Jump to content

West Ham agree fee in region of £15m with Liverpool for Andy Carroll


Recommended Posts

Wish he'd get a haircut. Pleased for him though.

 

Look what happened to Matty "Zidane" Pattison when he got his hair cut  :no:

 

True, turned shit when he shaved that poodle off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Number 9 shirt should be given to the main striker at the club at that time. That happens to be Carroll at the minute so I've not got a problem with it at all.  It will always represent the state of the club at the time and the fact that it's now Andy Carroll speaks volumes about where we are as a club at the minute. This is where we are so let's just get on with it.

 

Best of luck to the lad. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

To some extent it suggests that we're not in the market for a new striker, which would be a big worry. Right now i'd say we're best off pairing Carroll and Shola, but I can't really see either hitting double figures.

 

But I have no problem with him getting the no.9 shirt. He was excellent in the latter half of last season and a big factor in us finishing first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To some extent it suggests that we're not in the market for a new striker, which would be a big worry. Right now i'd say we're best off pairing Carroll and Shola, but I can't really see either hitting double figures.

 

But I have no problem with him getting the no.9 shirt. He was excellent in the latter half of last season and a big factor in us finishing first.

 

I don't think Hughton was in the market for a 'traditional number 9' anyway. A second striker/new Lovenkrands i think we'd buy if we were buying a forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now i'd say we're best off pairing Carroll and Shola, but I can't really see either hitting double figures.

 

I disagree. I think pairing thsoe two regularly would be a disaster. Shola when under pressure turns into a statue. In the Premiership we'd have two target men standing around offering no movement and no pressure to opposition defenders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovenkrands is no second striker, he's a poacher. Which is exactly what we could do with, but a better one.

 

I know he's not. He has no guile at all unforunately. Meant more someone to place off the big man - poacher or '10'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shola is fine when he is focused, when he actually pull's his finger out and concentrates he can be a decent play.

 

Problem is we can be 5 goals down and he is sat there ambling around with a stupid grin on his face like a cheshire cat. Barton needs to have a word tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovenkrands is no Premier League striker. Shola isn't either, but he'll cause trouble for defenders on a regular basis. Lovenkrands just won't impose himself against top defenders.

 

32 goals in just short of 200 appearances in the Premier League suggests he won't like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...