Jump to content

Yohan Cabaye


Guest

Recommended Posts

Cabaye could have gone, but we it looks like we wanted that £20m which nobody was interested in paying.

 

We only sell for more than they are worth and we only bid for less than they are worth. Complete hypocrisy of a transfer policy really aimed at maximizing money over getting the best player in for the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically we're struggling to get players over the line either way.

 

What a mess we are :lol:

Do we even know where the line is that these players have to cross?

 

As far as I can tell its either a soft core porno or an album by the Bellamy Brothers.. stay tuned David Craig will have an update..

 

This may help

 

http://en.academic.ru/pictures/enwiki/79/Over_the_line_court.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabaye could have gone, but we it looks like we wanted that £20m which nobody was interested in paying.

 

We only sell for more than they are worth and we only bid for less than they are worth. Complete hypocrisy of a transfer policy really aimed at maximizing money over getting the best player in for the team.

This is, sadly, spot on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

We only sell for more than they are worth and we only bid for less than they are worth. Complete hypocrisy of a transfer policy really aimed at maximizing money over getting the best player in for the team.

 

I dont blame them for that tbh. This window has seen teams drastically overpay, whilst some get great bargains. I can see why theyd have their cake and eat it. My problem is their stubbornness with negotiations and that we've gone too far with the French Revolution. And theres no ambition to ever achieve something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically we're struggling to get players over the line either way.

 

What a mess we are :lol:

 

First player over the line today

 

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/11/10/article-1084563-0018F7B100000258-765_468x300.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chicken little

We only sell for more than they are worth and we only bid for less than they are worth. Complete hypocrisy of a transfer policy really aimed at maximizing money over getting the best player in for the team.

 

utterly preposterous overstatement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabaye could have gone, but we it looks like we wanted that £20m which nobody was interested in paying.

 

We only sell for more than they are worth and we only bid for less than they are worth. Complete hypocrisy of a transfer policy really aimed at maximizing money over getting the best player in for the team.

This is, sadly, spot on.

 

Course it's correct, but surely trying to get a better deal for yourself than you give to your competitors is a completely good thing for the club?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shouldn't you be happy when we are driving a hard bargain for the sale of our assets?  Can't see how anyone would attack them for trying to fleece some mug club.  Not really hypocrisy to want to make more on a player than he is worth and spend less on a player than he's valued.

 

The really annoying thing is the absolute rigidity of the system though.  It's fucked us more often than not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Gold has spoken recently of the need to increase revenue to allow for more money to be spent on wages. This is due to Financial Fair Play. You can only spend a certain percentage of your clubs turnover on wages. Perhaps this has something to do with our one in, one out policy at the moment. Although, you'd imagine our revenue would be good enough to allow for further movement.

 

If Cabaye stays, I hope he gets his head down and plays well. This whole thing isn't finished though, not unless the club go against the grain and show some ambition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Gold has spoken recently of the need to increase revenue to allow for more money to be spent on wages. This is due to Financial Fair Play. You can only spend a certain percentage of your clubs turnover on wages. Perhaps this has something to do with our one in, one out policy at the moment. Although, you'd imagine our revenue would be good enough to allow for further movement.

 

If Cabaye stays, I hope he gets his head down and plays well. This whole thing isn't finished though, not unless the club go against the grain and show some ambition.

right someone explain those rules to Spurs and Sunderland as they would have massively increased their wage bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Gold has spoken recently of the need to increase revenue to allow for more money to be spent on wages. This is due to Financial Fair Play. You can only spend a certain percentage of your clubs turnover on wages. Perhaps this has something to do with our one in, one out policy at the moment. Although, you'd imagine our revenue would be good enough to allow for further movement.

 

If Cabaye stays, I hope he gets his head down and plays well. This whole thing isn't finished though, not unless the club go against the grain and show some ambition.

right someone explain those rules to Spurs and Sunderland as they would have massively increased their wage bill

 

Have Spurs though? Sold Bale, Caulker, Huddlestone, Parker and Dempsey. Sunderland have sold Mignolet, Elmohamady, McClean and Kilgallon.

 

Impossible to say how much they have increased their wage bills as anything mentioned in the media is speculation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Gold has spoken recently of the need to increase revenue to allow for more money to be spent on wages. This is due to Financial Fair Play. You can only spend a certain percentage of your clubs turnover on wages. Perhaps this has something to do with our one in, one out policy at the moment. Although, you'd imagine our revenue would be good enough to allow for further movement.

 

If Cabaye stays, I hope he gets his head down and plays well. This whole thing isn't finished though, not unless the club go against the grain and show some ambition.

right someone explain those rules to Spurs and Sunderland as they would have massively increased their wage bill

 

Have Spurs though? Sold Bale, Caulker, Huddlestone, Parker and Dempsey. Sunderland have sold Mignolet, Elmohamady, McClean and Kilgallon.

 

Impossible to say how much they have increased their wage bills as anything mentioned in the media is speculation.

Spurs broke their transfer record 3 times, its a reasonable assumption those new players are getting paid more than the previous lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Gold has spoken recently of the need to increase revenue to allow for more money to be spent on wages. This is due to Financial Fair Play. You can only spend a certain percentage of your clubs turnover on wages. Perhaps this has something to do with our one in, one out policy at the moment. Although, you'd imagine our revenue would be good enough to allow for further movement.

 

If Cabaye stays, I hope he gets his head down and plays well. This whole thing isn't finished though, not unless the club go against the grain and show some ambition.

right someone explain those rules to Spurs and Sunderland as they would have massively increased their wage bill

 

Have Spurs though? Sold Bale, Caulker, Huddlestone, Parker and Dempsey. Sunderland have sold Mignolet, Elmohamady, McClean and Kilgallon.

 

Impossible to say how much they have increased their wage bills as anything mentioned in the media is speculation.

Spurs broke their transfer record 3 times, its a reasonable assumption those new players are getting paid more than the previous lot

 

Perhaps they were spending below what they were allowed to before, or have increased their revenue sufficiently?

 

I can imagine our own revenue has a lot of potential to grow. We could definitely be doing a lot better in that regard.

 

Just an idea really, I'm bored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

David Gold has spoken recently of the need to increase revenue to allow for more money to be spent on wages. This is due to Financial Fair Play. You can only spend a certain percentage of your clubs turnover on wages. Perhaps this has something to do with our one in, one out policy at the moment. Although, you'd imagine our revenue would be good enough to allow for further movement.

 

If Cabaye stays, I hope he gets his head down and plays well. This whole thing isn't finished though, not unless the club go against the grain and show some ambition.

Something I was thinking earlier. But then we have lost, Harper, Guthrie, and Perch. We have only brought in Remy so you would have to think that we must have been close or on par with our budget at the end of last season.

 

The club have been saying that they want to bring in new faces though, so therefor those statements would contradict the possibility of us being on our percentage of turnover. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...