Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If that was true why haven't Spurs made a bid? They only have one quality striker who is on loan and they could never afford his wages to sign him full time.

 

Transfer fee is too low for 'Arry.  He wouldn't get much of a cut from it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest WashyGeordie

Why don't we just announce all the players Spurs has with a release clause in their contract (if any - hopefully someone, and then unsettle them)... Prick.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest WashyGeordie

Getting £35 million for Carroll wont be looking to clever if we lost Ba for less than £7 million.

 

If it's even true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't we just announce all the players Spurs has with a release clause in their contract (if any - hopefully someone, and then unsettle them)... Prick.

 

Even if they don't.

 

AP "It's quite common for players to have release clauses in their contracts but most of the time it isn't made public, if people knew there was a £38m release clause in Modric's contract and £32m in Bales then I'd expect extra interest in those players. Oops, now its public, i really regret saying that now"

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest WashyGeordie

Wouldn't be surprised if he's being fed info by some West Ham connections.

 

Or Ashley (apparent Spurs fan)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...