healthyaddiction

Then we still get to go onto Twitter and message every Liverpool fan we can find "Know your place!" and "There's a food chain".

I don't see a world where we sell Isak, with three years left on his contract, for well below our valuation, regardless of whether he wants to go or not.

It'll feel even better when be comes off the bench for Isak vs Leeds United.

Not believing the bloke who thinks Liverpool are going to bid 100m euros for Isak.

It is, but, it might be a case that we're offering a total package of 100m, but less up front, so not technically meeting the release clause. If the bid is real, which it probable isn't.

There is a certain man from Blyth who did quite well.

We need to sell Gordon and buy a left footed left winger so we can go full throwback 4-4-2.

Seen a Liverpool fan on Twitter claim that Onstein changed his tweet to say Ekitike was being bought to play with Isak under instruction from Newcastle as we don't want it to get out that we've agreed to sell Isak to Liverpool. Liverpool are breathing the copium deep right now.

Gordon broken a leg recently or something?

He joined Atletico last summer for 90m. I seriously doubt he's available under any circumstances.

Vindaloo Vindaloo Vindaloo Vindaloo nah nah Vindaloo Vindaloo Vindaloo Vindaloo nah nah Vindaloo Vindaloo And we all like Vindaloo He's Elanga And we're gonna score one more than you Elanga!

The first post was three years ago to be fair.

Fofana is a left winger. You specifically stated you didn't think he's worth more than 25m. How many Premier League proven players have gone for less than that (without some other type of circumstance like a contract ending)? Lloyd Kelly cost 20m for gods sake.

Have you posted this from the 2010s?

Really it's only a matter of time before we have the first premier League match decided in a hell in a cell.

Every player should have their own entrance theme tune. Next, we can have Joelinton attacking Salah with a steel chair before the bell even rings.

Why is it that clubs like Chelsea can buy a player, they fail to hold down a place in the team and play quite poorly, and then are able to sell them for a massive profit? It feels like a scam.

Clearly Prime Minister, former head of the CPS, and known Arsenal fan, Keir Starmer forces the CPS to hold back on charging him until Partey's contract expired.

Yeah, but it appears to definitely be a risk. Maybe one taking of course if the price is right. They seem to be very keen over the idea of selling him before his value drops too far.

Benfica fans don't seem to love him based on this: It appears he is very error prone.

As I say, I trust Howe's judgement and accept I must be wrong, but goal contributions won't convince me. I absolutely despise how prevent its used as a stat.

I don't really get it with Elanga, but Howe appears to love him and the Forest fans rate him massively, so I'm going to assume I'm completely wrong.

That's what the headline said. It's not actually what the article said.