Lazarus

Bet its not toxic either....

That low-res video makes him look like arseface from Preacher.

Eh? Battle Hill Forum was quite toxic in its day. The Emporer pub? Quite 'lively' i would say

One of the rueben brothers who has/had a 10% stake in the takeover. It may be significant because rules state you cant be a director at more than one club.....

One of these weeks HTT will proclaim 3pm friday and everyone will tell him where to go only for the announcement to be made

I think were being a bit hard on lascelles to be honest. Hes team captain. EVERY team captain toes the party line. Wouldnt surprise me if he was given his answers in a script prepared by bruce/charnley/barnes/ashley. Maybe the point of it was deflect some of the criticism onto him instead of bruce

And to think the PL were worried about the saudi state having undue influence... Talk about hypocrisy.

This. Its also an opportunity for the supporter groups to unite and be an opposing force. Time is of the essence.

Am i right in remembering that it was denied that the top teams had any influence over the saudi takeover bid? If they dont have any influence over the PL then why are they submitting plabs to 'reform' the league? Perhaps NUST could comment? Especially in light of this comment from the telegraph:

I thought you were going to stand ? Nah. Opted not too. Too left wing for you, tory scum?

Such is my current love of football ive no idea who these 2 are.

Is getting into arguments with people on twitter not real journalism? I thought real journalism was barging into court while a sex trial was underway?

Isnt just awful when someone tries to steal your thunder

Is he talking about bacon again?

Newport manager will be telling his team they can win this and laying out how to do it. Bruce will be telling his team to pull their socks up.

Ill be watching for the lolz

Bottom

'Steve bruce' and 'charisma' in the same sentence. Just think about that for a moment.

77% posession What in the wide wide world of sports is going on here.....

Lawyers aren't quick. They only confirmed involvement last week, so it'll be months before they say anything, if they do at all. Abramovich stuff has no relevance to this at all, other than showing some of his more suspect activities to the public...and the lack of pick up and fanfare about it shows it won't be deeply or publicly probed On the contrary, it shows that abramovich has no regard for the rules of the premier league - https://www.premierleague.com/news/597665. Therefore, could he reasonably be described as fit and proper?

Perhaps NUST could comment on chelsea ownership and abramovich breaking third party rules. They could even ask if in light of these allegations they will conduct another ownership test?

He a member of the board?

And stay fit.