quayside Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I've seen enough apparently useless football sides, enough bad patches, enough freak runs of form and enough players go from godlike talent to apparent Parkinson's though, to know that at the top level it can be a lot harder than it would seem to perform really well, and that confidence plays an enormous role. This is definitely a big part of the problem. For all the talk of "just play 4-3-3!" and "just move Cisse inside!" it's just not that simple when the players are feeling like a dehydrated dog staring at an Arabian puddle. The biggest problem I have with Pardew is that this has been going on for months and I have no faith at all in him turning the confidence/morale issue around. He couldn't at other clubs and it's looking like he can't here. The confidence issue was summed up for me by the Everton game. At 1-0 up we had several chances, hit the post and had an extremely good shout for a penalty turned down. You could almost smell what was going to happen next, Poor decision by Atkinson gives them a free kick followed by a wonder strike from Baines just before half time. In the end they walk off with a win but there was nothing between the teams except that they are on a roll and full of confidence and er... we aren't. Almost a re-run of last season's game at SJP only then we had the confidence and won 2-1 with a "fortuitous" own goal from Heitinger and a worldy from Ryan Tayor. Momentum does that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I've seen enough apparently useless football sides, enough bad patches, enough freak runs of form and enough players go from godlike talent to apparent Parkinson's though, to know that at the top level it can be a lot harder than it would seem to perform really well, and that confidence plays an enormous role. This is definitely a big part of the problem. For all the talk of "just play 4-3-3!" and "just move Cisse inside!" it's just not that simple when the players are feeling like a dehydrated dog staring at an Arabian puddle. The biggest problem I have with Pardew is that this has been going on for months and I have no faith at all in him turning the confidence/morale issue around. He couldn't at other clubs and it's looking like he can't here. The confidence issue was summed up for me by the Everton game. At 1-0 up we had several chances, hit the post and had an extremely good shout for a penalty turned down. You could almost smell what was going to happen next, Poor decision by Atkinson gives them a free kick followed by a wonder strike from Baines just before half time. In the end they walk off with a win but there was nothing between the teams except that they are on a roll and full of confidence and er... we aren't. Almost a re-run of last season's game at SJP only then we had the confidence and won 2-1 with a "fortuitous" own goal from Heitinger and a worldy from Ryan Tayor. Momentum does that. These thin lines are so important. We genuinely looked the better side for a lot for he Everton game, then the non-freekick and Baines wonder goal swung it. I think we're due for a couple of good results TBH, these next three games are insanely important. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I've seen enough apparently useless football sides, enough bad patches, enough freak runs of form and enough players go from godlike talent to apparent Parkinson's though, to know that at the top level it can be a lot harder than it would seem to perform really well, and that confidence plays an enormous role. This is definitely a big part of the problem. For all the talk of "just play 4-3-3!" and "just move Cisse inside!" it's just not that simple when the players are feeling like a dehydrated dog staring at an Arabian puddle. The biggest problem I have with Pardew is that this has been going on for months and I have no faith at all in him turning the confidence/morale issue around. He couldn't at other clubs and it's looking like he can't here. The confidence issue was summed up for me by the Everton game. At 1-0 up we had several chances, hit the post and had an extremely good shout for a penalty turned down. You could almost smell what was going to happen next, Poor decision by Atkinson gives them a free kick followed by a wonder strike from Baines just before half time. In the end they walk off with a win but there was nothing between the teams except that they are on a roll and full of confidence and er... we aren't. Almost a re-run of last season's game at SJP only then we had the confidence and won 2-1 with a "fortuitous" own goal from Heitinger and a worldy from Ryan Tayor. Momentum does that. What were these 'several chances'? Apart from the Perch header I don't remember us troubling them. I thought we lacked quality and looked like we had no idea how to break them down other than to hoof it to shola. We can't afford to play without cabaye and hba. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Flash Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I've seen enough apparently useless football sides, enough bad patches, enough freak runs of form and enough players go from godlike talent to apparent Parkinson's though, to know that at the top level it can be a lot harder than it would seem to perform really well, and that confidence plays an enormous role. This is definitely a big part of the problem. For all the talk of "just play 4-3-3!" and "just move Cisse inside!" it's just not that simple when the players are feeling like a dehydrated dog staring at an Arabian puddle. The biggest problem I have with Pardew is that this has been going on for months and I have no faith at all in him turning the confidence/morale issue around. He couldn't at other clubs and it's looking like he can't here. The confidence issue was summed up for me by the Everton game. At 1-0 up we had several chances, hit the post and had an extremely good shout for a penalty turned down. You could almost smell what was going to happen next, Poor decision by Atkinson gives them a free kick followed by a wonder strike from Baines just before half time. In the end they walk off with a win but there was nothing between the teams except that they are on a roll and full of confidence and er... we aren't. Almost a re-run of last season's game at SJP only then we had the confidence and won 2-1 with a "fortuitous" own goal from Heitinger and a worldy from Ryan Tayor. Momentum does that. What were these 'several chances'? Apart from the Perch header I don't remember us troubling them. I thought we lacked quality and looked like we had no idea how to break them down other than to hoof it to shola. We can't afford to play without cabaye and hba. Off the top of my head, Shola, Santon and Obertan should have done better with chances in the second half. Everton could have had 4 or 5 themselves, of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I think playing Cisse upfront will see us create more chances tbf, obviously having Ben Arfa and Cabaye in the side will increase that, but Cisse's movement will be a massive plus for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tollemache Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So I suppose I'd tend to back Ian W to an extent. Perhaps go a little further and speculate, to the possible agreement of Interpolic, that it is possible that all of this stems from something as trivial as a debate over whether or not to accommodate Demba Ba. I think a couple of injuries and a nagging issue or two like that really can be enough to tip a team over the edge. And when those couple of injuries include the two key creative reference points in your side... Problems. As you'll possibly have noticed by now, I'm a lot more pro-Ashley and pro-Pardew than most because I see signs of what I think is exactly the right way to run a football club emerging after years of embarrassing Shepherd madness, and I'm loath to write that prospect off until the grim death because it is exactly what the club has been crying out for for a long, long time. I'll forgive a run of shitty form, a dud transfer window, a bit of hoofball, a baffling decision and even a slightly uninspirational manager quite happily if it means we end up a soundly-run, upwardly mobile outfit in a few years and I can see it happening. Look at the calibre of our best XI for Christ's sake. If we somehow get it wrong and go down I'll be heartbroken because it will most likely be ripped apart but I think if you can't see that this administration is our best chance for ages at being a proper club you need your head checking. Whatever they're doing wrong, they're doing a lot right. I'm waffling and my pint is getting warm so cheers Yeah me too. But we have an owner that just don´t care about the success, and a manager that just isn´t good enough to take us to the top. That makes it all even more frustrating because I agree that in many ways we do have a good structure. We would just need a owner that would care a little bit more, and a manager that is a little bit better. Who put the structure in place? The owner. Why? Because he wants his club to do well as a business. What is the best way, and arguably the only way, to bring that about? If the club is successful. What is good for him is good for us, because we want a club that runs properly and has money. Regardless of whether or not Ashley gives a flying f*** about the football (and reputedly he does), he's not only heavily incentivised to make us a successful club, he's taken all of the steps towards that that you say you appreciate. In this case, saying that the structure is great apart from the owner makes no sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I've seen enough apparently useless football sides, enough bad patches, enough freak runs of form and enough players go from godlike talent to apparent Parkinson's though, to know that at the top level it can be a lot harder than it would seem to perform really well, and that confidence plays an enormous role. This is definitely a big part of the problem. For all the talk of "just play 4-3-3!" and "just move Cisse inside!" it's just not that simple when the players are feeling like a dehydrated dog staring at an Arabian puddle. The biggest problem I have with Pardew is that this has been going on for months and I have no faith at all in him turning the confidence/morale issue around. He couldn't at other clubs and it's looking like he can't here. The confidence issue was summed up for me by the Everton game. At 1-0 up we had several chances, hit the post and had an extremely good shout for a penalty turned down. You could almost smell what was going to happen next, Poor decision by Atkinson gives them a free kick followed by a wonder strike from Baines just before half time. In the end they walk off with a win but there was nothing between the teams except that they are on a roll and full of confidence and er... we aren't. Almost a re-run of last season's game at SJP only then we had the confidence and won 2-1 with a "fortuitous" own goal from Heitinger and a worldy from Ryan Tayor. Momentum does that. What were these 'several chances'? Apart from the Perch header I don't remember us troubling them. I thought we lacked quality and looked like we had no idea how to break them down other than to hoof it to shola. We can't afford to play without cabaye and hba. Off the top of my head, Shola, Santon and Obertan should have done better with chances in the second half. Everton could have had 4 or 5 themselves, of course. That's second half, apparently we had several chances at 1-0. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Flash Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So I suppose I'd tend to back Ian W to an extent. Perhaps go a little further and speculate, to the possible agreement of Interpolic, that it is possible that all of this stems from something as trivial as a debate over whether or not to accommodate Demba Ba. I think a couple of injuries and a nagging issue or two like that really can be enough to tip a team over the edge. And when those couple of injuries include the two key creative reference points in your side... Problems. As you'll possibly have noticed by now, I'm a lot more pro-Ashley and pro-Pardew than most because I see signs of what I think is exactly the right way to run a football club emerging after years of embarrassing Shepherd madness, and I'm loath to write that prospect off until the grim death because it is exactly what the club has been crying out for for a long, long time. I'll forgive a run of shitty form, a dud transfer window, a bit of hoofball, a baffling decision and even a slightly uninspirational manager quite happily if it means we end up a soundly-run, upwardly mobile outfit in a few years and I can see it happening. Look at the calibre of our best XI for Christ's sake. If we somehow get it wrong and go down I'll be heartbroken because it will most likely be ripped apart but I think if you can't see that this administration is our best chance for ages at being a proper club you need your head checking. Whatever they're doing wrong, they're doing a lot right. I'm waffling and my pint is getting warm so cheers Yeah me too. But we have an owner that just don´t care about the success, and a manager that just isn´t good enough to take us to the top. That makes it all even more frustrating because I agree that in many ways we do have a good structure. We would just need a owner that would care a little bit more, and a manager that is a little bit better. Who put the structure in place? The owner. Why? Because he wants his club to do well as a business. What is the best way, and arguably the only way, to bring that about? If the club is successful. Regardless of whether or not Ashley gives a flying f*** about the football (and reputedly he does), he's not only heavily incentivised to make us a successful club, he's taken all of the steps towards that that you say you appreciate. In this case, saying that the structure is great apart from the owner makes no sense. Ashley etc need to learn how to strike a balance between business sense and football sense. It's pointless having a well run business financially if it can't compete in the marketplace. It'd be a massive step forward for us if they could do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Everything in the last page is sensible stuff, well thought out, and i might say very well put. But, i know i can't stand Pardew now, i will not hide that. Someone needs to explain to me why after 18 months our set pieces are still absolutely embarrassing, even a Sunday League team could come up with something better. We are a Premier League team who have no idea how to take a corner or free kick, that is solely down to the manager, 100%. Now if that isn't a big enough worry, which i think is a major one. A manager who can't come with anything is a massive problem. Now i hate Pardew for using long ball, as its my pet hate in football. Forget formations as 4-4-2/4-3-3 really aren't the issue, we play better using 4-3-3 but thats by the by. The lack of any cohesive passing or movement is just plain awful. I noted that someone said that he's seen enough football to know a bad run when he sees one. Well my football watching has cost me two lovely ladies, Mrs Bimpy to her credit accepts that i will watch any football i can. Now i think i'm qualified a bit to note, that the goals we're giving away are usually the sign a manager has begun to lose his team. Confidence is low and that will reflect in results, of course it will. But we have a manager who as a limited ability, an ability that he thinks is far better that it is. Give him better players he will get better results, even i'm convinced of that. Long term though. Set pieces !! if there was ever a reason for doubting the managers ability, its them. There is not an excuse in the world, not one minuscule excuse to explain the wretchedness of them after 18 months, of which i've had to watch 250 corners and god knows how many free kicks. We have threatened the opposition goal no more than 4 or 5 times. That is enough for me, Pardew is limited and always will be, despite having a fantastic chance not to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tollemache Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So I suppose I'd tend to back Ian W to an extent. Perhaps go a little further and speculate, to the possible agreement of Interpolic, that it is possible that all of this stems from something as trivial as a debate over whether or not to accommodate Demba Ba. I think a couple of injuries and a nagging issue or two like that really can be enough to tip a team over the edge. And when those couple of injuries include the two key creative reference points in your side... Problems. As you'll possibly have noticed by now, I'm a lot more pro-Ashley and pro-Pardew than most because I see signs of what I think is exactly the right way to run a football club emerging after years of embarrassing Shepherd madness, and I'm loath to write that prospect off until the grim death because it is exactly what the club has been crying out for for a long, long time. I'll forgive a run of shitty form, a dud transfer window, a bit of hoofball, a baffling decision and even a slightly uninspirational manager quite happily if it means we end up a soundly-run, upwardly mobile outfit in a few years and I can see it happening. Look at the calibre of our best XI for Christ's sake. If we somehow get it wrong and go down I'll be heartbroken because it will most likely be ripped apart but I think if you can't see that this administration is our best chance for ages at being a proper club you need your head checking. Whatever they're doing wrong, they're doing a lot right. I'm waffling and my pint is getting warm so cheers Yeah me too. But we have an owner that just don´t care about the success, and a manager that just isn´t good enough to take us to the top. That makes it all even more frustrating because I agree that in many ways we do have a good structure. We would just need a owner that would care a little bit more, and a manager that is a little bit better. Who put the structure in place? The owner. Why? Because he wants his club to do well as a business. What is the best way, and arguably the only way, to bring that about? If the club is successful. Regardless of whether or not Ashley gives a flying f*** about the football (and reputedly he does), he's not only heavily incentivised to make us a successful club, he's taken all of the steps towards that that you say you appreciate. In this case, saying that the structure is great apart from the owner makes no sense. Ashley etc need to learn how to strike a balance between business sense and football sense. It's pointless having a well run business financially if it can't compete in the marketplace. It'd be a massive step forward for us if they could do that. We just bought France's first choice right back? In what sense are we not competing in the marketplace? If you mean we're not splashing the same cash as clubs in stronger positions than us, not paying whatever it takes to get our targets, then you do not want the best for the club and you should consider lobbying for the return of effing Freddie Shepherd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So the only options are: 1. Run the club tight as fuck like Mike Ashley. 2. Run the club irresponsible as fuck like Freddy Shepherd. Righto. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tollemache Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Totally agree about set pieces btw... I mean... Bring in a set piece coach if you need to. It's just weird how careless we are there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So the only options are: 1. Run the club tight as fuck like Mike Ashley. 2. Run the club irresponsible as fuck like Freddy Shepherd. Righto. Internet Dave, only ever two options. Yes/no Black/White Right/Wrong Never any middle ground, you should know that by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I'll have a go then. Moving to 4-4-2 at the begining of this season... Attempt to accommodate two proven, potent attacking threats We did that at the end of the previous season when we went 4-3-3 and played hte best football we have under Pardew. He didn't need to try and re-invent the wheel with such disastrous effect. By reverting to 4-4-2 we’ve turned a player who was on close to a goal a game in to one who relies on his arse for goals and we’ve lost 50% of our proven goal scorers. Bypassing midfield... Unfortunate result of not playing very well in the process The result of not playing well or the reason we're not playing well? Cisse is better on the wing than through the middle... Better on the wing if he's struggling for form while Ba is banging them in, arguably. Cisse was banging them in before we changed the way that we play, we moved Cisse for Ba and the result is that we have a player who isn't scoring and have lost the other one. I have no doubt that if Ba had played on the left he'd still be here because Chelsea whouldn't have been interested in him. Shola up front is a good idea... Hmmm yeah Cabaye is a better footballer when the ball is launched over his head... See 'bypassing the midfield' See bypassing the midfield Jonas is going to perform during a match when everybody can see that he's not doing it... He did it before. Understandable you'd stick with him through a bad patch? I'm not sure how you define a bad patch, he's been poor for most of the season. Williamson is good enough to play half the season in central defence... He was good enough to do it last year He wasn't good enough last year and that's why we needed a replacement in the summer. Spending 4 out of 5 days a week on defence is improving performances....not sure where you get that so won't comment Carver said that Pardew workked on the defence for 4 days and he worked on the attack for the other day. We should restrict a Championship team for 70 minutes before trying to get something from the game... Think the idea was not to injure or ban any more first teamers. Many on here clearly agreed that was the priority It's not the first time he's come out with that shit, doing it against a Championship team is worse then when he does it in the Premiership, which is bad enough. Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complaining that we have no continuity Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complain that our players are tired... The real pisser with midweek games is lack of preparation time and being deprived of the ability to focus as a group on the upcoming league match. Rotating your side does little to assuage that I'm playing Devil's advocate to a certain extent, motivated by what I see as hysterical, blinkered pessimism in some quarters. I think if your opinion is that Pardew (or pretty much any professional manager with very rare exceptions) is an absolutely hopeless numbskull incapable of basic footballing observations, the likelihood is that you're completely wrong and that there is a little more to the situation than you think. Of course you're playing devils advocate Are you Pardew or the clubs spin doctor? Just to make my position clear, I think Pardew is clueless, what that makes me to you doesn't make the slightest difference. The fact that you appear to be either sucked in by the shite the manager spouts or you're happy with the current performance of the club is mind boggling. Football is a competitive sport and this season we've gone massively backwards. I can't work out the thought process which would lead anybody to be satisfied. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tollemache Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So the only options are: 1. Run the club tight as f*** like Mike Ashley. 2. Run the club irresponsible as f*** like Freddy Shepherd. Righto. No. It comes down to whether you think Ashley is being tight as fuck, or merely sensible. "Tight as fuck" shouldn't come into it anyway; the club makes enough money to compete and if Ashley is running it responsibly within that budget, we will do ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Totally agree about set pieces btw... I mean... Bring in a set piece coach if you need to. It's just weird how careless we are there I find it baffling that a manager who has been in the game as player and boss for so long, is so inept at sorting them out. Completely baffled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tollemache Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I'll have a go then. Moving to 4-4-2 at the begining of this season... Attempt to accommodate two proven, potent attacking threats We did that at the end of the previous season when we went 4-3-3 and played hte best football we have under Pardew. He didn't need to try and re-invent the wheel with such disastrous effect. By reverting to 4-4-2 we’ve turned a player who was on close to a goal a game in to one who relies on his arse for goals and we’ve lost 50% of our proven goal scorers. Bypassing midfield... Unfortunate result of not playing very well in the process The result of not playing well or the reason we're not playing well? Cisse is better on the wing than through the middle... Better on the wing if he's struggling for form while Ba is banging them in, arguably. Cisse was banging them in before we changed the way that we play, we moved Cisse for Ba and the result is that we have a player who isn't scoring and have lost the other one. I have no doubt that if Ba had played on the left he'd still be here because Chelsea whouldn't have been interested in him. Shola up front is a good idea... Hmmm yeah Cabaye is a better footballer when the ball is launched over his head... See 'bypassing the midfield' See bypassing the midfield Jonas is going to perform during a match when everybody can see that he's not doing it... He did it before. Understandable you'd stick with him through a bad patch? I'm not sure how you define a bad patch, he's been poor for most of the season. Williamson is good enough to play half the season in central defence... He was good enough to do it last year He wasn't good enough last year and that's why we needed a replacement in the summer. Spending 4 out of 5 days a week on defence is improving performances....not sure where you get that so won't comment Carver said that Pardew workked on the defence for 4 days and he worked on the attack for the other day. We should restrict a Championship team for 70 minutes before trying to get something from the game... Think the idea was not to injure or ban any more first teamers. Many on here clearly agreed that was the priority It's not the first time he's come out with that s***, doing it against a Championship team is worse then when he does it in the Premiership, which is bad enough. Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complaining that we have no continuity Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complain that our players are tired... The real pisser with midweek games is lack of preparation time and being deprived of the ability to focus as a group on the upcoming league match. Rotating your side does little to assuage that I'm playing Devil's advocate to a certain extent, motivated by what I see as hysterical, blinkered pessimism in some quarters. I think if your opinion is that Pardew (or pretty much any professional manager with very rare exceptions) is an absolutely hopeless numbskull incapable of basic footballing observations, the likelihood is that you're completely wrong and that there is a little more to the situation than you think. Of course you're playing devils advocate Are you Pardew or the clubs spin doctor? Just to make my position clear, I think Pardew is clueless, what that makes me to you doesn't make the slightest difference. The fact that you appear to be either sucked in by the s**** the manager spouts or you're happy with the current performance of the club is mind boggling. Football is a competitive sport and this season we've gone massively backwards. I can't work out the thought process which would lead anybody to be satisfied. It's easy, I just think about periods of time of longer than half a season. Longer than one season even! Imagine! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I'll have a go then. Moving to 4-4-2 at the begining of this season... Attempt to accommodate two proven, potent attacking threats We did that at the end of the previous season when we went 4-3-3 and played hte best football we have under Pardew. He didn't need to try and re-invent the wheel with such disastrous effect. By reverting to 4-4-2 we’ve turned a player who was on close to a goal a game in to one who relies on his arse for goals and we’ve lost 50% of our proven goal scorers. Bypassing midfield... Unfortunate result of not playing very well in the process The result of not playing well or the reason we're not playing well? Cisse is better on the wing than through the middle... Better on the wing if he's struggling for form while Ba is banging them in, arguably. Cisse was banging them in before we changed the way that we play, we moved Cisse for Ba and the result is that we have a player who isn't scoring and have lost the other one. I have no doubt that if Ba had played on the left he'd still be here because Chelsea whouldn't have been interested in him. Shola up front is a good idea... Hmmm yeah Cabaye is a better footballer when the ball is launched over his head... See 'bypassing the midfield' See bypassing the midfield Jonas is going to perform during a match when everybody can see that he's not doing it... He did it before. Understandable you'd stick with him through a bad patch? I'm not sure how you define a bad patch, he's been poor for most of the season. Williamson is good enough to play half the season in central defence... He was good enough to do it last year He wasn't good enough last year and that's why we needed a replacement in the summer. Spending 4 out of 5 days a week on defence is improving performances....not sure where you get that so won't comment Carver said that Pardew workked on the defence for 4 days and he worked on the attack for the other day. We should restrict a Championship team for 70 minutes before trying to get something from the game... Think the idea was not to injure or ban any more first teamers. Many on here clearly agreed that was the priority It's not the first time he's come out with that shit, doing it against a Championship team is worse then when he does it in the Premiership, which is bad enough. Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complaining that we have no continuity Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complain that our players are tired... The real pisser with midweek games is lack of preparation time and being deprived of the ability to focus as a group on the upcoming league match. Rotating your side does little to assuage that I'm playing Devil's advocate to a certain extent, motivated by what I see as hysterical, blinkered pessimism in some quarters. I think if your opinion is that Pardew (or pretty much any professional manager with very rare exceptions) is an absolutely hopeless numbskull incapable of basic footballing observations, the likelihood is that you're completely wrong and that there is a little more to the situation than you think. Of course you're playing devils advocate Are you Pardew or the clubs spin doctor? Just to make my position clear, I think Pardew is clueless, what that makes me to you doesn't make the slightest difference. The fact that you appear to be either sucked in by the shite the manager spouts or you're happy with the current performance of the club is mind boggling. Football is a competitive sport and this season we've gone massively backwards. I can't work out the thought process which would lead anybody to be satisfied. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Flash Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So I suppose I'd tend to back Ian W to an extent. Perhaps go a little further and speculate, to the possible agreement of Interpolic, that it is possible that all of this stems from something as trivial as a debate over whether or not to accommodate Demba Ba. I think a couple of injuries and a nagging issue or two like that really can be enough to tip a team over the edge. And when those couple of injuries include the two key creative reference points in your side... Problems. As you'll possibly have noticed by now, I'm a lot more pro-Ashley and pro-Pardew than most because I see signs of what I think is exactly the right way to run a football club emerging after years of embarrassing Shepherd madness, and I'm loath to write that prospect off until the grim death because it is exactly what the club has been crying out for for a long, long time. I'll forgive a run of shitty form, a dud transfer window, a bit of hoofball, a baffling decision and even a slightly uninspirational manager quite happily if it means we end up a soundly-run, upwardly mobile outfit in a few years and I can see it happening. Look at the calibre of our best XI for Christ's sake. If we somehow get it wrong and go down I'll be heartbroken because it will most likely be ripped apart but I think if you can't see that this administration is our best chance for ages at being a proper club you need your head checking. Whatever they're doing wrong, they're doing a lot right. I'm waffling and my pint is getting warm so cheers Yeah me too. But we have an owner that just don´t care about the success, and a manager that just isn´t good enough to take us to the top. That makes it all even more frustrating because I agree that in many ways we do have a good structure. We would just need a owner that would care a little bit more, and a manager that is a little bit better. Who put the structure in place? The owner. Why? Because he wants his club to do well as a business. What is the best way, and arguably the only way, to bring that about? If the club is successful. Regardless of whether or not Ashley gives a flying f*** about the football (and reputedly he does), he's not only heavily incentivised to make us a successful club, he's taken all of the steps towards that that you say you appreciate. In this case, saying that the structure is great apart from the owner makes no sense. Ashley etc need to learn how to strike a balance between business sense and football sense. It's pointless having a well run business financially if it can't compete in the marketplace. It'd be a massive step forward for us if they could do that. We just bought France's first choice right back? In what sense are we not competing in the marketplace? If you mean we're not splashing the same cash as clubs in stronger positions than us, not paying whatever it takes to get our targets, then you do not want the best for the club and you should consider lobbying for the return of effing Freddie Shepherd We've just lost our top scorer? The point is we're only "splashing" the cash other teams give us and, as that's dried up considerably since the Carroll money has been spent, our incoming transfers have been minimal. Business sense + football sense pls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 So the only options are: 1. Run the club tight as fuck like Mike Ashley. 2. Run the club irresponsible as fuck like Freddy Shepherd. Righto. Piffling over 500,000-1 million over Mariappa and Debuchy in the last couple of windows for instance, could've arguably cost us valuable squad strength. I think everone understands the merits of a more austere model than those before but let's not pretend he's regularly keeping the squad in the ost healthy of positions as best he can. He's a businessman (of acumen) who has seen value in owning a football club financially and being as frugal as he can. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tollemache Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Your idea of football sense seems to be "spending more money" then. And we wouldn't have had that top scorer had it not been for the clause under which he left, so to interpret that in terms of lack of ambition is daft. Clearly we'd have kept him if it had been possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I don´t even think we have used all of the "Carroll-money". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Flash Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Your idea of football sense seems to be "spending more money" then. And we wouldn't have had that top scorer had it not been for the clause under which he left, so to interpret that in terms of lack of ambition is daft. Clearly we'd have kept him if it had been possible. "Spend money when it will greatly benefit us" yes. Like last Summer when we could have pushed on and aimed higher with some ambition and a modest outlay. But we're 15th and in a relegation fight now but the balance sheet looks healthy so who cares? I realise we're going in circles here so if you can't see the middle ground that Dave is pointing out then you're on the payroll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest malandro Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I'll have a go then. Moving to 4-4-2 at the begining of this season... Attempt to accommodate two proven, potent attacking threats We did that at the end of the previous season when we went 4-3-3 and played hte best football we have under Pardew. He didn't need to try and re-invent the wheel with such disastrous effect. By reverting to 4-4-2 we’ve turned a player who was on close to a goal a game in to one who relies on his arse for goals and we’ve lost 50% of our proven goal scorers. Bypassing midfield... Unfortunate result of not playing very well in the process The result of not playing well or the reason we're not playing well? Cisse is better on the wing than through the middle... Better on the wing if he's struggling for form while Ba is banging them in, arguably. Cisse was banging them in before we changed the way that we play, we moved Cisse for Ba and the result is that we have a player who isn't scoring and have lost the other one. I have no doubt that if Ba had played on the left he'd still be here because Chelsea whouldn't have been interested in him. Shola up front is a good idea... Hmmm yeah Cabaye is a better footballer when the ball is launched over his head... See 'bypassing the midfield' See bypassing the midfield Jonas is going to perform during a match when everybody can see that he's not doing it... He did it before. Understandable you'd stick with him through a bad patch? I'm not sure how you define a bad patch, he's been poor for most of the season. Williamson is good enough to play half the season in central defence... He was good enough to do it last year He wasn't good enough last year and that's why we needed a replacement in the summer. Spending 4 out of 5 days a week on defence is improving performances....not sure where you get that so won't comment Carver said that Pardew workked on the defence for 4 days and he worked on the attack for the other day. We should restrict a Championship team for 70 minutes before trying to get something from the game... Think the idea was not to injure or ban any more first teamers. Many on here clearly agreed that was the priority It's not the first time he's come out with that s***, doing it against a Championship team is worse then when he does it in the Premiership, which is bad enough. Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complaining that we have no continuity Virtually playing 2 teams a week then complain that our players are tired... The real pisser with midweek games is lack of preparation time and being deprived of the ability to focus as a group on the upcoming league match. Rotating your side does little to assuage that I'm playing Devil's advocate to a certain extent, motivated by what I see as hysterical, blinkered pessimism in some quarters. I think if your opinion is that Pardew (or pretty much any professional manager with very rare exceptions) is an absolutely hopeless numbskull incapable of basic footballing observations, the likelihood is that you're completely wrong and that there is a little more to the situation than you think. Of course you're playing devils advocate Are you Pardew or the clubs spin doctor? Just to make my position clear, I think Pardew is clueless, what that makes me to you doesn't make the slightest difference. The fact that you appear to be either sucked in by the s**** the manager spouts or you're happy with the current performance of the club is mind boggling. Football is a competitive sport and this season we've gone massively backwards. I can't work out the thought process which would lead anybody to be satisfied. It's easy, I just think about periods of time of longer than half a season. Longer than one season even! Imagine! What like five seasons? How far have we moved on since MA took over. Lower in the league - yes. Significantly more debt - yes Doing better in the cups - no Attendances up - no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 Your idea of football sense seems to be "spending more money" then. And we wouldn't have had that top scorer had it not been for the clause under which he left, so to interpret that in terms of lack of ambition is daft. Clearly we'd have kept him if it had been possible. Yes; but only to an extent and when appropriate. I find it hard to believe that the majority of the Caroll money has been spent to the degree that's its had a truly effective impact. I don't see how you can set your sights at top ten, finish comfortably in the top 6 and not see that as a platform to invest. Not by daft amounts and stupid contracts a la Shepherd but just by showing a more assertive stance on transfer activity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts