dcmk Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Fans getting involved in ownership is not necessarily a bad thing, however i'm 100% convinced that our fans getting involved would be an absolute abortion of an idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Fans getting involved in ownership is not necessarily a bad thing, however i'm 100% convinced that our fans getting involved would be an absolute abortion of an idea. Well if they do take over now I think you can consider your catering firm boycoutted for any events they decide to hold! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Fans getting involved in ownership is not necessarily a bad thing, however i'm 100% convinced that our fans getting involved would be an absolute abortion of an idea. Well if they do take over now I think you can consider your catering firm boycoutted for any events they decide to hold! They'll get Greggs to do it anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiekev Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Fans getting involved in ownership is not necessarily a bad thing, however i'm 100% convinced that our fans getting involved would be an absolute abortion of an idea. Well if they do take over now I think you can consider your catering firm boycoutted for any events they decide to hold! They'll get Greggs to do it anyway. Squad full of Viduka's munching on Caramel Dougnuts and Pink Splits at half time (love asking for the pink splits btw "one with plenty cream inside" always gets a little blush from the gals behind the counter).. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 one of the reason's why the barcelona model works, is each board member must pay 2m euros to be on the board, means that only wealthy businessmen can be on it the last think i want here is a fan's buyout, i still blame those idiots at the hull game last season for quite a few of our problems Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 one of the reason's why the barcelona model works, is each board member must pay 2m euros to be on the board, means that only wealthy businessmen can be on it the last think i want here is a fan's buyout, i still blame those idiots at the hull game last season for quite a few of our problems well.. what problems did they cause? We realised we had a incompetent owner.. so he wanted to leave? you are blaming us for that?? Well in no particular order.. MA tried to sell the club, but his asking price was too high. He appointed JFK He didnt strengthen in January. The structure of the club was never clear. He sold our most valuable players. He had no contingency plan. He filled valuable positions like DoF with people with no experience. What did the fans do? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 The "5 interested parties story" could have come from one of the groups supposedly on the fringes of the discussions in an attempt to keep themselves in the picture, such as the consortium involving Graham Roberts or equally the one NUST are attaching themselves to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
binnsy Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 one of the reason's why the barcelona model works, is each board member must pay 2m euros to be on the board, means that only wealthy businessmen can be on it the last think i want here is a fan's buyout, i still blame those idiots at the hull game last season for quite a few of our problems who are these idiots you are blaming? NUST?? there was no NUSC or NUST when we played Hull so you can't blame them for what happened against Hull. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Wish we had Freddy Shephard still he was a mitn chairman. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiekev Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 What did the fans do? They spelt Boycott wrong, this in turn had a huge detrimental on our club and It's status in the Prem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Wish we had Freddy Shephard still he was a mitn chairman. He wasn't perfect but he was a million times better than Ashley's regime. Mort was decent then fucked off and it all went down hill... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Talksport - FIVE buyers in talks with Ashley But good old mike is going to accept the first offer isnt he. Honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 5 fictional buyers are better than none. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustynrg Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I wonder if these 5 include the two that put a 100 million bid on the table about 6 months ago? (seems like 6 months ago anyway). I wonder why they didn't take it up then? Llambias surely wasn't lying then was he? Or did he mean that 110%? Or am I getting his lies mixed up now? You see the problem people? We can't believe a word that comes out of any paper or television or anywhere until the deed is done. I'd rather believe Sillius tbh, at least he's entertaining. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 one of the reason's why the barcelona model works, is each board member must pay 2m euros to be on the board, means that only wealthy businessmen can be on it the last think i want here is a fan's buyout, i still blame those idiots at the hull game last season for quite a few of our problems who are these idiots you are blaming? NUST?? there was no NUSC or NUST when we played Hull so you can't blame them for what happened against Hull. no, i blame the idiots who protested in the middle of a football game, do you protest's outside, but when there is a football match on, watch and support your fucking team for christ sakes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 I wonder if these 5 include the two that put a 100 million bid on the table about 6 months ago? (seems like 6 months ago anyway). I wonder why they didn't take it up then? Llambias surely wasn't lying then was he? Or did he mean that 110%? Or am I getting his lies mixed up now? You see the problem people? We can't believe a word that comes out of any paper or television or anywhere until the deed is done. I'd rather believe Sillius tbh, at least he's entertaining. yes but then what are we going to talk about in international break? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 No news by the looks of it today! Fuck me Llabia is good at the 'lets confuse everyone with a few ficticious bidders' lines Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 just a rehash of a few months ago with the 5 bidders bollocks imho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 No news by the looks of it today! Fuck me Llabia is good at the 'lets confuse everyone with a few ficticious bidders' lines It's just another poker bluff from the casino man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ToonBart Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 come on sillius, word up! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thefishman Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 http://farm1.static.flickr.com/55/113830985_09f377146d.jpg More chance of that happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 So any substance to the reports "Barry Moat makes first official bid for NUFC"? ...or does the thread title need changing again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 What? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 What? Sorry, don't mind me. Was just bored and wondering if there has been any further clarification to the story that Moat had put the £100,000,000 on the table. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 What? He said, So any substance to the reports "Barry Moat makes first official bid for NUFC"? ...or does the thread title need changing again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts