AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Fingers crossed. Knowing our luck our next sponsor will be the British National Party. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Talk of Wonga pulling out. http://www.cityam.com/1412125255/wonga-set-ditch-its-newcastle-united-sponsorship-deal-after-crash-profits? No great surprise - we're damaging to their brand profile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 That Wonga thing is months old. They are cutting back massively on TV advertising and rebranding so its only natural they would cut ties with us too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Fingers crossed. Knowing our luck our next sponsor will be the British National Party. We know exactly who it'll be. http://www.voucherbox.co.uk/images/shop/sports-direct/SportsDirectLogo%281%29.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 It genuinely would get a very poor mark for GCSE graphics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianovthetoon Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 One other factor to consider here is if we were a middle of the road Premier League team with no back page headlines (good or bad) it takes him and his tat brand out of the spotlight a little. If we're in the news albeit through controversy we're still making headlines, therefore his tat emporium stays in the news. Same as if he really was considering selling us. It wouldn't surprise me to see a condition of anyh sale that the SD advertising has to stay for a specified period, and he might even sign a 10 year shirt sponsorship deal before he sells us. Guess who wins again....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 What, another 10 years of £0 received, I don't think it would cost that much to pay off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianovthetoon Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Difference is if it was part of the purchase price, it would be difficult to wiggle out of..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 If it was that it would at least be easy to create some iron on 'Sack Pardew.com' patches to put over the top of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/527/247/7b7.gif Worse gif ever. That's why I love it so much Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I don't see why he would sell if he can keep us in the Premier League and make a profit. Same. I'm pretty certain he wont sell then, I think he'll float us on the stock market again. Run us like SD where he has enough control to decide who the sponsor etc is but have someone else run us day to day but using only money the club makes and not a penny more from him. He'll have paid himself back what it cost him to buy us, he wont have to take any responsibility about how the club is run, hiring managers etc, he'll be able to continue to push his SD brand and he can pick up a dividend/bonus from the club every now and again and make more money selling the rest of his shares at a later date. Getting to that point will probably take the time frame suggested. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I don't see why he would sell if he can keep us in the Premier League and make a profit. Same. I'm pretty certain he wont sell then, I think he'll float us on the stock market again. Run us like SD where he has enough control to decide who the sponsor etc is but have someone else run us day to day but using only money the club makes and not a penny more from him. He'll have paid himself back what it cost him to buy us, he wont have to take any responsibility about how the club is run, hiring managers etc, he'll be able to continue to push his SD brand and he can pick up a dividend/bonus from the club every now and again and make more money selling the rest of his shares at a later date. Getting to that point will probably take the time frame suggested. I would take that setup TBH, provided the chairman was someone with half a brain about football. I.e not Joe Kinnear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I don't see why he would sell if he can keep us in the Premier League and make a profit. Same. I'm pretty certain he wont sell then, I think he'll float us on the stock market again. Run us like SD where he has enough control to decide who the sponsor etc is but have someone else run us day to day but using only money the club makes and not a penny more from him. He'll have paid himself back what it cost him to buy us, he wont have to take any responsibility about how the club is run, hiring managers etc, he'll be able to continue to push his SD brand and he can pick up a dividend/bonus from the club every now and again and make more money selling the rest of his shares at a later date. Getting to that point will probably take the time frame suggested. I would take that setup TBH, provided the chairman was someone with half a brain about football. I.e not Joe Kinnear. Guess that would be up to the new board/ shareholders Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 You know things are bad when Wonga ditch you as sponsor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Lonsdale it is then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Sondico Trackie bottoms for everyone! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'd be all over firetrap Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I'd be all over firetrap Such class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 as if Ashley was big time enough to own tapout Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Does he own Dunlop? that would be mint Is that why he looks tired. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Does he own Dunlop? that would be mint Dunlop Sports, aye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Donnay Socks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Little is known of Ashley's private life today. He is known to prefer casual dress of shirt and chinos or a track suit rather than a suit, and often carries his essential business tool of a mobile phone in a plastic carrier bag rather than a briefcase That phone bit can not be true He not heard of pockets? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 No fear (of relegation) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 No fear (of relegation) He must be the only one. No thanks to playing teams like Rotherham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts