Dave Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I don't know why people are so resentful of him choosing Chelsea instead of us. Unless you were a supporter, that's the decision that every professional player would make at the moment. Money over first team football? Hardly. maybe he had confidence in his ability to get a first team spot. He was never going to get in a Chelsea team in front of Ballack, Makelele, Essien, Lampard, Mikel. That's not confidence, it's delusion. Well either way, he's clearly showing now that first team football does matter to him. So much so that his agent is already mentioning a loyalty bonus from Chelsea when he leaves? Seems exactly like a money-grabbing twat to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaetihS Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 grrrr...not another grafter!! we need flair and creative players. dun care if they are lazy if they can come up with more than 10 assists a season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 In fact: Sidwell’s agent Eric Walters said: “He is in no rush to leave Chelsea. “There is a new manager coming in and he would at least like to meet with him over the next couple of weeks to discuss his future in person. “He is entitled to some compensation if Chelsea agree to part with him.” Sounds desperate for first-team football.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I think since that Bin Laden "link" they've just been itching to use "Newcastle" and "hijack" in the same headline. Nothing more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jawesome Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Booo, hisss, boooooo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swissmag Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I don't know why people are so resentful of him choosing Chelsea instead of us. Unless you were a supporter, that's the decision that every professional player would make at the moment. Money over first team football? Hardly. maybe he had confidence in his ability to get a first team spot. He was never going to get in a Chelsea team in front of Ballack, Makelele, Essien, Lampard, Mikel. That's not confidence, it's delusion. Well either way, he's clearly showing now that first team football does matter to him. So much so that his agent is already mentioning a loyalty bonus from Chelsea when he leaves? Seems exactly like a money-grabbing t*** to me. true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I don't know why people are so resentful of him choosing Chelsea instead of us. Unless you were a supporter, that's the decision that every professional player would make at the moment. Money over first team football? Hardly. maybe he had confidence in his ability to get a first team spot. He was never going to get in a Chelsea team in front of Ballack, Makelele, Essien, Lampard, Mikel. That's not confidence, it's delusion. Well either way, he's clearly showing now that first team football does matter to him. Good on him, give the lad a medal. Don't want Sidwell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzzieMandias Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I think since that Bin Laden "link" they've just been itching to use "Newcastle" and "hijack" in the same headline. Nothing more. So you reckon next it'll be "Newcastle to fly Arshavin into Empire State Building?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I think since that Bin Laden "link" they've just been itching to use "Newcastle" and "hijack" in the same headline. Nothing more. So you reckon next it'll be "Newcastle to fly Arshavin into Empire State Building?" Nah it'll be Newcastle sign Mido. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cfhpantera27 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. he is ginger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I don't know why people are so resentful of him choosing Chelsea instead of us. Unless you were a supporter, that's the decision that every professional player would make at the moment. Money over first team football? Hardly. Come on - he'd hardly be the first to do so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. Neither was speed mate. People are being far too simplistic about this. In my opinion Sidwell would make an excellent signing if we converted him into a DM, for the long term. i.e use coaching skills.... they haven't been used in a while at our club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. Neither was speed mate. People are being far too simplistic about this. In my opinion Sidwell would make an excellent signing if we converted him into a DM, for the long term. i.e use coaching skills.... they haven't been used in a while at our club. Rather go for a proper DMC than fitting square pegs in round holes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. Neither was speed mate. People are being far too simplistic about this. In my opinion Sidwell would make an excellent signing if we converted him into a DM, for the long term. i.e use coaching skills.... they haven't been used in a while at our club. Rather go for a proper DMC than fitting square pegs in round holes. rather go for two midfielders who done the lot (rob lee/roy keane stylee) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. Neither was speed mate. People are being far too simplistic about this. In my opinion Sidwell would make an excellent signing if we converted him into a DM, for the long term. i.e use coaching skills.... they haven't been used in a while at our club. agreed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nufc_geordie Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Simple decision, sign him, he would command a starting place and is better than what we have. Any improvement to the team must be taken if it is a viable option! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. Neither was speed mate. People are being far too simplistic about this. In my opinion Sidwell would make an excellent signing if we converted him into a DM, for the long term. i.e use coaching skills.... they haven't been used in a while at our club. Rather go for a proper DMC than fitting square pegs in round holes. Too simplistic, a) i just wanted to use the phrase 'ageing butt' and b) on numerous occasions last year, Butt was our best attacking player. When a player can defend, its really a massive advantage if they can attack too. I'd happily have a look at Sidwell in the middle of a central 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Not good enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Not good enough. All our midfielders are better? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Sidwell > Ageing Butt. Sidwell isn't a defensive midfielder. Neither was speed mate. People are being far too simplistic about this. In my opinion Sidwell would make an excellent signing if we converted him into a DM, for the long term. i.e use coaching skills.... they haven't been used in a while at our club. Rather go for a proper DMC than fitting square pegs in round holes. Too simplistic, a) i just wanted to use the phrase 'ageing butt' and b) on numerous occasions last year, Butt was our best attacking player. When a player can defend, its really a massive advantage if they can attack too. I'd happily have a look at Sidwell in the middle of a central 3. Wasn't he asking for £80k last time round? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobby_solano Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 £80k?! he's a funny guy. no wonder he got told to jog on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I'm embarasssed to admit I really have no opinion on Sidwell, is he good enough for us, would he fit in, would he offer us something more than we currently have. I have no bloody clue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Not good enough. All our midfielders are better? That approach really grates on me. At the time, Nelly the Elephant would have been a better option than Carr at right-back. Should we have signed her? Sidwell isn't a particularly great player, and in my opinion, centre-midfield is the position that we most desperately need to improve. Being simply 'better than what we've got' isn't an acceptable criteria for new signings if you ask me, unless it's entirely last resort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now