Kid Icarus

What about literally every single other signing he's made?

Pahahahahaha!

Don't think Caicedo's was an obvious red, but Kulusevski's was long ban-worthy imo.

Now that is a red.

This is so there for Chelsea to win like. Spurs are insanely open

It's about 25% a red compared to the one he did on Gordon last season

Carragher just casually trying to get a player from a title contender sent off there

Awful to see that happen to a player as likeable as Romero.

I'd probably do the same if that happened to me like. You'd have to

Spurs more open than me and ye ma's relationship

Think you could make a case for them being in multiple categories based on how they're used and who with tbh. Eg I think Barnes can be a top 4 impact sub, an upper mid-table starter with good cover behind him, lower mid-table without. Half of them fit into future potential as well. My best attempt: Top 4: Isak Bruno Top 6: Botman (potentially top 4) Gordon (potentially top 4) Joelinton Barnes (top 4 impact, top 10 starter, I split the difference) Top 10: Hall (strong potential for top 4) Pope Willock (would be top 6 without fitness problems) Tonali (potentially top 4 but we're yet to see it here) Livramento (potentially top 4) Top 20: Schar (age only) Burn (age only) Trippier (age and circumstances) Longstaff Wilson (age and injuries) Kelly Murphy Targett (depends on injuries) Krafth Lascelles Below 20: Almiron Dubravka Future Prospects: Miley Unknown: Osula Future Prospects and Unknown aside I'd categorise top 20 onwards as not good enough or as useful squad players going forward.

Wew, too far.

Ignore the explicitly said "he can still improve" in favour of your made up implicitly said "he's part of the problem" by all means.

You can just imagine the silence after every time he suggested Southgate.

His ratio is 0.51 I have no deal with Isak, it's more getting annoyed at the idea that any suggestion he could improve is off-limits, when it's open season for everyone else regardless of their achievements at the club. He's missed a fair few huge chances, saying he could have done better isn't controversial. The same criticism applies to Gordon, he just doesn't have the record to excuse him as much.

No one said we did. He can improve his finishing, that's all. He's a 1 in 2 striker with all the tools to be closer to 1 in 1.

Not Staveley and Ghodoussi? That feels like when something changed about the atmosphere at the club.

We got to see our day with a wrongun. That's 3 points in my book.

Ratcliffe was a bit more of an unknown quantity then tbf. Seems cut from the same cloth as Ashworth now we know more. No honour among thieves and all that.

Thought the same but Ornstein's article says there's an agreement that it hasn't worked and that him leaving is mutual. That was my green light to go in two-footed.

Go on...personal reasons?

Would it be in bad taste to dig out the posts where we tried to warn Froggy?

He's completely ruined his reputation now, mind. 3 pivotal roles in as many years, failure at Man United and the whole email debacle. What a hapless nugget.