Interpolic

[spoiler=Here yee, SEMTEX]Stop fucking moaning, eh.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f4/Portsmouth_FC_90's_logo.png How could you, Disco?

What an absolutely ludicrous thing to say. Is Cisse then ludicrous too? What on Earth is the relevance of whether Cisse has touched money lent out by Wonga? Many factors he has refused to wear the shirt because of them despite every other muslim in the squad doing the opposite. Why can't have my own "belief" here? Whether he stays or goes he wants more wonga imo. You've lost me now like, sorry.

Makes perfect sense, doesn't it. Would be even better if we had the ambition to get a top manager. I doubt very much we sign players just to suit Pardew and to say top players only suit one system is mental. Gomis is a rounded striker that could plat up top alone, in a front two or in a front three. Not sure Gomis would suddenly become redundant if Pardew were to leave, just because he's big and strong.

What an absolutely ludicrous thing to say. Is Cisse then ludicrous too? What on Earth is the relevance of whether Cisse has touched money lent out by Wonga?

There's nowt wrong with getting a targetman, it doesn't automatically make it impossible to play decent football if Pardew's given the heave-ho and currently it's not working so not worth persevering with. Whether that means 2 up front or whatever I don't know, seems like Cisse's on his way anyway so not necessarily.

What an absolutely ludicrous thing to say.

Just to clarify, my brother detests the senile, old cunt.

He's been slow for about an hour man.

Does Steve Lomas still look like an absolute bell end?

He's watching the 3 players he mentioned. He's not suggesting all of our players are good at it, that's why it's one of our main training focuses at the minute. Well maybe if he played Marveaux a little more instead of putting f***ing Perch in, it wouldn't have been as bad. See i like this kind of post, it sums him up. Pardew says something and the reality is completely different. The bloke refuses to let the team play and then moans we don't play enough. What a cock. Pardew's obviously had a re-think over the Summer, he can only be proven a hypocrite on what he's currently saying after he's had his chance. True, doesn't explain playing hoofball in the friendly the other night though, of all the times to try something different it's then. He knows no other football, direct unlikable, percentage ugly, whatever you call it. He's a poor Fat Sam. It would seem illogical to me that he would set up to play passing football one match and then the antithesis the next. It may have possibly been other factors not in his control. I understand your frustration and where you're coming from but, personally, I'm prepared to give him a little bit more of a chance to see what he comes up with. Same really. If he believed 100% in negative, conservative football I don't see why he wouldn't just say something like that. I know the evidence of the football we've played isn't great, but let's see what he's learned this season. It benefits him massively to pretend he wants to play positively, as many people lap it up and decide he deserves more time. He's came out with these soundbites many times in the last few years. Possible I suppose. I wouldn't say it benefits him massively, but you're right that could be the reason. It does benefit him massively, if he said that his only intention was to play negative, conservative football he'd be hounded out of the club.

He's watching the 3 players he mentioned. He's not suggesting all of our players are good at it, that's why it's one of our main training focuses at the minute. Well maybe if he played Marveaux a little more instead of putting f***ing Perch in, it wouldn't have been as bad. See i like this kind of post, it sums him up. Pardew says something and the reality is completely different. The bloke refuses to let the team play and then moans we don't play enough. What a cock. Pardew's obviously had a re-think over the Summer, he can only be proven a hypocrite on what he's currently saying after he's had his chance. True, doesn't explain playing hoofball in the friendly the other night though, of all the times to try something different it's then. He knows no other football, direct unlikable, percentage ugly, whatever you call it. He's a poor Fat Sam. It would seem illogical to me that he would set up to play passing football one match and then the antithesis the next. It may have possibly been other factors not in his control. I understand your frustration and where you're coming from but, personally, I'm prepared to give him a little bit more of a chance to see what he comes up with. Same really. If he believed 100% in negative, conservative football I don't see why he wouldn't just say something like that. I know the evidence of the football we've played isn't great, but let's see what he's learned this season. It benefits him massively to pretend he wants to play positively, as many people lap it up and decide he deserves more time. He's came out with these soundbites many times in the last few years.

He's watching the 3 players he mentioned. He's not suggesting all of our players are good at it, that's why it's one of our main training focuses at the minute. Well maybe if he played Marveaux a little more instead of putting f***ing Perch in, it wouldn't have been as bad. See i like this kind of post, it sums him up. Pardew says something and the reality is completely different. The bloke refuses to let the team play and then moans we don't play enough. What a cock. Pardew's obviously had a re-think over the Summer, he can only be proven a hypocrite on what he's currently saying after he's had his chance. True, doesn't explain playing hoofball in the friendly the other night though, of all the times to try something different it's then. He knows no other football, direct unlikable, percentage ugly, whatever you call it. He's a poor Fat Sam. It would seem illogical to me that he would set up to play passing football one match and then the antithesis the next. It may have possibly been other factors not in his control. I understand your frustration and where you're coming from but, personally, I'm prepared to give him a little bit more of a chance to see what he comes up with. Same really. If he believed 100% in negative, conservative football I don't see why he wouldn't just say something like that. I know the evidence of the football we've played isn't great, but let's see what he's learned this season. It benefits him massively to pretend he wants to play positively, as many people lap it up and decide he deserves more time. He's came out with these soundbites many times in the last few years.

Hahaha Harford is thick, ugly and shit but it would appear he's not completely stupid. Could they not have done this behind the scenes and avert yet more embarrassment like?

I think he could but not under this klutz of a manager, he would look a lot better under Sir Bobby IMO. Speed was obviously the better player though. Not sure I'd agree that Speed was better. Speed was far, far more suited to the PL. He'd attack the ball, look to support the attack whenever he could, had a gorgeous range of passing and could tackle. Oh, I thought he meant Speed was better than Lee. I haven't seen enough from Cabaye yet to think he's better than either. Nah better than Cabaye mate, if you were to push me i'd say Lee is the best of the lot. Would be inclined to agree but it's very tight. Lee did a useful job as a holding player towards the end but prior to that he was one of the best all-round midfielders in the country. 2 exceptional NUFC servants.

I think he could but not under this klutz of a manager, he would look a lot better under Sir Bobby IMO. Speed was obviously the better player though. Not sure I'd agree that Speed was better. Speed was far, far more suited to the PL. He'd attack the ball, look to support the attack whenever he could, had a gorgeous range of passing and could tackle. Oh, I thought he meant Speed was better than Lee. I haven't seen enough from Cabaye yet to think he's better than either.

I think he could but not under this klutz of a manager, he would look a lot better under Sir Bobby IMO. Speed was obviously the better player though. Not sure I'd agree that Speed was better.

Pennywell Working Men's Club . Yeah. Oh, actually he's been at Millwall as a coach. Hope the compo isn't too hefty.

Did we have to fight off any other clubs to get Harford in?

Bent and Sissoko fighting it out for the number 10 role.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/fulham-join-newcastle-5million-darren-2071175

I can't believe this after we made Motherwell look ordinary the other night.

If true, and given there is only the one source, signing Gomis can only be a positive regardless of the short sightedness of our transfer policy (of which I totally agree with). It's never going to change though, if anything Carr busted his flush too early with his 'value signings'. Agree it would be a positive signing this chap, would still be surprised if we're significantly stronger in forward positions next year though. If Jonas lines up as winger for us again next year then someone wants shot. The Cisse thing is a fucking nightmare too.

I think you're both right actually, we don't have enough scouts and as a result they're told to stick to the markets where we've had some success in terms of value. It's baffling that we're so shortsighted but it's another thing to add to the list with this club at the minute. Can't be arsed with it anymore, people at work ask me about next season and I tell them 11/1 for us getting relegated is amazing value, otherwise I'd rather talk to them about their clubs like Chelsea or whoever the fuck it is. Totally losing interest, everything we do is flawed and unambitious.