robbo_11

It feels like there is a red card and another penalty in this game.

I understand it as this would have created an opportunity for a club or clubs to influence the Premier League into a decision. The club most likely would need to produce evidence from during the test stage to indicate they had provided everything as requested and other shareholders had acted in a way that had impeded their ability to compete or the club suffered damages throughout this process. I feel like the arbitrition actually covers the main issue which was highlighted as separation between KSA and PIF in terms of the OADT.

Jesus should be 2

Imagine going back to the days where you could just enjoy the football! Even this morning news from ESPN Brazil indicated a former Brazilian FA lead is secretly controlling the CBF despite being banned by FIFA for corruption. With this comes further questions about why Edu from Arsenal continued to work with him despite this. This could all be harmless, but clubs are going to have to openly condemn it otherwise they are liable to be implicated. The Saturday 3pm and 90 minutes seems long gone.

This will come down to semantics, but I didn't realise this was the response to NUST from Masters where he refers to PIF as a company.

I'd be interested to know if during the talk around Spurs if Todd Boehly would have been involved namely through Eldridge Industries which have been previosuly mentioned by Keith as trying to do some investments with Saudi Arabia. A quick search indicates interest in Tottenham and Chelsea throughout 2019 - has links to the LA Dodgers, speculating another US based owner mixing in the same sporting circles as some of the current EPL owners prior to Project Big Picture and the ESL coming out it would be a no-brainer investment into the Premier League if you knew in advance of this plan.

If they have serious evidence the Premier League and/or clubs have acted improper is the best course of action to go through the process rather than this just be about the takeover? I mean as much as I'd like the takeover, if the evidence is damming then surely for the best result for a majority of clubs all the information should be shared rather than looking for an agreement to be reached?

Clearly a confident goalscorer, both finishes tonight he was composed. Really like him as a player, although wish he always had this level of service as would be 20+ goals a season

Probably wider considerations about investment in the city. If they have the football club then that value for money might be properties or investments for partners in the area leading to a greater return on that £350m initial contribution.

Same sentiments as I don't think he means any harm, but it's just poorly thought out. I also think basing feelings on following someone's tweets will ultimately lead to people feeling more disappointed. There hasn't been any takeover information of note for months, but every now and then he drops some cryptic teaser in.

B.16. In all matters and transactions relating to the League each Club shall behave towards each other Club and the League with the utmost good faith. B.17. No Person bound by these Rules, including any Club (either by itself, its registered Players, Officials, employees or agents), shall do any of the following: (a) conduct itself in an abusive, insulting, intimidating or offensive manner towards any (other) Club or the League or (where applicable in either case) any of its registered Players, Officials, employees or agents; (b) commit any act (or omission) or make any statement that is discriminatory by means of race, religion, gender, sexuality, colour or national or ethnic origin; or (c) commit any act (or omission) or make any statement that brings the League, its competition, a Club, a Broadcaster or a party to a Commercial Contract into disrepute.

It would be interesting if any other owners or directors had actually broke rules as per the current test for this season and in effect created a huge scenario about them being fit or purpose. Any familiar with the rules?!

Premier League wise as the twenty shareholders would be great if they put it too a vote...where 14 is the magic number and every other club turned against them!

I'm sure it was last season when he put Krafth CB against Kane which resulted in a pummelling. Glad lessons have been learnt...

Was it someone on here that mentioned RedBird Capital? Liverpool have seemingly benefitted from investment by them to go back to pre-COVID spending...

100% I'd guess he is fed information from a member of the playing squad as articles always lead with a view on how the squad or members of it feel about a decision i.e. a player being allowed to travel home for recovery, a bust up or argument. When Bruce said that fights happen up and down the country I'm sure they do. We've had Andy Griffin v Laurent Robert, Andy Carroll v Steven Taylor and I'm sure there will have been more over the years!

Just waiting for us to be flushed in all honesty. Across the club we've got incompetance at all levels that when we've had an employee that has wanted to push on they've found themself an outcast. Premier League football offers both financial and personal rewards so if you can get away with it and others are happy staying on the gravy train I'm sure you can get paid very well for being poor. The vast majority of people who watched that game yesterday knew it was a shocking performance and I doubt any of the players thought they had a good game after it. Bruce openly said it wasn't good enough, but the sticking point will always be no one ever challenges it. I couldn't imagine Bruce breaking down the performance with a technical or tactical analysis tomorrow and then working on the issues that have been clear to see. To a football fan it doesn't make sense, but Mike Ashley is not a football fan...this is the problem.

Worse performance than Riviere against Bournemouth in 2016?

Brighton to win 2-0.

We'd probabaly do better without a manager rather than with Bruce. Gut feeling is the damage has already been done, they won't make a change as resulted in relegation in the past anyway.

If we had lost that would they have sacked Bruce? He looked mightily relieved at the end!

He is good on the ball, occasional aspects of his play which let him down today - holding onto the ball too long before a pass or pass not reaching target. However feel sorry for him based on players either not looking to receive the ball which makes him look worse. I've been impressed and he's confident running at people. How would people compare him to Longstaff/s? I noticed Villa opted to play their home grown player over a loan player so it's interesting in our predicament we need to use bigger clubs youth players to improve the team!

You pay for what you get. I'm sure it was reported Bruce is on around £20,000 a week with a incentive based contract for finishing above the relegation zone. Surely they pay off would only be about £1.5m to get rid of him if he has a deal until June 2022?! It has to be one of the worst gambles Ashley is making with the club.

Watching the match you just know it will be repeated in the Championship next season.

The best thing to happen for him would be he resigns or is sacked. Imagine presiding over the relegation of your hometown club...even Carver managed to avoid that (just).