Yorkie

Yeah right.

Why couldn't the poll options have been 'yes' and 'no'? No. I don't now and i didn't then. Poor manager.

Aye, the Roeder thing that i said was a bit of an over-reaction, they possibly would still have beaten us, but Roeder's tactics were still shite.

Woul dbe absolutely ecsatic if we beat them. Another 6/7-1 would be canny.

Hilarious: I'm 'Toon'. QUOTE(Toon @ Dec 20 2006, 21:52) Not arguing with the fact that Robben was fouled - he was, no doubt. (Looked like a right tit, though - he cheated by flying into the box in an attempt to get a penalty). Cheated by flying into the box? He was at full pace, took a knock and rode it, then was scythed down at pace, this tends to mean that you fall with the momentum of said pace in the direction you are travelling. QUOTE(Toon @ Dec 20 2006, 21:52) It was the fact that you moved the ball about three yards to get a better shot at goal. That was the cheating. The foul was about a foot outside the box and the ball was on the line, one foot doesn't equate three yards. QUOTE(Toon @ Dec 20 2006, 21:52) Plus, your players were flying all over the place all the way through the match. Generally because your players were kicking us all over the place all the way through the match. Any team with Parker and Butt in the mid-field isn't going to be known for their subtle ball skills. QUOTE(Toon @ Dec 20 2006, 21:52) I'm not saying we were brilliant - we would have beaten you if it wasn't for Roeder. He shoul dhave taken Parker off and brought Sibi on far sooner - when we were on top and dominating. Good, because you weren't. I don't think Newcastle were ever really dominating, they had good spells but not much that overly bothered us, and I certainly don't think you'd have beaten us with the team you put out today. --- 'Scythed down by Butt'. :lol: Chelsea C***s. Swiftly left their forum, can't be arsed with that.

I disagree with your reasoning, but it's not that i'm bothered about so that's why i've omitted that from the quote. Plus, i've sat and argued about Roeder's tactics last night too much now and can't be bothered to do it again. We should have made subs, simple as. What was really disappointing about your post and your little jab, is that you've chosen to pinpoint me, out of the multitudes of people who share a similar opinion to mine.

Apparently, your talking crap and don't even have a link. Would have been easier to just believe me. Tha majority of people read SkySports. You can F*** off n'all... you telling me that i talk crap. :roll: http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=436843&CPID=8&clid=4&lid=&title=Stelios+rues+his+luck

We're after Stelios apparantely, rumoured £2m bid. Why the hell do we want him? Isn't he a right-winger? :roll:

His set-piece against us in the San Siro was f***ing quality. Nowhere near as good as Nobby's volley.

Emre's shite at free-kicks and corners. I don't know why he keeps taking them. Nobby is clearly the better set-piece specialist.

Have a good time mate, see you in Feb.

||| Read between the lines.

What? Good signings? Luque? The only good signing Souness made was Emre. The Krul.

:lol: Rock hard you ain't ya.

Sibierski should have been brought on sooner, You changed your mind about the subs then, Gemmill? ;-) No. bluebigrazz.gif You were going on as if all we needed to do was fling on some subs when in reality we had very little on the bench. Sibierski and that was about it really. Did you read my uber-post that replied to your initial comment about the subs? Cos i'm not going through it again.

Sibierski should have been brought on sooner, You changed your mind about the subs then, Gemmill? ;-)

It has to cross the line to be a goal. There was a hint of irony in my post. ;-)

Precisely. Martins is barely an out and out striker. He likes to come back and mix the play up, it's what he's good at. A lot of the time in the first half (when we actually had an impetus), we were playing 4-6-0. Not a critisism to Martins, it just ain't his game.

Meh. Given Solano --- Taylor --- Ramage --- Huntington Milner --- Emre --- Butt --- Duff Martins --- Dyer Dyer didn't work down the right. I wanted him there initially but i suppose that's not really suited to him and i don't think it ever really was. He needs to be played through the middle where he can mix things up and make a nuisance of himself. I'd have Duff there, but it only depends on whether or not he's fit. If he isn't, i'd have Rossi there in a like-for-like switch. Seppe played well there agsint Chelsea. I reckon Sibi will be an excellent impact player.

And you know this how? Pathetic attitude is that tbh. There was absolutely nowt happening for us as it was - we may aswell make the substitutions, even if we're not guaranteed a great reaction. May as well keep the better players on, more chance Better players they may be. But they were doing fuck all tonight.

And you know this how? Pathetic attitude is that tbh. There was absolutely nowt happening for us as it was - we may aswell make the substitutions, even if we're not guaranteed a great reaction.

Thats' correct imo. But robben doesn't need to act like he's got a rocketlauncher up his ass.. And i hate that diving from him, and that acting like if he was shot with a shotgun So he was 'hacked' down was he?

Tell you on Saturday morning.

Oh SHIT. Just remembered - i've gotta do the report for this bastard.

Twat on the Chelsea forum: "Robben was fouled twice en route to the free-kick - he stealthily avoided the Solano challenge but was hacked down by Butt."