Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 21/01/2015 at 21:26, Mole_Toonfan said:

  Quote

 

Not exactly crap is it? All they are saying is we'd have to pay them off to get the right man which is most likely true.

 

Not that we will.

 

Crap as in no decision until the hull game and we it'd be a 2 million compensation bill to bin the clowns currently in charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 20:23, r0cafella said:

 

WTF?!!  "All three have looked after the team...and have worked with the players on the trainig field since pardew made the switch...."

 

There's a fucking revolutionary idea... trainers on the training pitch! What next? Start training with footballs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine its reduced pay off. Ain't no fucking way this skint fucking owner would allow for a contract for full fees of termination, there would be some reduced liquidated damages cost of a year or 2 IMO.

 

Chron just see, oh, contract is for X years - gotta pay them all that, lykkk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good god why have we done fuck all still... This fucking clubs management fuck.

 

Right now the one underlying priority and need is getting someone in that isn't Carver.

 

Preferably a permanent candidate comes in now, but failing that I am happy for an interim til seasons end and get a new boss in May. Anything but keep charver from letting us nosedived into the relegation zone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 22/01/2015 at 09:43, Varadi said:

Talkshite have picked up on the Schuster story - in talks today they reckon:

 

http://talksport.com/football/exclusive-former-real-madrid-boss-schuster-set-newcastle-manager-talks-150122133359?

 

The last line sums Talksport up perfectly - "The attacking midfielder is currently out of work, after leaving Malaga in May 2014"

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 22/01/2015 at 09:54, KaKa said:

I think ultimately the club would prefer someone that is willing to have the three stooges as part of their staff. It's clear they hate handing out money.

 

 

 

I called this about 10 pages ago. It's such an obvious Ashley move and I reckon that's what could have scuppered any potential deal for Garde.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 22/01/2015 at 09:50, AlanSkärare said:

Chronicle's piece about massive payoffs - can't help but think it's a deliberate ploy from the club to scare supporters into acceptance of staying with Carver.

 

Who'd be needing a massive payoff? Galtier or McLaren?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 22/01/2015 at 10:06, Disco said:

  Quote

Chronicle's piece about massive payoffs - can't help but think it's a deliberate ploy from the club to scare supporters into acceptance of staying with Carver.

 

Who'd be needing a massive payoff? Galtier or McLaren?

 

Carver, Woodman and Stone - all contracted until 2020.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 22/01/2015 at 09:52, Ankles Bennett said:

He got sacked by Malaga cos they failed to finish in the top half of la liga.  Sounds just the man for us.........

 

Doesn't tend to stay at clubs for more than a couple of seasons. Hardly one for the long term either. The saga continues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 22/01/2015 at 10:08, steve_69 said:

  Quote

  Quote

Chronicle's piece about massive payoffs - can't help but think it's a deliberate ploy from the club to scare supporters into acceptance of staying with Carver.

 

Who'd be needing a massive payoff? Galtier or McLaren?

 

Carver, Woodman and Stone - all contracted until 2020.

 

Just frame them & then sack them for misconduct. Nee bother.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 22/01/2015 at 10:01, steve_69 said:

  Quote

I think ultimately the club would prefer someone that is willing to have the three stooges as part of their staff. It's clear they hate handing out money.

 

 

 

I called this about 10 pages ago. It's such an obvious Ashley move and I reckon that's what could have scuppered any potential deal for Garde.

 

 

 

Despite Charver's warnings that if he didn't get the job full time here, he could quit to look for a full time job elsewhere, the flaw in that logic was the idea that anybody else would give him a job as manager. Based on what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...