Pilko Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 He does start to look slightly plugged after 70-75 minutes, but Gutierrez always gets a bit leggy by that point, as did Ba and Nolan yet they were never subbed very often at all by Pardew. I think it's more to do with the fact he won't kick up so much of a fuss as opposed to some kind of tactical nous or whatever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Seems to be left out of a fair few 'first choice 11's' when discussed on here but I would definitely have him in there tbh. We need another wide player but I'm far from convinced we will get a full season out of HBA and if we play 2 up top I have no concerns about Gouffran being good enough. The lad has a great deal about him and I reckon he will be a key player for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Coming round to the idea of him and Cisse up top more and more. Think he could be what Bellamy used to be for us in some ways, speed and movement causing defences problems and chipping in with goals too. Underrated player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Seems to be left out of a fair few 'first choice 11's' when discussed on here but I would definitely have him in there tbh. We need another wide player but I'm far from convinced we will get a full season out of HBA and if we play 2 up top I have no concerns about Gouffran being good enough. The lad has a great deal about him and I reckon he will be a key player for us. these discussions going on all over the board and they're totally pointless, apart from jonas, willo & shola i honestly just about all of our senior squad are "good enough" in principle but they'lll never be deployed correctly under pardew 'cause he hasn't got a fucking clue cisse is a double-figures striker and there's no reason whatsoever gouffran couldn't be with his pace and movement problem is the midfield contribute absolutely fucking nothing in goals, very little in the way of service, and fuck all in movement to help the strikers out so yeah in principle gouffran could be quality, but we'll soon get a reality check when him and cisse are alone running at a back four surrounded by the opposition defence while the other 9 outfield players stand and watch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Seems to be left out of a fair few 'first choice 11's' when discussed on here but I would definitely have him in there tbh. We need another wide player but I'm far from convinced we will get a full season out of HBA and if we play 2 up top I have no concerns about Gouffran being good enough. The lad has a great deal about him and I reckon he will be a key player for us. Reason being is because i'm pretty convinced we will sign a high profile forward this summer to replace the goals of Ba. I like him a lot but he's always going to be dropped before Ben Arfa and Cisse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Unfortunately Ben Arfa will probably barely play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Coming round to the idea of him and Cisse up top more and more. Think he could be what Bellamy used to be for us in some ways, speed and movement causing defences problems and chipping in with goals too. Underrated player. Hard to tell at this point. Bellamy had a hell of a left foot on him, I haven't seen what Gouffran offers in that regard. Yes he's a clever player with a turn of speed but until I see him finish a couple of goals decisively I'm unsure what has in his locker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Unfortunately Ben Arfa will probably barely play. Well those first eleven teams you see are exactly that, there is zero considering of injuries when doing them as they are what people want to see when everyone is fit and available. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Unfortunately Ben Arfa will probably barely play. Well those first eleven teams you see are exactly that, there is zero considering of injuries when doing them as they are what people want to see when everyone is fit and available. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Coming round to the idea of him and Cisse up top more and more. Think he could be what Bellamy used to be for us in some ways, speed and movement causing defences problems and chipping in with goals too. Underrated player. Bellamy mostly caused problems because he'd beat players with pace and skill and he'd create. Gouffran as much as I wanted him to be of that ilk just isn't. He's a tidy, tenacious and quick decent finisher. He's not the answer to getting the best out of Cisse and never will be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Coming round to the idea of him and Cisse up top more and more. Think he could be what Bellamy used to be for us in some ways, speed and movement causing defences problems and chipping in with goals too. Underrated player. Bellamy mostly caused problems because he'd beat players with pace and skill and he'd create. Gouffran as much as I wanted him to be of that ilk just isn't. He's a tidy, tenacious and quick decent finisher. He's not the answer to getting the best out of Cisse and never will be. I don't think he's like Bellamy on the ball but I do think they share similar traits off the ball and that could be really effective if we utilise it. As for linking with Cisse, I think he showed against Arsenal that against certain opposition he can be good foil, he runs the channels well and can create opportunities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 From what I've seen I much prefer him as a central player rather than wide. If we do buy, he'll a very decent sub/fill in player to have though which for us is most unusual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 From what I've seen I much prefer him as a central player rather than wide. Yeah, he's competent out wide and could be good there if we played a creative player at the tip of the midfield diamond but his brief appearances up top show where he will be most effective. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 There weren't any opportunities, though. You can't have two players up front with little to no creativity, especially in a team severely lacking creativity in the midfield. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 I'd have Gouffran where Sissoko has been playing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 There weren't any opportunities, though. You can't have two players up front with little to no creativity, especially in a team severely lacking creativity in the midfield. Depends on the type of creativity you're looking for. One of our best chances last week was when Gouffran got ahead of Mertesacker and put in a first-time cross across the goalmouth, Cisse was inches away from it. That's creative, not in the traditional sense but I think that could work for us. Admittedly, I wouldn't go for it unless we got a significant upgrade on the left wing in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 I'd have Gouffran where Sissoko has been playing. He's even less of a no.10 than Sissoko, to be fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexthegreat Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 I really don't rate him but appreciate he works hard. Think the most he can aspire to is to be the next Kevin Gallacher or Peter Lovenkrands. 7 goals in our last 10 league games is woeful and if we are still picking a strikeforce from Gouffran, Cisse, Shola, and Campbell then we will continue to struggle. He might be useful to have on the bench but isn't good enough to start for us imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 I'd have Gouffran where Sissoko has been playing. He's even less of a no.10 than Sissoko, to be fair. Still say if we are to persist with 4-2-3-1 then we need a proper 10, the only one we have is Marveaux and he's a walking doctors note. The rest is too much square pegs in round holes for my liking tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 He's far better than those two, like. Lovenkrands was abhorrent footballer in the PL. The lack of goal threat is digsuting, though. And although he got the goal that probably kept us up he's hardly a remedy. Criminal that we lost our main goal threat in January and tried to replace him with cheap players while no track record of consistently hitting the back of the net. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginola Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 He's far better than those two, like. Lovenkrands was abhorrent footballer in the PL. The lack of goal threat is digsuting, though. And although he got the goal that probably kept us up he's hardly a remedy. Criminal that we lost our main goal threat in January and tried to replace him with cheap players while no track record of consistently hitting the back of the net. One of our main issues throughout the season was that we only really had 1 goalscorer in the squad after Ba left Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 I'd have Gouffran where Sissoko has been playing. He's even less of a no.10 than Sissoko, to be fair. Still say if we are to persist with 4-2-3-1 then we need a proper 10, the only one we have is Marveaux and he's a walking doctors note. The rest is too much square pegs in round holes for my liking tbh. We've got the players for a decent 4-3-3 if Tiote can keep it simple. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 We haven't at all. Unless you're happy with no creativity, no goals and huge suceptibility to teams willing and able to press high up the park. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 We'll have to agree to disagree then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Creativity isn't too much of an issue with our first XI, we only really need a good left midfielder to come in and there's good quality in there. Our squad options are very poor though, outside of Ben Arfa and Cabaye there's only Marveaux, and that needs addressing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now