STM Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Hope they get loads of damages and the little twat goes bankrupt. Sunderland will have to sack him now. To RTG. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 His lasses mother stuck up for him as well, despite obviously not knowing the truth Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
durhamunigeordie Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 10% credit Yea you're right sorry, had it in my head that 10% was the figure for between first available opportunity and trial. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Is kissing classed as sexual activity? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I'm not having it that Sunderland, his employer, knew nothing of this either. They will have had behind closed door conversations and this will not be a surprise to them. Disgraceful Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Surely the prosecution service will have th throw the book him consdering what's happened with celebrities with the BBC and MP's in Parliament. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Fortunately, the law is not that reactionary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I'm very surprised that he's pleaded guilty, everything else is speculation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Is kissing classed as sexual activity? Not according to Jezza Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Must be in bother. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Fortunately, the law is not that reactionary. Yeah, but it is conceivable that if they find him guilty then the judge will be under pressure to give him the longest sentence as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Must be in bother. Hes in court, of course hes in bother Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 He'll get fuck all, like all footballers. Like Barton? Served 77 days, so yeah. Ched Evans says hai Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I'm very surprised that he's pleaded guilty, everything else is speculation. The evidence must be pretty overwhelming and pleading guilty can lessen the sentence Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Hope they get loads of damages and the little twat goes bankrupt. Sunderland will have to sack him now. To RTG. Deleted threads everywhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Must be in bother. Hes in court, of course hes in bother After his admission. Think you overdo the smilies slightly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Chris Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I find it pretty shocking he's been allowed to play. I'm not just saying that because it's the mackems. If they've known he was going to plead guilty, why the f*** play him? Unless he's been lying to them all the while. Still shouldn't have been playing regardless imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 He changed their game against Liverpool at the weekend and is one of their better players. Good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Hasn't he had one or two previous chances to enter a plea? Yet he denied all charges? Does this count against him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Absolute fucking nonce :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 http://news.sky.com/story/1639383/adam-johnson-pleads-guilty-to-sex-charge Johnson, 28, has admitted to knowing that the girl was under 16. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I find it pretty shocking he's been allowed to play. I'm not just saying that because it's the mackems. If they've known he was going to plead guilty, why the f*** play him? Unless he's been lying to them all the while. Still shouldn't have been playing regardless imo. I think this, as well. You would have thought, they would have tried to get as much information on it as possible? Surely they must have had some idea of the situation and how Johnson was going to plead? I still think all along, he should have been suspended whilst the investigation was on-going. Not just sacking him straight up and deciding he's guilty, or anything like that. But I'm sure there are plenty of other jobs where he would have been suspended. That wouldn't necessarily mean he's done anything wrong. I think sunderland have handled the whole thing terribly. Seems like they kept him in the squad, just so they could stay up. Cunt always scores against us and all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Hasn't he had one or two previous chances to enter a plea? Yet he denied all charges? Does this count against him? Yes it does. If on his first appearance in the Crown Court he had pleaded guilty he would have received a third off. Since this date the amount of credit he gets for pleading guilty reduces over time. A plea on the day of trial ordinarily attracts credit of 10%. I suspect his defence will try to say to the Jury that he is a man who has accepted the things he has done wrong. On face value it's a pretty weak strategy as the Jury will hear that he has pleaded guilty to two sexual offences against the same girl. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dembacha Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I'm not having it that Sunderland, his employer, knew nothing of this either. They will have had behind closed door conversations and this will not be a surprise to them. Disgraceful Maybe he chose not say much to them. He wasn't legally obliged to admit anything. At least I think he wasn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Wonder if there some sort of points 4 paedos scheme we can claim back through? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts