stadium sponsor etc. It just points to our owners not being invested to the point of us being number 1, because if this was truly the aim we can't afford to leave anything on the table.

Wait until you find out how many posts Sima made on the SMB, I think it was in the thousands.

There's no point even judging it at this stage as the team at present is going to be nothing like the one that starts the season in 6 weeks time. We need to recruit incredibly well to even have a sniff, The window so far however is showing promising signs.

Have we? How do you mean, by turning down people who wanted to sponsor us?

A keeper, a CB and a RW to actually challenge and by challenge I mean be within 10 points. But depth is just as important as those 3, and without it you wont come close especially with the CL schedule now. Isak being somewhat regularly unavailable is a big hit to those aspirations as well. We are at least 3/4 seasons away from a squad with the ability to do that.

Because of price, and our tight budget. Honestly the stats you put out here doesn't actually scream of a great signing at £40m? Not sure what you mean. The other signings were obviously better, but Barnes is okay. Not saying it was a bad signing by any means, everything doesn't have to be either great or bad.

Ah sorry, didn't quite read your post clearly!

Double post.

You are a sunderland fan who has made over 300 posts on a Newcastle United forum. I wonder what your mates on rtg think of you ? I'm slightly worried for you.

Citation needed. We have left a lot of sponsorship money on the table regardless of APT.

Do you know anything about this Romulo that Fulham are looking at? These smaller clubs have to be creative when it comes to signings, if they have good scouts we are in a position to blow them out of the water same way Chelsea are doing with our first choice targets.

Yep, that's what I was hinting at in my post, right? Without APT, we'd have better sponsorships, which means more money, and we'd be further along than we are now.