Lazarus

Would love him back but dont think hes coming.

Theres definately a good player in there. People often dont seem to realise the influence a poor manager can have on individual performance, whether its football, sales, admin or whatever. Weve never really seen Lewis playing well as our only benchmark has been his performances this season.

I must be the only one who has enjoyed the bickering and off topic discussion. I think weve all posted shite in this thread at one point or another, which was inevitable given the length of time its gone on. If you dont like someones posts, use the ignore feature, its there for that specific reason.

Still think bruce is due a random win soon - if i had to guess id say leeds. theyll either win 6-0 or we'll fluke a 1-0 win.

Has the usurper arrived?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

He is overdue an enormous slice of luck

Is this paunchy mutton-snouted deformity still here?

Whats with her quick glances off to the left? Reminds me of hamanns nervous twitch

Geordies are never shy about letting a manager know what they think but I haven't heard any boos in their home games this season so he must be doing something right. - Paul Merson He said that? Not surprised. FFS :lol:

How so?

You should continue this with Bruces stats until today. Would be an interesting reading. Should be in the link youve quoted.....

Obviously if its another steve its gonna be a shitshow. as long as they know their way round the training pitch better than the canteen then im all for it.

Funny how hes gone from being the best centreback outside the england then being bruced, by the best centreback outside the england squad.

Cantervale Limited have also posted their accounts at companies house and PZ Newco are due with their confirmation statement. Be intersting to see what, if anything, is in those accounts.

No, it's just an annual filing requirement. It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close. So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed. Means f*** all other than the company is still 'live'. Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live? If the JV1 company was setup for the takeover and the takeover is now dead, then it may still be live for accounting purposes. Once the accounts are filed, the company may then close. Companies can also be made 'dormant' on companies house ie, the company still exists but isnt 'trading'. Of course the takeover could still be ongoing, hence the company is still live and 'trading'. And as i mentioned above, was it ever confirmed that JV1 was directly connected to the takeover? JV1 is owned by Cantervale holding limited which is in turn owned by Cantervale limited which is owned by Stavely. Even if it is and the takeover is dead, JV1 might be able to be used for other purposes by Stavely. But the filing of a confirmation statement in and of itself doesnt mean anything and isnt enough to speculate on the progress/status of the takeover. Are you just ignoring the charge made against Cantervile holdings by MASH for the £150 million loan and the fact it’s still outstanding. If it was dead it wouldn’t still be outstanding. Sorry, if thats the case then yes, it would imply the takeover is not entirely dead.

No, it's just an annual filing requirement. It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close. So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed. Means f*** all other than the company is still 'live'. Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live? Good question. If the deal were truly dead then the company should be wound up and dissolved. Thats assuming it was connected to the takeover in first place. Cant rememebr if JV1 was linked in any of the docs that leaked last year. JV1 if I remember is Joint Venture 1 a company set up by PCP/ Reuben Bros to facilitate the purchase of the club. If the deal was/is dead you would have thought the company would be dissolved. Aye - that was the theory, but i dont think there was ever a direct link.

No, it's just an annual filing requirement. It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close. So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed. Means f*** all other than the company is still 'live'. Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live? If the JV1 company was setup for the takeover and the takeover is now dead, then it may still be live for accounting purposes. Once the accounts are filed, the company may then close. Companies can also be made 'dormant' on companies house ie, the company still exists but isnt 'trading'. Of course the takeover could still be ongoing, hence the company is still live and 'trading'. And as i mentioned above, was it ever confirmed that JV1 was directly connected to the takeover? JV1 is owned by Cantervale holding limited which is in turn owned by Cantervale limited which is owned by Stavely. Even if it is and the takeover is dead, JV1 might be able to be used for other purposes by Stavely. But the filing of a confirmation statement in and of itself doesnt mean anything and isnt enough to speculate on the progress/status of the takeover.

No, it's just an annual filing requirement. It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close. So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed. Means f*** all other than the company is still 'live'. Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live? Good question. If the deal were truly dead then the company should be wound up and dissolved. Thats assuming it was connected to the takeover in first place. Cant rememebr if JV1 was linked in any of the docs that leaked last year.

No, it's just an annual filing requirement. It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close. So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed. Means fuck all other than the company is still 'live'.

So they werent offered a place at the trough in other words?

Its almost as if what you do on the training ground influences what you do on the pitch.

Something great about a player who just loves to fucking wallop the ball