thomas Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 note to lurking papa johns marketing weasels : I am not located in the northeast of england, this doesn't help me at all. PM me a coupon code you know I deserve. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Just set yourself as a Man City fan instead, you'll save loads of dough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 anchovies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Reckon olive to see the day when this is a pun free zone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Reckon olive to see the day when this is a pun free zone? somehow I just don't see that deep panning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 http://i.minus.com/ioTf0HZIJb63D.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 http://animatedpizzagifs.com/images/pizza-the-hut.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 I muckle want pizza now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 If you take away the puns then what do we have? terrible aids. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-articles/message-manchester-city-fans-newcastle-supporters-suffered-enough-yet/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Andy Carroll: West Ham seek legal route over red card West Ham are to take legal action after failing in their appeal to overturn the red card shown to Andy Carroll during the 1 February win against Swansea. The Football Association upheld the decision which means the England striker is now banned for three games. "There is nowhere to go other than to seek some kind of legal redress," said West Ham co-chairman David Gold. Rules allow clubs to take disputes to arbitration and if necessary to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The FA has refused to comment on the latest development. Carroll, 25, was sent off after clashing with Swans defender Chico Flores during his side's 2-0 victory. He will now miss the Premier League games against Aston Villa, Norwich and Southampton. In apparent reaction to the decision, Carroll, who set up both goals tweeted: "Disgraceful." According to the FA, West Ham failed to prove to a three-man panel that referee Howard Webb had made "an obvious error" in dismissing Carroll after the forward's arm hit Flores's forehead. However, West Ham manager Sam Allardyce was certain that Webb made a mistake. "There has to be somebody to look at that in the cold light of day and say that is certainly not a red card," he said after the win. Gold added: "We are hugely disappointed at the outcome of the process. "The last thing I want to do is going to some kind of legal issue because I think it is a footballing issue. "But we are fighting for our lives. If we were mid-table we would probably get on with it but we are fighting for our lives to retain our Premier League status and we owe it to our fans, we owe it to ourselves. "We are upset, we feel we have been badly treated. "Most judgements are not made by three people, they are made by 12 - that's why they are called juries. "I believe if you had gone to the FA Council and asked the 100 members 75% would have said it was not a sending off, but if you just take three people it may not be representative." West Ham are 18th in the Premier League, one point from safety Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Club Statement: Kath the Tea Lady 07-02-2014 Newcastle United can confirm that Kath the Tea Lady has resigned from her position as Tea Lady with immediate effect. The Club will be making no further comment. www.nufc.co.uk/default.aspx?s=news-display&aid=3657477 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Andy Carroll: West Ham seek legal route over red card West Ham are to take legal action after failing in their appeal to overturn the red card shown to Andy Carroll during the 1 February win against Swansea. The Football Association upheld the decision which means the England striker is now banned for three games. "There is nowhere to go other than to seek some kind of legal redress," said West Ham co-chairman David Gold. Rules allow clubs to take disputes to arbitration and if necessary to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The FA has refused to comment on the latest development. Carroll, 25, was sent off after clashing with Swans defender Chico Flores during his side's 2-0 victory. He will now miss the Premier League games against Aston Villa, Norwich and Southampton. In apparent reaction to the decision, Carroll, who set up both goals tweeted: "Disgraceful." According to the FA, West Ham failed to prove to a three-man panel that referee Howard Webb had made "an obvious error" in dismissing Carroll after the forward's arm hit Flores's forehead. However, West Ham manager Sam Allardyce was certain that Webb made a mistake. "There has to be somebody to look at that in the cold light of day and say that is certainly not a red card," he said after the win. Gold added: "We are hugely disappointed at the outcome of the process. "The last thing I want to do is going to some kind of legal issue because I think it is a footballing issue. "But we are fighting for our lives. If we were mid-table we would probably get on with it but we are fighting for our lives to retain our Premier League status and we owe it to our fans, we owe it to ourselves. "We are upset, we feel we have been badly treated. "Most judgements are not made by three people, they are made by 12 - that's why they are called juries. "I believe if you had gone to the FA Council and asked the 100 members 75% would have said it was not a sending off, but if you just take three people it may not be representative." West Ham are 18th in the Premier League, one point from safety I look forward to FIFA banning West Ham from all football. Don't they have a thing about not involving the courts in footy stuff? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Andy Carroll: West Ham seek legal route over red card West Ham are to take legal action after failing in their appeal to overturn the red card shown to Andy Carroll during the 1 February win against Swansea. The Football Association upheld the decision which means the England striker is now banned for three games. "There is nowhere to go other than to seek some kind of legal redress," said West Ham co-chairman David Gold. Rules allow clubs to take disputes to arbitration and if necessary to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The FA has refused to comment on the latest development. Carroll, 25, was sent off after clashing with Swans defender Chico Flores during his side's 2-0 victory. He will now miss the Premier League games against Aston Villa, Norwich and Southampton. In apparent reaction to the decision, Carroll, who set up both goals tweeted: "Disgraceful." According to the FA, West Ham failed to prove to a three-man panel that referee Howard Webb had made "an obvious error" in dismissing Carroll after the forward's arm hit Flores's forehead. However, West Ham manager Sam Allardyce was certain that Webb made a mistake. "There has to be somebody to look at that in the cold light of day and say that is certainly not a red card," he said after the win. Gold added: "We are hugely disappointed at the outcome of the process. "The last thing I want to do is going to some kind of legal issue because I think it is a footballing issue. "But we are fighting for our lives. If we were mid-table we would probably get on with it but we are fighting for our lives to retain our Premier League status and we owe it to our fans, we owe it to ourselves. "We are upset, we feel we have been badly treated. "Most judgements are not made by three people, they are made by 12 - that's why they are called juries. "I believe if you had gone to the FA Council and asked the 100 members 75% would have said it was not a sending off, but if you just take three people it may not be representative." West Ham are 18th in the Premier League, one point from safety I look forward to FIFA banning West Ham from all football. Don't they have a thing about not involving the courts in footy stuff? dunno about FIFA but every single club signs up to not before each season to the system and not to bring courts into it, frankly I'd hope the rest of the clubs would work together and throw west ham out for trying it. What do they think makes them so special that they can get away with it, every single club had had bad reffing decisions every single club has had appeals go against them when they thought it shouldn't have. None of those have decided to throw their toys out of the pram and go crying over it. Christ its not as even if it was clearly wrong, theres enough in the rules for the incident to be a red despite Flores's crying like a 4 year old girl. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Andy Carroll: West Ham seek legal route over red card West Ham are to take legal action after failing in their appeal to overturn the red card shown to Andy Carroll during the 1 February win against Swansea. The Football Association upheld the decision which means the England striker is now banned for three games. "There is nowhere to go other than to seek some kind of legal redress," said West Ham co-chairman David Gold. Rules allow clubs to take disputes to arbitration and if necessary to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The FA has refused to comment on the latest development. Carroll, 25, was sent off after clashing with Swans defender Chico Flores during his side's 2-0 victory. He will now miss the Premier League games against Aston Villa, Norwich and Southampton. In apparent reaction to the decision, Carroll, who set up both goals tweeted: "Disgraceful." According to the FA, West Ham failed to prove to a three-man panel that referee Howard Webb had made "an obvious error" in dismissing Carroll after the forward's arm hit Flores's forehead. However, West Ham manager Sam Allardyce was certain that Webb made a mistake. "There has to be somebody to look at that in the cold light of day and say that is certainly not a red card," he said after the win. Gold added: "We are hugely disappointed at the outcome of the process. "The last thing I want to do is going to some kind of legal issue because I think it is a footballing issue. "But we are fighting for our lives. If we were mid-table we would probably get on with it but we are fighting for our lives to retain our Premier League status and we owe it to our fans, we owe it to ourselves. "We are upset, we feel we have been badly treated. "Most judgements are not made by three people, they are made by 12 - that's why they are called juries. "I believe if you had gone to the FA Council and asked the 100 members 75% would have said it was not a sending off, but if you just take three people it may not be representative." West Ham are 18th in the Premier League, one point from safety I look forward to FIFA banning West Ham from all football. Don't they have a thing about not involving the courts in footy stuff? dunno about FIFA but every single club signs up to not before each season to the system and not to bring courts into it, frankly I'd hope the rest of the clubs would work together and throw west ham out for trying it. What do they think makes them so special that they can get away with it, every single club had had bad reffing decisions every single club has had appeals go against them when they thought it shouldn't have. None of those have decided to throw their toys out of the pram and go crying over it. Christ its not as even if it was clearly wrong, theres enough in the rules for the incident to be a red despite Flores's crying like a 4 year old girl. Apparently the FA are allowing a personal hearing tomorrow morning. Hope they don't let them off as it will send out the wrong message. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Andy Carroll: West Ham seek legal route over red card West Ham are to take legal action after failing in their appeal to overturn the red card shown to Andy Carroll during the 1 February win against Swansea. The Football Association upheld the decision which means the England striker is now banned for three games. "There is nowhere to go other than to seek some kind of legal redress," said West Ham co-chairman David Gold. Rules allow clubs to take disputes to arbitration and if necessary to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The FA has refused to comment on the latest development. Carroll, 25, was sent off after clashing with Swans defender Chico Flores during his side's 2-0 victory. He will now miss the Premier League games against Aston Villa, Norwich and Southampton. In apparent reaction to the decision, Carroll, who set up both goals tweeted: "Disgraceful." According to the FA, West Ham failed to prove to a three-man panel that referee Howard Webb had made "an obvious error" in dismissing Carroll after the forward's arm hit Flores's forehead. However, West Ham manager Sam Allardyce was certain that Webb made a mistake. "There has to be somebody to look at that in the cold light of day and say that is certainly not a red card," he said after the win. Gold added: "We are hugely disappointed at the outcome of the process. "The last thing I want to do is going to some kind of legal issue because I think it is a footballing issue. "But we are fighting for our lives. If we were mid-table we would probably get on with it but we are fighting for our lives to retain our Premier League status and we owe it to our fans, we owe it to ourselves. "We are upset, we feel we have been badly treated. "Most judgements are not made by three people, they are made by 12 - that's why they are called juries. "I believe if you had gone to the FA Council and asked the 100 members 75% would have said it was not a sending off, but if you just take three people it may not be representative." West Ham are 18th in the Premier League, one point from safety I look forward to FIFA banning West Ham from all football. Don't they have a thing about not involving the courts in footy stuff? dunno about FIFA but every single club signs up to not before each season to the system and not to bring courts into it, frankly I'd hope the rest of the clubs would work together and throw west ham out for trying it. What do they think makes them so special that they can get away with it, every single club had had bad reffing decisions every single club has had appeals go against them when they thought it shouldn't have. None of those have decided to throw their toys out of the pram and go crying over it. Christ its not as even if it was clearly wrong, theres enough in the rules for the incident to be a red despite Flores's crying like a 4 year old girl. Apparently the FA are allowing a personal hearing tomorrow morning. Hope they don't let them off as it will send out the wrong message. not to mention opening the threat of similar action from every single club, it would basically destroy the suspension system as anyone who doesn't want a player banned, just scream loudly and shrilly enough and threaten to go to court and your player will get off scott free! And thats not even taking into account the outrage from other clubs near the bottom if West Ham get away with it really opening themselves to legal action there should West Ham stay up because of a goal from Carroll against Villa Norwich or Southampton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Hopefully someone in the FA has a sense of humour and has only invited West Ham in to waste their time. Don't really see the difference between this and Remy - enough in both to be red, but both a bit harsh and both involved play acting defenders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Darren Lewis @MirrorDarren 8s West Ham have lost their arbitration hearing. More on Mirrorfootball shortly and the fat one has the audacity to claim it was a clear mistake by the ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 It was, to be fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 nope there was enough for a red imho despite Flores playacting much like the Remy incident stupid by the players to give the opportunity to be sent off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 There was nothing unusual about Carroll's arm movement and he was looking for the ball not Flores. Ridiculous sending off tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Course it was. As if that's worthy of a red ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Just can't help but think of this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd65g3hqJrk Best thing that fat headed twat has ever done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 I would literally have battered him if I was Chico there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 I would literally have battered him if I was Chico there. Chico's a cheating coward who couldn't batter a fish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts