Guest gggg Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 No longer in contention, big difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 'No longer'? So he was? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 - DOL no longer in contention - Hughton continues until JFK doctors note runs out - JFK is given managers job Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 This club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quayside Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 O' Leary probably made unreasonable demands like wanting to be paid a salary and having a first team squad of more than 9 players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrisjraby Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 Finally 42.1% of us can stop boiling our piss! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 It's not that great though, the fact we were negotiating in the first place means the takeover isn't any nearer and now we're just gonna get an even worse manager or maybe Hughton will stay on! I'd honestly rather keep Hughton than have O'Leary here. Actually, I'd sooner take Ossie Ardiles than O'Leary! You're both mad. We've never won a game with Hughton in charge, him being in charge for only 9 games last season got us relegated for fuck sake, he's the anti manager and made Kinnear look top class Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 We did, WBA. But I agree with you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsley Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 It's not that great though, the fact we were negotiating in the first place means the takeover isn't any nearer and now we're just gonna get an even worse manager or maybe Hughton will stay on! I'd honestly rather keep Hughton than have O'Leary here. Actually, I'd sooner take Ossie Ardiles than O'Leary! You're both mad. We've never won a game with Hughton in charge, him being in charge for only 9 games last season got us relegated for f*** sake, he's the anti manager and made Kinnear look top class Wrong, we beat West Brom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN Breaking news: Don't believe anything we say as we now as much as you, we just have fancy travel budgets so we can stand in front of Stadiums making you think we know, when really we just check the BBC webiste every 2 mins and use Tribalfootball for our rumours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 - DOL no longer in contention - Hughton continues until JFK doctors note runs out - JFK is given managers job FFS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN Breaking news: Don't believe anything we say as we now as much as you, we just have fancy travel budgets so we can stand in front of Stadiums making you think we know, when really we just check the BBC webiste every 2 mins and use Tribalfootball for our rumours. They tend to get pretty good info tbh, given that David Craig is lodged firmly up Derek Llambias' arse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 It's not that great though, the fact we were negotiating in the first place means the takeover isn't any nearer and now we're just gonna get an even worse manager or maybe Hughton will stay on! I'd honestly rather keep Hughton than have O'Leary here. Actually, I'd sooner take Ossie Ardiles than O'Leary! You're both mad. We've never won a game with Hughton in charge, him being in charge for only 9 games last season got us relegated for f*** sake, he's the anti manager and made Kinnear look top class Wrong, we beat West Brom. I'm well aware he sat in the dugout during that match. But given the situation I've never given him credit for that win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooonDoom Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 So any manager you says I will need a,b,c to do the job and be successful gets turned down. Any one why says I will bend over and get fucked week by week gets the job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN Breaking news: Don't believe anything we say as we now as much as you, we just have fancy travel budgets so we can stand in front of Stadiums making you think we know, when really we just check the BBC webiste every 2 mins and use Tribalfootball for our rumours. They tend to get pretty good info tbh, given that David Craig is lodged firmly up Derek Llambias' arse. They don't really need good info tbh. I'm sure most of us knew this was bulshit from the start, and whichever names are bandied about it will come back to good old Joe in the end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 anybody. but. kinnear...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN Breaking news: Don't believe anything we say as we now as much as you, we just have fancy travel budgets so we can stand in front of Stadiums making you think we know, when really we just check the BBC webiste every 2 mins and use Tribalfootball for our rumours. They tend to get pretty good info tbh, given that David Craig is lodged firmly up Derek Llambias' arse. They don't really need good info tbh. I'm sure most of us knew this was bulshit from the start, and whichever names are bandied about it will come back to good old Joe in the end. If it was bullshit from the start, why would anyone word it 'no longer in contention'? Wouldn't 'never been approached' be more suitable? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemmy Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 So any manager you says I will need a,b,c to do the job and be successful gets turned down. Any one why says I will bend over and get f***ed week by week gets the job. I think you you've got the recruitment strategy nailed on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazzaA2 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 All I can say is the club best have someone good lined up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN Breaking news: Don't believe anything we say as we now as much as you, we just have fancy travel budgets so we can stand in front of Stadiums making you think we know, when really we just check the BBC webiste every 2 mins and use Tribalfootball for our rumours. They tend to get pretty good info tbh, given that David Craig is lodged firmly up Derek Llambias' arse. They don't really need good info tbh. I'm sure most of us knew this was bulshit from the start, and whichever names are bandied about it will come back to good old Joe in the end. If it was bullshit from the start, why would anyone word it 'no longer in contention'? Wouldn't 'never been approached' be more suitable? Covers their own backs for running with the O'Leary story in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Boy Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 All Dave O'Leary can say is the club best have someone good lined up fyp Dave Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN Breaking news: Don't believe anything we say as we now as much as you, we just have fancy travel budgets so we can stand in front of Stadiums making you think we know, when really we just check the BBC webiste every 2 mins and use Tribalfootball for our rumours. They tend to get pretty good info tbh, given that David Craig is lodged firmly up Derek Llambias' arse. They don't really need good info tbh. I'm sure most of us knew this was bulshit from the start, and whichever names are bandied about it will come back to good old Joe in the end. If it was bullshit from the start, why would anyone word it 'no longer in contention'? Wouldn't 'never been approached' be more suitable? Covers the medias backs for running the O'Leary story in the first place. Fair comment, but did SSN ever actually go with this? Dunno. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN saying they have the inside track on this 'developing story' coming up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN saying they have the inside track on this 'developing story' coming up *tunes in* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 SSN saying they have the inside track on this 'developing story' coming up Good lord, someone put us out of our misery. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now