Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Personally I would have harry, but he would want money to spend and that won't happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Have zero expectations but they will somehow destroy those with the cheapest and most ridiculous appointment possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Personally I would have harry, but he would want money to spend and that won't happen. Seriously?? Personally don't want another slack jawed no-mark charlatan to take over and pretend he knows what he's doing. Rather have Carver than Harry fucking Redknapp. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I know he's a slack jawed yokel and QPR aren't the best example of his management but they are a limited squad. I think he would get the best out of this squad and he surely makes the cut above someone like mac laren or harry Bassett. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Clubs looking for a long term project with a man who wont want any say in transfers and you talk about fucking 67 year old wheeler dealer Redknapp Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Harry doesn't like being called a wheeler dealer pal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Hitler probably didn't like being called evil either tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Think I would rather have Carver than Harry. Absolutely detest the bloke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Carver? now I know your having a laugh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I don't want Carver, but Harry is a living nightmare. Anyway, we won't pay him and he won't work this far north. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 No control over transfers, rarely any signings, selling our best players as soon as someone bids, about as far away from London as possible. Harry would top himself...actually let's appoint him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Ashley is known to surprise Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Appointing Redknapp would be even more farcical than appointing Pardew ffs It would end in disaster though, rather than just plain impotence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I would like to see garde but if not then harry. To say harry would be a disaster is a bit ott. The man has pedigree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Harry's had his time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I would like to see garde but if not then harry. To say harry would be a disaster is a bit ott. The man has pedigree Pedigree? Really? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Seems a popular time for wums on here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I would like to see garde but if not then harry. To say harry would be a disaster is a bit ott. The man has pedigree Pedigree? Really? Aye, chum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I'd pedigree him onto a sledgehammer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 A difference in opinion doesn't make somebody a wum. I genuinely believe he still has a lot to offer football Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I would like to see garde but if not then harry. To say harry would be a disaster is a bit ott. The man has pedigree Pedigree? Really? Aye, chum. Doesn't exactly winalot does he, pal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 A difference in opinion doesn't make somebody a wum. I genuinely believe he still has a lot to offer football You're fully entitled to your opinion of course, I just struggle to see how that opinion can be formed around a guy who has left every club he has managed (bar Levy-backed spurs) in deep shit, and has achieved close to nothing special in football. He's also getting on a bit now, and is nothing like what we desperately need at NUFC. We need someone with dignity and honesty and a bit of ability to start with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Carvery Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I would prefer garde definitely but looking at the shit in football at the moment harry is one of the better options. Can't see us getting De boer, mac laren is not up to the task and tuchel couldn't manage a bowl of soup. Who else is available who would come? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenige Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I would prefer garde definitely but looking at the s*** in football at the moment harry is one of the better options. Can't see us getting De boer, mac laren is not up to the task and tuchel couldn't manage a bowl of soup. Who else is available who would come? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I would prefer garde definitely but looking at the s*** in football at the moment harry is one of the better options. Can't see us getting De boer, mac laren is not up to the task and tuchel couldn't manage a bowl of soup. Who else is available who would come? This post. Don't know where to begin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now