TRon Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Why didn't Villa sign Marveaux as well as Zog as well then? Not to mention they should have been in for Cabaye and Ba seeing as they were all available cheap. Give over man. Are you just going to ignore the players who have come in? People are arguing why we didn't sign Zog and I don't see if we can make all these signings what was stopping Villa? Haven't they sold a shit load of players for big money? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Dear god.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 N'Zogbia would have been a much better signing than Marveaux in my opinion. Well in a way that remains to be seen, Marveaux might have a really good season. I know what you're saying though, but the problem is that Marveaux was cheap and Zoggy costs money. Thus if you're worried about expenditure he's a less attractive option. FWIW I would rather have had Zog because he is proven. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Obviously Wigan were still waiting for offers from various clubs because they thought the demand was high, back in June. The situation changes drastically since then, because we've gone for Marveaux and Liverpool signed Downing. Sunderland cannot afford the fees and therefore only Villa left. It did worth pointing out that Marveaux could be the first priority for Liverpool instead of Downing. We didn't have to wait, we already knew that N'Zogbia was going to be sold. I don't see what Liverpool going for Marveaux ahead of Downing has to do with anything as we don't know how they came about prioritising targets. We knew N'Zogbia was going to be sold, but the negotiation could drag on and on for a long time if there's a bidding war. Actually that could have been happened already (there were rumours that Wigan received several bids even though they denied). In the end Newcastle went for Marveaux, Liverpool then went for Downing, and Villa becomes the last bidder. The key point is, Villa only made the bid after the Downing deal. That means before Villa's bid, all the other clubs didn't make a bid or failed to agree a price with Wigan. Is this just a coincidence that no club made a bid before Villa for N'Zogbia, a deal that now everyone thinks a good deal? My guess is Wigan was asking for too much before and forced to lower the price because Villa is the only one left in the market. In other words, Spurs, Arsenal and other top clubs are not interested in N'Zogbia. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Consortium of one Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 N'Zogbia would have been a much better signing than Marveaux in my opinion. Well in a way that remains to be seen, Marveaux might have a really good season. I know what you're saying though, but the problem is that Marveaux was cheap and Zoggy costs money. Thus if you're worried about expenditure he's a less attractive option. FWIW I would rather have had Zog because he is proven. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Are you just going to ignore the players who have come in? People are arguing why we didn't sign Zog and I don't see if we can make all these signings what was stopping Villa? Haven't they sold a s*** load of players for big money? Maybe Villa didn't think the players we've signed are as good as the players they want to sign. Personally, I would rather sign N'Zogbia who is a proven player in this league, over Marveaux who may or may not be eble to handle the Premiership. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Why didn't Villa sign Marveaux as well as Zog as well then? Not to mention they should have been in for Cabaye and Ba seeing as they were all available cheap. Give over man. Are you just going to ignore the players who have come in? People are arguing why we didn't sign Zog and I don't see if we can make all these signings what was stopping Villa? Haven't they sold a shit load of players for big money? If you looked at our forums and what people were saying recently, and still are in some cases, "look at Newcastle, they've got players in, we're doing nothing but get rid of them" was one of the most frequently heard things. Transfer window open = paranoia, delusion, misunderstanding and anger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 N'Zogbia would have been a much better signing than Marveaux in my opinion. Well in a way that remains to be seen, Marveaux might have a really good season. I know what you're saying though, but the problem is that Marveaux was cheap and Zoggy costs money. Thus if you're worried about expenditure he's a less attractive option. FWIW I would rather have had Zog because he is proven. Same here. I would prefer N'Zogbia over Marveaux if I can conclude both deals at the same time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Why didn't Villa sign Marveaux as well as Zog as well then? Not to mention they should have been in for Cabaye and Ba seeing as they were all available cheap. Give over man. Are you just going to ignore the players who have come in? People are arguing why we didn't sign Zog and I don't see if we can make all these signings what was stopping Villa? Haven't they sold a shit load of players for big money? If you looked at our forums and what people were saying recently, and still are in some cases, "look at Newcastle, they've got players in, we're doing nothing but get rid of them" was one of the most frequently heard things. Transfer window open = paranoia, delusion, misunderstanding and anger. Yeah, I can report that most fans of other clubs think we have made some great signings. And they also think that West Ham were mental to give that deal to Nolan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 We knew N'Zogbia was going to be sold, but the negotiation could drag on and on for a long time if there's a bidding war. Actually that could have been happened already (there were rumours that Wigan received several bids even though they denied). In the end Newcastle went for Marveaux, Liverpool then went for Downing, and Villa becomes the last bidder. The key point is, Villa only made the bid after the Downing deal. That means before Villa's bid, all the other clubs didn't make a bid or failed to agree a price with Wigan. Is this just a coincidence that no club made a bid before Villa for N'Zogbia, a deal that now everyone thinks a good deal? My guess is Wigan was asking for too much before and forced to lower the price because Villa is the only one left in the market. In other words, Spurs, Arsenal and other top clubs are not interested in N'Zogbia. You said we couldn't wait for N'Zogbia yet it looks like he's going after a chain of events which we wouldn't have needed before bidding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 N'Zogbia would have been a much better signing than Marveaux in my opinion. Well in a way that remains to be seen, Marveaux might have a really good season. I know what you're saying though, but the problem is that Marveaux was cheap and Zoggy costs money. Thus if you're worried about expenditure he's a less attractive option. FWIW I would rather have had Zog because he is proven. They are relatively similar players. On the left Marveaux plays as a traditional winger, will still come in field. On the right expect to see him cutting inside and shooting/laying balls off for Ben Arfa/Ba. Marveaux looks better than Zoggy centrally, but isn't that Ben Arfa's position? My concern for Marveaux remains the same, injuries. Especially when you consider he has signed a five-year deal. They are both 25 years old, N'Zogbia has made 158 career league starts, Marveaux has made 62... He is a big gamble, but probably one worth taking (on a shorter contract). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 We knew N'Zogbia was going to be sold, but the negotiation could drag on and on for a long time if there's a bidding war. Actually that could have been happened already (there were rumours that Wigan received several bids even though they denied). In the end Newcastle went for Marveaux, Liverpool then went for Downing, and Villa becomes the last bidder. The key point is, Villa only made the bid after the Downing deal. That means before Villa's bid, all the other clubs didn't make a bid or failed to agree a price with Wigan. Is this just a coincidence that no club made a bid before Villa for N'Zogbia, a deal that now everyone thinks a good deal? My guess is Wigan was asking for too much before and forced to lower the price because Villa is the only one left in the market. In other words, Spurs, Arsenal and other top clubs are not interested in N'Zogbia. You said we couldn't wait for N'Zogbia yet it looks like he's going after a chain of events which we wouldn't have needed before bidding. No, we have to wait and there is risk involved. Who can guarantee N'Zogbia will sign for us if Wigan accept several bids? The worst scenario is we missed out both Marveaux and N'Zogbia. Thus at that time you have to decide either wrap up the Marveaux deal or face a bidding war for N'Zogbia. I can understand why the club choose Marveaux. What the club could do, at that time, was to submit an offer of 10m to Wigan, saying this is the last offer and if you did not respond before midnight then that's it because we would sign a replacement tomorrow. This might be done already, I don't know, but it didn't materialize. It's debatable whether we should sign both players, but if it's mutually exclusive, then I couldn't blame the club for choosing Marveaux. I could only blame Wigan for being too greedy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 We're all disappointed we didn't sign him, but in a way I feel that a lot of people are overrating him. That's understandable given that he put two past us and then went on a ridiculous run of form towards the tail-end of the season when everyone was watching. Regardless, he was hardly setting the league alight all season and was really just the best player on a poor Wigan team. I've no doubt he'd improve us, but not signing him is not the end of the world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 We knew N'Zogbia was going to be sold, but the negotiation could drag on and on for a long time if there's a bidding war. Actually that could have been happened already (there were rumours that Wigan received several bids even though they denied). In the end Newcastle went for Marveaux, Liverpool then went for Downing, and Villa becomes the last bidder. The key point is, Villa only made the bid after the Downing deal. That means before Villa's bid, all the other clubs didn't make a bid or failed to agree a price with Wigan. Is this just a coincidence that no club made a bid before Villa for N'Zogbia, a deal that now everyone thinks a good deal? My guess is Wigan was asking for too much before and forced to lower the price because Villa is the only one left in the market. In other words, Spurs, Arsenal and other top clubs are not interested in N'Zogbia. You said we couldn't wait for N'Zogbia yet it looks like he's going after a chain of events which we wouldn't have needed before bidding. No, we have to wait and there is risk involved. Who can guarantee N'Zogbia will sign for us if Wigan accept several bids? The worst scenario is we missed out both Marveaux and N'Zogbia. Thus at that time you have to decide either wrap up the Marveaux deal or face a bidding war for N'Zogbia. I can understand why the club choose Marveaux. What the club could do, at that time, was to submit an offer of 10m to Wigan, saying this is the last offer and if you did not respond before midnight then that's it because we would sign a replacement tomorrow. This might be done already, I don't know, but it didn't materialize. It's debatable whether we should sign both players, but if it's mutually exclusive, then I couldn't blame the club for choosing Marveaux. I could only blame Wigan for being too greedy. Greedy? You can't blame them for wanting to get the best price possible for the player who almost single-handedly kept them up last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 No, we have to wait and there is risk involved. Who can guarantee N'Zogbia will sign for us if Wigan accept several bids? The worst scenario is we missed out both Marveaux and N'Zogbia. Thus at that time you have to decide either wrap up the Marveaux deal or face a bidding war for N'Zogbia. I can understand why the club choose Marveaux. What the club could do, at that time, was to submit an offer of 10m to Wigan, saying this is the last offer and if you did not respond before midnight then that's it because we would sign a replacement tomorrow. This might be done already, I don't know, but it didn't materialize. It's debatable whether we should sign both players, but if it's mutually exclusive, then I couldn't blame the club for choosing Marveaux. I could only blame Wigan for being too greedy. I still don't see why we had to wait to bid for N'Zogbia but we might as well leave it at that because we've both got differing opinions and I guess we don't understand each others. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Marveaux may go onto have a great season and improve the team greatly. With N'Zogbia, there's no question that he would. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Marveaux may go onto have a great season and improve the team greatly. With N'Zogbia, there's no question that he would. Are you suggesting we 'go compare' the two? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Why didn't Villa sign Marveaux as well as Zog as well then? Not to mention they should have been in for Cabaye and Ba seeing as they were all available cheap. Give over man. Are you just going to ignore the players who have come in? People are arguing why we didn't sign Zog and I don't see if we can make all these signings what was stopping Villa? Haven't they sold a shit load of players for big money? If you looked at our forums and what people were saying recently, and still are in some cases, "look at Newcastle, they've got players in, we're doing nothing but get rid of them" was one of the most frequently heard things. Transfer window open = paranoia, delusion, misunderstanding and anger. That was my point even though it seems beyond some people's comprehension. That's not to say Zog wouldn't have been a good signing, but knowing our lot if we'd spent that much on him we wouldn't still be in for Erdinc. I said it way back in this thread that I couldn't see us signing Marveaux and Erdinc then still going ahead and signing Zog. The daft thing is I was one of the most vocal critics of the decision to sell him at the time. It's not like I wouldn't want him here but you have to look at the bigger picture. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 We've replaced our losses have we? Can't see a good enough Carroll replacement myself. We needed two strikers before we sold him in January. Nor can I see a decent enough Enrique replacement when he finally f***s off. Although I'm not surprised some can't understand what Villa are doing. Losing a left winger and spending the money to replace him with a quality left winger. How crazy!? If N'Zogbia goes through, they'll have brought in 2 players (Given being the other) for £12.5m. They have lost 10 players (including around 5 first teamers) for a combined total of £36m this window alone. If you are including Carroll, then you also have to include Ben Arfa as part of the winter window. This window we have so far brought in 4 in while losing one first teamer. Let's see where we both stand at the end of the window, but as it stands now, yes I can see what they are doing, cost cutting to a far greater extent than we are, and not in a better position than when the window opened. So what am I missing that Villa are doing Jonny? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Marveaux may go onto have a great season and improve the team greatly. With N'Zogbia, there's no question that he would. Nobody is arguing with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 So what am I missing that Villa are doing Jonny? Buying proven Premiership footballers for a start. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 So what am I missing that Villa are doing Jonny? Buying proven Premiership footballers for a start. Fair enough, so have we in Ba at least. They have lost more proven Premiership footballers than we have so far though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Carroll >* Ba. Downing <= N'Zogbia That's what Villa are doing that we aren't. *IMO, before anyone comes out with "Well how much have you seen of Ba?!?!??" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Fair enough, so have we in Ba at least. They have lost more proven Premiership footballers than we have so far though. Ba has played 12 games in this country, N'Zogbia over 200. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Young? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now