Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Gaztoon said:

Klopp will be all over that.


I’d be very surprised if Liverpool don’t have or didn’t have similar clauses in the likes of Mane & Van Dijk’s.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like an exaggeration, 25m is the total success-based bonus, not just for one Premier league win

 

As per a report by Football Insider, the initial cost for Manchester City is believed to be £75 million with a further £25 million attached as success-based incentives.



These incentives would typically cover aspects such as Premier League title wins, Champions League wins, as well as overall appearances made by Jack Grealish at Manchester City during his time with the club.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:


I’d be very surprised if Liverpool don’t have or didn’t have similar clauses in the likes of Mane & Van Dijk’s.

 

Most do I would imagine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gaztoon said:

 

Most do I would imagine.


Should do what they do in Spain, basically offer the Villa players millions if they win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Optimistic Nut said:


Should do what they do in Spain, basically offer the Villa players millions if they win.

 

Didn't man utd want 12m for lingard if we stayed up.. its crazy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Manxst said:


Jesus. :lol:

 

Given how well Fraser did the 6 weeks after the window ended there’s no guarantees we’d have went on the run that we did straight away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, NE27 said:

Have I missed his point? Genuine question btw.

He’s trying to say that previous owners didn’t do this (as he allegedly couldn’t find any pictures), and so is presumably suggesting that the current owners must be using the walkabout as a photo opportunity for nefarious (sportswashing) purposes…

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NE27 said:

Have I missed his point? Genuine question btw.

 

I think he's implying that the new owners are hogging spotlight they shouldn't be in, despite everyone being able to pretty quickly show him SJH also doing these laps back in the day.

 

Unfortunately he's worded it ambiguously enough that he can just play dumb to those accusations and state it was a genuine question, even though everyone knows he's just being an antagonistic prick which is exactly why it'd be better if these people just got no engagement at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, NE27 said:

Have I missed his point? Genuine question btw.

 

I imagine its him having a go at the owners for being on the pitch after the match on Monday, claiming the usual sportswashing patter. Then he's tweeted that after obviously not searching for any pictures of SJH on the pitch when chairman to gaslight followers into thinking SJH never did that but the Saudi linked owners have done to prove further sportswashing shite.

 

He's now just been shown up as a bell end by the countless pictures of SJH with fans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, xLiaaamx said:

 

Dig at Staveley/Reuben/Ghoudoussi for going on pitch Monday. Second dig at Reuben this week.


Shows what a shit reporter he is, there are plenty of photos of Hall on the pitch during the Keegan years. Trying to make a point that something didn't happen (to have a go at the current ownership ), when the evidence is readily available, is laughable journalism.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve mentioned this before, but I would grudgingly respect Tariq and Delaney’s views on sportswashing if they have been wholly consistent on the matter all the way through. But they haven’t, it doesn’t take a scrupulous search to see both we’re deafeningly quiet on Abramovich for years, even complimentary in some cases, until the prevailing political winds made that untenable.

 

Tariq in particular seems to have a personal vendetta against Staveley, and by extension Howe.

 

 

Edited by TheInfiniteOdyssey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon

I'm not bothered if people have genuine worries/concerns or not in favour. But fucking shit like that is really scraping the desperation barrel and just makes them look like the petty little cunts they are.

 

Absolute shit effort by the utter whopper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Journalism, for the most part, is now about clicks and interactions instead of meticulous research and informed opinions.

 

The owners will be criticised for almost anything but that is a ridiculous dig that only shows he has no idea in the first place. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...