Flip Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 I'm clueless for thinking MYM will be good in the future? OK. You're clueless full stop. That was just another in your latest line of moronic posts. He's as much in the Carvalho mould as you are. you know someone can be described as being in the Carvalho (or whatever great player you care to think of) mode without actually being as good just a similar type of player in playing style He's nothing like Carvalho. Carvalho had a great footballing brain whereas Mbwia certainly does not. Carvalho never got sent off for anything stupid either right? Pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Apparently the word 'future' doesn't appear in the cirriculum in Wallsend. I am shocked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Apparently the word 'future' doesn't appear in the cirriculum in Wallsend. I am shocked. Stop wriggling man. I've shown you up as the clueless idiot you are once more. Accept it and move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKSC Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Ronaldo can be called many things. Most of them derogatory. But he's not clueless. He's a good knowledgeable poster. That's probably why he gets called so many derogatory names. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Bailey Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Ronaldo can be called many things. Most of them derogatory. But he's not clueless. He's a good knowledgeable poster. That's probably why he gets called so many derogatory names. Plus jealousy of his devilish good looks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKSC Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Ronaldo can be called many things. Most of them derogatory. But he's not clueless. He's a good knowledgeable poster. That's probably why he gets called so many derogatory names. Plus jealousy of his devilish good looks That too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Apparently the word 'future' doesn't appear in the cirriculum in Wallsend. I am shocked. Stop wriggling man. I've shown you up as the clueless idiot you are once more. Accept it and move on. STEP DOWN SON, RONALDO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Ronaldo can be called many things. Most of them derogatory. But he's not clueless. He's a good knowledgeable poster. That's probably why he gets called so many derogatory names. Plus jealousy of his devilish good looks That too. :thup: The funny thing is all I've ever really said about MYM is that he's not ready to start for us at CB but he'll probably be very good with a couple of seasons behind him. How today's incident conflicts with that I don't know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Bailey Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Ronaldo can be called many things. Most of them derogatory. But he's not clueless. He's a good knowledgeable poster. That's probably why he gets called so many derogatory names. Plus jealousy of his devilish good looks That too. :thup: The funny thing is all I've ever really said about MYM is that he's not ready to start for us at CB but he'll probably be very good with a couple of seasons behind him. How today's incident conflicts with that I don't know. it doesn't. he is a very good prospect and with games and exposure he will get better...imo (Bit like Haidara imo.) big question is where do they get games? with us sporadically or on loan...sadly our depleted squad depth has a major bearing.Again imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Was very naive of him to pull at Suarez who was always going to make the most out of it. Tiote though, what was he doing coming back from so far back, subsequently playing Suarez onside. If he had some positional sense, MYM would not have got caught out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Tiote was on the floor or something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Sam Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 One thing he had to avoid was getting sent off. He was doing alright as well. Shame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Was very naive of him to pull at Suarez who was always going to make the most out of it. Tiote though, what was he doing coming back from so far back, subsequently playing Suarez onside. If he had some positional sense, MYM would not have got caught out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 I think we would have won if he didn't get sent off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Was very naive of him to pull at Suarez who was always going to make the most out of it. Tiote though, what was he doing coming back from so far back, subsequently playing Suarez onside. If he had some positional sense, MYM would not have got caught out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 I'm not too worried about him at the minute. The mistakes he's making are generally through inexperience rather than lack of ability. He's a bit naive. Was badly let down by Tiote for the goal as well, daft as his ultimate challenge was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Spot-on Andy Perfect opportunity for AP and the staff to teach Mapou from here. He was playing really great leading up to it. The type of thing that can BUILD young person is to give him confidence in the strong things he did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Hope you're right. Pardew talked him up before the game so will be interesting to say if he says anything about the incident. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Having seen the incident it's kinda dumb but really the rules need to be changed because a red for that is beyond ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 It's the triple punishment that's the thing for me. Red card, certain goal, and a ban. Maybe they need to come up with categories of red card, some of which don't carry a ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 It's the triple punishment that's the thing for me. Red card, certain goal, and a ban. Maybe they need to come up with categories of red card, some of which don't carry a ban. I'm with this post. I also just hate the soft overdramatic contacts that become more than they should. Call me old school at heart. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 It's the triple punishment that's the thing for me. Red card, certain goal, and a ban. Maybe they need to come up with categories of red card, some of which don't carry a ban. I'm with this post. I also just hate the soft overdramatic contacts that become more than they should. Call me old school at heart. I know what you mean, it's not really a foul that's worthy of a red. The problem is that you have to have a punishment that stops people just bringing down every forward who's through on goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 It's the triple punishment that's the thing for me. Red card, certain goal, and a ban. Maybe they need to come up with categories of red card, some of which don't carry a ban. Nah I don't think so. All they need to do is remove the instant red card for those kind of offences and judge it based on each situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 It's the triple punishment that's the thing for me. Red card, certain goal, and a ban. Maybe they need to come up with categories of red card, some of which don't carry a ban. I'm with this post. I also just hate the soft overdramatic contacts that become more than they should. Call me old school at heart. I know what you mean, it's not really a foul that's worthy of a red. The problem is that you have to have a punishment that stops people just bringing down every forward who's through on goal. Yeah, and I won't even pretend say I know what a better way or better solution would be. If we want to talk letter of the law with Mapou's red, then Gerrard's professional foul on Remy should have seen yellow with letter of law and he should have went off, right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Gerrard was quite lucky to get away with that I thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now