James Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 This rule change should go above any others such as goal line technology in my opinion. Can't blame Suarez for what he did, I would, but common sense must win out. Doesn't rugby do similar? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 No, don't think this should be brought in. A penalty and a red card will do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 This rule change should go above any others such as goal line technology in my opinion. Can't blame Suarez for what he did, I would, but common sense must win out. Doesn't rugby do similar? You're allowed to use your hands in rugby you daft twat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Would be fine with me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 This rule change should go above any others such as goal line technology in my opinion. Can't blame Suarez for what he did, I would, but common sense must win out. Doesn't rugby do similar? You're allowed to use your hands in rugby you daft twat. merked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 This rule change should go above any others such as goal line technology in my opinion. Can't blame Suarez for what he did, I would, but common sense must win out. Doesn't rugby do similar? You're allowed to use your hands in rugby you daft twat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 This rule change should go above any others such as goal line technology in my opinion. Can't blame Suarez for what he did, I would, but common sense must win out. Doesn't rugby do similar? You're allowed to use your hands in rugby you daft twat. You know what I'm referring to, don't be smarmy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 yes plus a yellow card Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 What if there's someone behind the person who handballs whose abdomen/knee/weenus would have stopped the shot. Still award it or goal kick? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 What if there's someone behind the person who handballs whose abdomen/knee/weenus would have stopped the shot. Still award it or goal kick? Would have to be beyond doubt that it was going in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 What if there's someone behind the person who handballs whose abdomen/knee/weenus would have stopped the shot. Still award it or goal kick? but there wasn't. i think we can be quite sure if he hadn't handled it would have went in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 No. Ridiculous idea for me. If you're shit at penalties then that's your fault. Even in the event of a miss you've still got the rest of the match with a 1 man advantage (not much use in tonight's game like, but then, rules aren't based on single matches for a reason) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 No, it's literally one of the most stupid football-related ideas I've ever heard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 No. Ridiculous idea for me. If you're s*** at penalties then that's your fault. Even in the event of a miss you've still got the rest of the match with a 1 man advantage (not much use in tonight's game like, but then, rules aren't based on single matches for a reason) the original header was good enough to go in, shouldn't have had to take a penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 This rule change should go above any others such as goal line technology in my opinion. Can't blame Suarez for what he did, I would, but common sense must win out. Doesn't rugby do similar? You're allowed to use your hands in rugby you daft t***. Great work LLLO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Keep it as it is. A red card and a pen is about as harsh as it gets. Normally, the attacking team wouls core the goal and nothing would be said, just so happens that Uruguay got away with it and suddenly everyone's up in arms wanting to change the rules and award penalty goals?? Nah. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 I'm with madras on this, the header was defiently going in it shouldn't be left to chance if the opposition gain an advantage or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 How often does it happen to necessitate a rule change? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 I'm with madras on this, the header was defiently going in it shouldn't be left to chance if the opposition gain an advantage or not. It's not chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 I'm with madras on this, the header was defiently going in it shouldn't be left to chance if the opposition gain an advantage or not. Chance? Do they have to take the penalty blindfolded? What about the guy being sent off? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Keep it as it is. A red card and a pen is about as harsh as it gets. Normally, the attacking team wouls core the goal and nothing would be said, just so happens that Uruguay got away with it and suddenly everyone's up in arms wanting to change the rules and award penalty goals?? Nah. People might as well invent a new sport, all these rule changes they want. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 What if there's someone behind the person who handballs whose abdomen/knee/weenus would have stopped the shot. Still award it or goal kick? but there wasn't. i think we can be quite sure if he hadn't handled it would have went in. I think he is talking about a hypothetical situation which he is correct about. You'd need to be 100% certain it is going in to award a goal, which would be very difficult without the benefit of video replay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveMc Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 Weenus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 So goals for when a player is clean through and gets taken down aswell then? Sure fuck it, lets just award goals when someone hits the post or bar, I mean it's really close. Fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now