Disco Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Just wondering, since RTG have banned mention of it, do you think their posters are reading this instead? Has there been an influx of new members requests that are suspiciously mackemesque? Yes I am I agree with what's being said. Throw the book at him. He's quite clearly not reet in the head. As for Sunderland. If we knew this was coming out and played him anyway, deduct us points. Send us down. Wouldn't put it past Byrne etc. to act this way. Wouldn't be the first time our board have been ridiculous. The two resident mackems on here are great. I work with another Mackem and he's of the same opinion. He can't believe the lack of stick Sunderland have taken for their handling of the situation. I can only assume the papers are waiting 'til the trial is done just in case. It's been oddly quiet from all and sundry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. I don't see what rules Sunderland have broken, morally they are very wrong but it's stupid to suggest they escape punishment when they've broken zero rules or laws. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Kidding yourselves. Nowt will happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sho Time Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. I don't see what rules Sunderland have broken, morally they are very wrong but it's stupid to suggest they escape punishment when they've broken zero rules or laws. This. It all depends on the backlash in the media in which case Byrne will probably be forced to resign and that'll probably be that. Can't even see that happening though tbh - they're a totally irrelevant football club so it may yet just go by without blowing up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Who even cares about them like? If Big Marge stays or goes, does it really matter? Will it effect the team? They've broken no rules to get a deduction or anything, so really - nobody should care less. All they've done is highlight what we already knew before, they're just a sad little club that nobody is bothered about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Ready to Groom, the Chemical Ali of forums 'there are no US tanks in Iraq' are desperately delaying the inevitable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 That place will explode when the trial ends... Guilty: yeah but the mags hit horses, this mag at work, saw a mag on the bus, mag mag mag Not Guilty: yeahh! AJ showing the mags that they talk shit, she said she was 18 and in a nightclub, he only admitted to kissing her for laughs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Horrific developments http://i.imgur.com/D4h90au.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Aye but was she one of those? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stray Mackem Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. Only if what Johnson is saying is true. We only have his word for it so far. We really need a statement from the club, and hopefully the PFA who were also involved in his suspension being lifted. We'll see what happens at the end of the trial. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Next level clickbait. Flat out lie to get traffic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 That's quite the caption. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Tight cunt, making the victim buy her own sweets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Only if what Johnson is saying is true. We only have his word for it so far. We really need a statement from the club, and hopefully the PFA who were also involved in his suspension being lifted. We'll see what happens at the end of the trial. The PFA were instrumental in allowing him to return to training. The PFA didnt shove him into the first team for over a year. Its clear the SAFC board were complicit..... He's got plenty of reasons to lie under oath - this isnt one of them. He denies this and said: “Once I went for the kiss, and I hold my hands up for that, I realised this can’t go any further and stopped.” I'm going to take this at face value i.e. he was giving both her nascent bee-stings a sly rub whilst licking the haribo taste off her tongue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Why is there steam coming off him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Wrong way round Adam FFS.....Worst. Paedo. Ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Why is there steam coming off him? Nonce-vapour iirc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 How can the jury be sure "beyond all doubt" (or whatever the quote is) to give a guilty verdict? I mean, I'm not and I dont see how I would be even if I was in the courtroom throughout the trial. There's literally no evidence. Surely he'll be found not guilty? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hithere Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 That place will explode when the trial ends... Guilty: yeah but the mags hit horses, this mag at work, saw a mag on the bus, mag mag mag Not Guilty: yeahh! AJ showing the mags that they talk s***, she said she was 18 and in a nightclub, he only admitted to kissing her for laughs I'm on RTG I realise your perspective However there are a lot of sensible posters on there who will have a different more intelligent view Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hithere Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. Only if what Johnson is saying is true. We only have his word for it so far. We really need a statement from the club, and hopefully the PFA who were also involved in his suspension being lifted. We'll see what happens at the end of the trial. Also this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hithere Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 How can the jury be sure "beyond all doubt" (or whatever the quote is) to give a guilty verdict? I mean, I'm not and I dont see how I would be even if I was in the courtroom throughout the trial. There's literally no evidence. Surely he'll be found not guilty? From what I gather He needs to be found guilty of touching the poor lass up etc etc Beyond reasonable doubt As some have mentioned he's playing the 'look how honest I am here, you have to believe me when I say I didn't do this part' card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 http://www.sunderland.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=11475 "Bridge Over the River Nonce" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 How can the jury be sure "beyond all doubt" (or whatever the quote is) to give a guilty verdict? I mean, I'm not and I dont see how I would be even if I was in the courtroom throughout the trial. There's literally no evidence. Surely he'll be found not guilty? This is what I've been asking for days. Suppose the jury must just decide who to side with in all these paedophile cases where the only witness is the victim... I honestly don't know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts