Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And to be clear, I don't think the club should be pursuing a policy of only buying players from X country, Britain or otherwise.

 

Though I feel there's better value to be had on the continent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And to be clear, I don't think the club should be pursuing a policy of only buying players from X country, Britain or otherwise.

 

Though I feel there's better value to be had on the continent.

 

Right, how about we just buy the best players available to us. Radical concept i know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Laudrup came in for 2 years, finished 8th-9th, got us playing good football, took the cups seriously and buggered off bored at the end of it, I'd take that compared to what's about to come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want Laudrup at all.

 

I feel the same. Disaster written all over it that one.

 

It would be Keegan (his second stint) all over again. Laudrup wouldn't last 2 months in the clubs current setup. He want complete control over transfers etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want Laudrup at all.

 

I feel the same. Disaster written all over it that one.

 

It would be Keegan (his second stint) all over again. Laudrup wouldn't last 2 months in the clubs current setup. He want complete control over transfers etc.

 

Well you'd imagine that would be discussed before he signed to be fair. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I worry about Laudrup, too many people saying bad things about him and his style of management. He got sacked by the might of Swansea City for goodness sake. They did play some good stuff under him and won a trophy, something we've not done in close to half a century but they didn't seem to be upset when he was gone and haven't done that bad since.

 

i don't know why Keegan thinks he's the best fit for us and the structure we have in place. Mind you if we are choosing between him, Mclaren and Carver then he's an easy choice. Just hope these aren't the sum of our short list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want Laudrup at all.

 

I feel the same. Disaster written all over it that one.

 

It would be Keegan (his second stint) all over again. Laudrup wouldn't last 2 months in the clubs current setup. He want complete control over transfers etc.

 

I also think he has an agent who want to be involved in transfers - one of the reasons I think, he fell out with the board at Swansea.  Whatever happened there, they were glad to be rid of him in the end which would concern me.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Gino14

Laudrup would bring good football, but there's definitely something not quite right with the way things ended at Swansea.  He'd probably never take the job here because he'd have requirements we'd never agree to meet. I'd take him in a heartbeat if it meant Carver was gone though. People can pick at what might be wrong with Laudrup, but we've just had Carver, so I could put up with him quite easily I think.  That doesn't mean I think we should appoint him, but there's a lot of worse appointments we could make.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Laudrup would bring good football, but there's definitely something not quite right with the way things ended at Swansea.  He'd probably never take the job here because he'd have requirements we'd never agree to meet. I'd take him in a heartbeat if it meant Carver was gone though. People can pick at what might be wrong with Laudrup, but we've just had Carver, so I could put up with him quite easily I think.  That doesn't mean I think we should appoint him, but there's a lot of worse appointments we could make.

 

:thup:

 

Pretty much my views on it. I'd much rather have him here over Carver/McLaren but Garde would still be my first choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Laudrup would bring good football, but there's definitely something not quite right with the way things ended at Swansea.  He'd probably never take the job here because he'd have requirements we'd never agree to meet. I'd take him in a heartbeat if it meant Carver was gone though. People can pick at what might be wrong with Laudrup, but we've just had Carver, so I could put up with him quite easily I think.  That doesn't mean I think we should appoint him, but there's a lot of worse appointments we could make.

 

He played some decent, on-the-deck possession football with Swansea but his managerial record is rather uninspiring and I feel like he's an even bigger cunt than Pardew was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...