Jump to content

John Carver


Guest neesy111

Recommended Posts

My passion has been somewhat revived, even though it wasn't a conscious decision by the club to remove Pardew. So if Carver gets the job, I'll be disappointed but I'm desperate to start supporting the club again. Pardew's removal does open that gate for me again, even if something as utterly shit as Carver getting the job happens. Supporting Newcastle is part of my personal identity and it's hurt to have lost some of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Chronicle always have an agenda when it comes to our managerial appointments. They will always want someone that they think they can work with.

 

Look at how they pushed Carver for the assistant manager in the first place.

 

The idea of having a highly professional foreign manager who does not know who Lee Ryder is, and won't be passing on exclusive stories does not appeal to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My passion has been somewhat revived, even though it wasn't a conscious decision by the club to remove Pardew. So if Carver gets the job, I'll be disappointed but I'm desperate to start supporting the club again. Pardew's removal does open that gate for me again, even if something as utterly s*** as Carver getting the job happens. Supporting Newcastle is part of my personal identity and it's hurt to have lost some of that.

 

I'm not so sure - Carver/Stone/Woodman are no better than Pardew. If we're left with them we're just as fucked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My passion has been somewhat revived, even though it wasn't a conscious decision by the club to remove Pardew. So if Carver gets the job, I'll be disappointed but I'm desperate to start supporting the club again. Pardew's removal does open that gate for me again, even if something as utterly s*** as Carver getting the job happens. Supporting Newcastle is part of my personal identity and it's hurt to have lost some of that.

 

I'm not so sure - Carver/Stone/Woodman are no better than Pardew. If we're left with them we're just as f***ed.

 

I'm 50/50. I really don't want them, but if we give them to the end of the season I'm willing to support them until the 40p barrier is reached. Then I'll hate on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My passion has been somewhat revived, even though it wasn't a conscious decision by the club to remove Pardew. So if Carver gets the job, I'll be disappointed but I'm desperate to start supporting the club again. Pardew's removal does open that gate for me again, even if something as utterly s*** as Carver getting the job happens. Supporting Newcastle is part of my personal identity and it's hurt to have lost some of that.

 

I'm not so sure - Carver/Stone/Woodman are no better than Pardew. If we're left with them we're just as fucked.

 

They're different. That's (just barely) good enough for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Season's dead anyway. We won't get relegated, we're out all the cups and we've just terminated the contract of our most watchable player. Would be a perfect time to introduce a new manager with new methods but we'll doubtless continue with Carver pretending he knows what 'data' is and shouting incomprehensible mung guff until we reach summer and promptly do nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/john-carver-would-mad-not-8380476

In the game against Burnley, I thought for 45 minutes we played some really good football. The physical data has since come back and Burnley overran us. We had no legs in the team.

 

And so it begins. I mean, continues.

 

I am speechless :lol:

 

"I think we played well but these numbers here say we didn't so we must play more grafters."

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/john-carver-would-mad-not-8380476

In the game against Burnley, I thought for 45 minutes we played some really good football. The physical data has since come back and Burnley overran us. We had no legs in the team.

 

And so it begins. I mean, continues.

 

I am speechless :lol:

 

"I think we played well but these numbers here say we didn't so we must play more grafters."

 

I didn't need to look at "physical data" stats whatthefuckever, I just used my eyes and watched the game and noticed they were all over us. I hate the way they rely on the data when all they need to do is open their fucking eyes. The data is useful perhaps for deep troubleshooting where something has gone wrong, however most our problems are simple ad basic organisation, tactical mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data is very useful in performance analysis, but to undermine its value looking for how far people ran just defeats the point of it (in this case). Use that data for preseason ffs. In a match you look for why and when players run- that's something data can't accurately define.

 

Of course why would we want to look at passes failed/completed, opposition crosses, our possession in defensive and attacking 1/3....f***ing dinosaur. People like JC keep the English disease rampant in the game at the top level. Possibly the saddest thing about what he said is that a lot of our fans will lap that up and think, 'Aye, he's got the passion like, making sure people proper graft man'. f*** off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...