Dave Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 Never mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 TOON ARMY! Please say they scrapped that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonarmy Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 TOON ARMY! Please say they scrapped that? I'm still here! Don't scrap me! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 That back is fucking foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 Would Northern Rock have any say over how the logo is produced or just define the font etc? Can't see them being right impressed at how cheap and nasty it looks. Why it needs the black box around it I do not know. Could have went back to the gold NR logo which stood out and looked classy imo. This: http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/javaImages/6f/ae/0,,10341~6401647,00.jpg Liked this shirt, it's the home one I wear still, didn't like the last one or this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 http://www.kitbag.com/stores/kitbag/artwork/english/banners/football/newcastle-top-banner.jpg Lovenkrands seems high. Is Alan Smith wearing slippers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broonalegeordie Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 http://www.kitbag.com/stores/kitbag/artwork/english/banners/football/newcastle-top-banner.jpg whats with the faggot painting his toes and the other queer with the teddy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 Please stop quoting that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 Doesnt look like there are any stripes on the back (going off the above pic)? When was the last time we didnt had a shirt like that? Its horrible, we need to have black and white strips on both sides man we're Newcastle! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broonalegeordie Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 the stripes are in his shorts man... am sure there is a small patch of stripes at the bottom Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 Smith may actually score with some slippers on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 It's actually looking like Smith's reminiscing about the days he used to venture that far forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 http://www.kitbag.com/stores/kitbag/artwork/english/banners/football/newcastle-top-banner.jpg whats with the faggot painting his toes and the other queer with the teddy Don't forget Smitty's slippers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 For fucks sake, stop it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Just what the fuck is that picture all about? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Page 98 lacks some http://www.kitbag.com/stores/kitbag/artwork/english/banners/football/newcastle-top-banner.jpg action. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 why would you pose for any of that if you were a millionairre professional footballer? photographer: "hi peter, can you just hold this teddy bear and look at it like you want to have sex with it please?" peter: "get fucked i'm off to play golf" is how it should have went still the quality of the photo is weird and none of it looks right, wouldn't surprise me if it was a Photoshop job all round - the whole thing just doesn't sit right or look right... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 why would you pose for any of that if you were a millionairre professional footballer? photographer: "hi peter, can you just hold this teddy bear and look at it like you want to have sex with it please?" peter: "get fucked i'm off to play golf" is how it should have went still the quality of the photo is weird and none of it looks right, wouldn't surprise me if it was a Photoshop job all round - the whole thing just doesn't sit right or look right... Why else do people do things at work? It will be in their contracts that they have to so stuff like this when asked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 why would you pose for any of that if you were a millionairre professional footballer? photographer: "hi peter, can you just hold this teddy bear and look at it like you want to have sex with it please?" peter: "get fucked i'm off to play golf" is how it should have went still the quality of the photo is weird and none of it looks right, wouldn't surprise me if it was a Photoshop job all round - the whole thing just doesn't sit right or look right... Why else do people do things at work? It will be in their contracts that they have to so stuff like this when asked. but jesus yeah, being asked to pose is one thing - to pose pissing around with another footballers feet and playing with a teddy bear? maaaaaaan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 why would you pose for any of that if you were a millionairre professional footballer? photographer: "hi peter, can you just hold this teddy bear and look at it like you want to have sex with it please?" peter: "get f***ed i'm off to play golf" is how it should have went still the quality of the photo is weird and none of it looks right, wouldn't surprise me if it was a Photoshop job all round - the whole thing just doesn't sit right or look right... For all you know, it could be a lucky teddy given to him by his kids. At the end of the day, I couldn't give a Castlemaine XXXX if they pose in Ann Summers posing pouches. In all fairness, they could spend their time in the dressing room giving each other reach-arounds and perfecting the patented Ashley Cole "vibrophone" prostate orgasm. We've got confirmation of the kit and that's all what counts. And on a general note: the kit looks fine. Quit bitching. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobby_solano Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 so it's argie 'jonas 17' shirts allround next season then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 I don't get why people are complaining about the advertising like. At least there is some level of effort with it compared to the normal shit. Normally all we get is three shit fat players stood in a row, nothing additional. Unfortunately, they seem to have put a lot more effort into advertising the product than designing it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Ha ha, the mongs that run our club. You've just got to laugh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 I don't get why people are complaining about the advertising like. At least there is some level of effort with it compared to the normal s***. Normally all we get is three s*** fat players stood in a row, nothing additional. Unfortunately, they seem to have put a lot more effort into advertising the product than designing it. It's meant to show a "human" side of the players. Do people really expect that footballers *don't* wear slippers or comfy footwear in the training room prior to a game or that they don't have lucky bears etc. that their kids have given to them? Furthermore, would anyone be surprised if, given his eating habits, Kevin Nolan *wouldn't* be tempted to eat his own toenails prior to a game, in lieu of there being no lard available. Our home kit is a poisoned chalice. I remember people hating the granddad shirt when it came out, despite it now being regarded as one of our best kits of all time. Whilst there are things I'd change, at least a completely white back looks better than a half-arsed patch. One thing I have noticed is that Puma have opted for a baggy, rather than athletic, template shape - presumably because of our fans are tucky bastards! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 I think the back isn't all white and has stripes at the bottom mind you.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now