Tsunami Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 When we got back to 2-2 and had Man U rocking, instead of continuing to stand in the technical area egging his players on, he retreated to the dug out and we lost impetuous. He made some brave subs but he had little to lose and when we had the chance to go for the kill he sat down. He should have been acting like a loon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ElCid Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 His big test now is doing the right thing -- play Shelvey in his preferred position, continue to play Wijnaldum in the #10 role, DROP Colback for Anita/Saivet as the holding midfielder (assuming Tiote is sold), and Sissoko/Perez/Thauvin to play wings with Mitro up top. Just came in to post similar. Have a horrible feeling he'll play a combination of Saivet, Colback and Shelvey in the middle with Mitro, Sissoko and Wijnaldum as an advanced three. Usual safety first stuff is my assumption, really hope I'm wrong cause a couple of new signings and a convincing win could really change the mood after last night. Yeah you will be right - the usual safety stuff which actually means we don't score that many goals and yet concede at least one goal in just about every game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 When we got back to 2-2 and had Man U rocking, instead of continuing to stand in the technical area egging his players on, he retreated to the dug out and we lost impetuous. He made some brave subs but he had little to lose and when we had the chance to go for the kill he sat down. He should have been acting like a loon. Genuinely think he's afraid, or not used, to winning. I have also developed the same fear of winning when watching the McClaren NUFC. As soon as it was 2-2 I was shitting my pants and knew it was going to be 2-3 soon. And it was. Not once did I think we were going to go for the jugular. Him sitting down at 2-2 tells you everything about the way he views not just the game, but the way he lives his life: never go above the legal alcohol limit, never light a cigar and always belt up in the back. That sort of a fellow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 I have a strange feeling after a lifetime listening to Pardew, that when McClaren speaks he could actually be telling the truth Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 I like him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Big win and a big performance for him. First half was superb. Well done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Imagine if we'd signed Cabaye or Shelvey 5 months ago? We'd at least be in that lower mid-table group. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varadi Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 That first half was one of the best toon performances I've seen in a long time, and against a very good, in form side. Very encouraging signs that he might finally be getting his shit together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were shit apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were shit apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly shit without fail Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. I did, I gave him credit for moving Gouffran, his other decisions during the game were shit and he invited West Ham onto us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. At least he only makes 1 or 2 selection mistakes rather than 5 or 6 like Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. At least he only makes 1 or 2 selection mistakes rather than 5 or 6 like Pardew. Granted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just shite in game subs eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. I did, I gave him credit for moving Gouffran, his other decisions during the game were s*** and he invited West Ham onto us. There was more than that Mick. We were absolutely class first half, everything about is was bang on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Ah the balance police are back, dishing out credit where it's dues all over the shop. I've missed them since Pardew fucked off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just shite in game subs eh? Lots of positives yeah, but we were only commenting on his in game choices and I agree with Mick that they aided in inviting West Ham to come onto us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 There was more than that Mick. We were absolutely class first half, everything about is was bang on. I only criticised him for his substitutions because they could have been costly, he needs to improve his substitution because they are causing us problems and he regularly gets them wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Ah the balance police are back, dishing out credit where it's dues all over the shop. I've missed them since Pardew f***ed off. Aye, you're right. Everything's shite. Let's just not enjoy anything eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 I think he's probably being overly cautious due to our position tbh. Hopefully if we settle into some kind of form he'll start to take a few more risks if there's a chance it can change the game in our favour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just s**** in game subs eh? Lots of positives yeah, but we were only commenting on his in game choices and I agree with Mick that they aided in inviting West Ham to come onto us. And positives to mention? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. His in-match decisions were s*** apart from when he put Gouffran up front but even then I wouldn't have brought Gouffran on in the first place. They always are, utterly s*** without fail Howay man lads. Credit where it's due. At least be balanced. It's what I think. He is extremely cautious and imo makes selection mistakes week after week, be it starting 11 or subs. So no positives at all today? Just s**** in game subs eh? Lots of positives yeah, but we were only commenting on his in game choices and I agree with Mick that they aided in inviting West Ham to come onto us. I'm not even saying I disagree btw, but it isn't the first thing that springs to mind after today's great win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Nothing wrong with inviting them onto us if you can hit them with pace on the counter. For that reason alone, the Gouffran sub instead of Aarons was odd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now