loki679 Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 27 minutes ago, HTT II said: Tactically, fitness etc. the PL today compared to when it first launched is way ahead, but in the 90s England could pick from Shearer, Cole, Sir Les, Ian Wright, Le Tissier, Fowler, Collymore, Sutton, Sheringham, Dublin et al. All of them today would be ahead of perhaps any England striker other than Kane. KK’s 93-96 team would wipe the floor with half the division. It was far more entertaining and competitive back then, more balanced and each team seemed to have a top striker or one capable of getting 15 goals at least. Today if Kane or anyone really gets 15 he’s had a good season. Back then it was the norm. Aye, Dion Dublin was up there with Pele and Maradona Have a word with yourself, man. Collymore, Sutton, Dublin were all good to average strikers but nowt special. Wright, Le Tissier, Cole and Fowler did nob all for England. Just rose tinted glasses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 minute ago, loki679 said: Aye, Dion Dublin was up there with Pele and Maradona Have a word with yourself, man. Collymore, Sutton, Dublin were all good to average strikers but nowt special. Wright, Le Tissier, Cole and Fowler did nob all for England. Just rose tinted glasses. I’m talking about OUR game here in England relating to the 90s to now. Dublin was massively underrated btw, a member of the 100 PL goals club. And they did nowt because we had so many good forwards we couldn’t exactly play them all! Where did I compare them to Pele and Maradona! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 (edited) Oh and Dublin, Sutton and Collymore in their prime and on form would go for silly money today. They would be considered some of the top strikers in the division today. Where as back then, aye talented and handy, but every team seemed to have a Dublin or a Sutton capable of 15 goals or so. Edited June 12, 2022 by HTT II Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 England strikers looked better in the 90s because the league was so much worse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Just now, triggs said: England strikers looked better in the 90s because the league was so much worse More open, less tactical and teams went out to win home or away. I agree overall it was worse, but far more entertaining. Horses for courses… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macphisto Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 5 minutes ago, loki679 said: Aye, Dion Dublin was up there with Pele and Maradona Have a word with yourself, man. Collymore, Sutton, Dublin were all good to average strikers but nowt special. Wright, Le Tissier, Cole and Fowler did nob all for England. Just rose tinted glasses. Is that not because Shearer was playing for England at that time? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 minute ago, HTT II said: Oh and Dublin, Sutton and Collymore in their prime and on form would go for silly money today. They would be considered some of the top strikers in the division today. Where as back then, aye talented and handy, but every team seemed to have a Dublin or a Sutton capable of 15 goals or so. What a load of crap. Dion fucking Dublin the saviour of strikers now They were average then, they'd be average now. You're just getting old, mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, macphisto said: Is that not because Shearer was playing for England at that time? It’s stupid to deny we didn’t have an embarrassment of riches up front and even in other areas at that time. Again, they did nowt because they didn’t feature much because of having a Shearer and a Sheringham for example up front. Edited June 12, 2022 by HTT II Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, loki679 said: What a load of crap. Dion fucking Dublin the saviour of strikers now They were average then, they'd be average now. You're just getting old, mate. Who said they are the saviour of strikers? Put the cheese and tuna down and take a chill pill! Dublin today would be one of the higher rated forwards in the PL man. Edited June 12, 2022 by HTT II Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, HTT II said: More open, less tactical and teams went out to win home or away. I agree overall it was worse, but far more entertaining. Horses for courses… Goals per game in the current PL is higher than it was in the 90s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Just now, Wullie said: Goals per game in the current PL is higher than it was in the 90s. But the strikers… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Just now, Wullie said: Goals per game in the current PL is higher than it was in the 90s. Probably skewered by Pardew and Bruce’s NUFC defence… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 Amazing how the quality of English strikers sunk like a stone just as clubs began to sign loads of foreign players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 58 minutes ago, triggs said: Amazing how the quality of English strikers sunk like a stone just as clubs began to sign loads of foreign players Seems to be the case for most nations though isn't it? Majority of the best attackers recently have been wide forwards or attacking midfielders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 6 minutes ago, Jaqen said: Seems to be the case for most nations though isn't it? Majority of the best attackers recently have been wide forwards or attacking midfielders. That's because most teams don't play 2 up top anymore IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 minute ago, triggs said: That's because most teams don't play 2 up top anymore IMO Or with real wingers! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 3 hours ago, macphisto said: @Kid Icarus @Ken Boon What are you actually referring to when you say a higher standard these days? 100% agree about the improvement in players fitness levels/lifestyles and tactical nous/tactical discipline. I'd also say the role of defenders has changed beyond recognition in how they defend, attack and now have to be far more comfortable on the ball. Likewise, the role of the goalkeeper has also changed dramatically, personified by the video of 80s goalkeepers just whacking the ball down the pitch. I would say though that the improvements above have been offset by the fall in strikers and midfielders. The league winners in Italy, Germany, Spain and England all had main strikers in their mid-30s or in Man City's case often preferred not to play with a striker. I know there has been advances in sports science but for not one of the main league winners to have one main striker in their mid-20s is unusual and doesn't say much about the younger generation of strikers. Midfielders, I'll just use England as one example. Compare England's midfield now to the "golden generation". I've got no time for the "golden generation" but I do have to admit that they're light years ahead of the current midfield. That's absolutely Basil Fawlty at 1:13. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfella Posted June 12, 2022 Share Posted June 12, 2022 2 hours ago, Mike said: That's absolutely Basil Fawlty at 1:13. That's Martin Hodge, here he is showing his inner Fawlty, throttling Colin Clarke. https://images.app.goo.gl/LRLrSuhgsgrByArk9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 19 hours ago, HTT II said: Tactically, fitness etc. the PL today compared to when it first launched is way ahead, but in the 90s England could pick from Shearer, Cole, Sir Les, Ian Wright, Le Tissier, Fowler, Collymore, Sutton, Sheringham, Dublin et al. All of them today would be ahead of perhaps any England striker other than Kane. KK’s 93-96 team would wipe the floor with half the division. It was far more entertaining and competitive back then, more balanced and each team seemed to have a top striker or one capable of getting 15 goals at least. Today if Kane or anyone really gets 15 he’s had a good season. Back then it was the norm. I don't know about that as fun as those times were, English club football was well and truly in the doldrums. For example, when we blew the title in 96, English teams were having probably the worst season they've ever had in European football. Manchester United were knocked out by Rotor Volgograd, Liverpool were knocked out by Brondby, and Blackburn managed to finish bottom of a European Cup (ok, 'Champions League') group containing the might of Spartak Moscow, Legia Warsaw and Rosenberg. And they weren't backs-to-the-wall upsets - they were all deserved. We took 78 points in an utterly shite English top flight. And the 94-95 side would be relegation candidates today IMO - they were pretty woeful after November. Few of those players were getting offers from top European clubs - didn't Shearer say he had offers from Genoa and Samp at a couple of points? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 Being boring here but the whole Grealish/Almiron stuff needs to end. Saw another mention of it this morning on twitter and it’s done now. It should have been finished after he got snapped in a friendly by his international team mate but how frequently it gets brought up now is getting embarrassing. Every time he has a good game or scores there’s some sort of comparison. Stop. I think I’m getting old. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 Nah, it's funny. Even if Grealish ends up overtaking him this season, Almiron is/has embarrassed him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St. Maximin Posted October 23, 2022 Share Posted October 23, 2022 (edited) Personally I think the reaction to it could be a bit patronising to Miggy. Like Grealish is the bully and Miggy is this innocent weak child. Reality is Grealish is just a stupid young man who was hammered and Miggy is still a tough premier league footballer who has shown before he has a bit of shithousery in him (well attempts to cheat actually). Maybe not quite the angelic child he might look. Plus he’s 28 and has probably been called far worse so I imagine he’s not let that get to him too much. However, Grealish has continued to be be terrible while Miggy has been phenomenal since that was posted, plus Grealish is no doubt a massive whopper. So still pretty funny. Edited October 23, 2022 by St. Maximin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Eventually the majority will be sick to the back teeth of Wrexham. It doesn't matter how good something may be, anything that gets this much of the limelight eventually ends up getting on people's nerves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: Eventually the majority will be sick to the back teeth of Wrexham. It doesn't matter how good something may be, anything that gets this much of the limelight eventually ends up getting on people's nerves. Is it really that unpopular? Of course people will be fed up of them, it always happens with the ‘underdog story’. People got fed up of the likes of Wigan when they came up and then stayed there stinking the place out. People are fed up with the likes of Salford who are owned by former Man Utd players and seemingly getting people wishing them well. People got fed up of FC Manchester that was created by Man Utd fans in protest. On bigger scales people got fed up of Chelsea, got fed up of Man City, even got fed up of Arsenal, and before that unless your a fan of these clubs, everyone fucking hates Man Utd and Liverpool. The question about Wrexham is will their ownership change things in our football system? We all know that the National League should be part of the league system. We all know that money needs to be distributed down. We all know that there are decent sized clubs languishing in the lower leagues and non-league. Will the attention they have gained result in change? Will the FA and football authorities expand/change or league system? Will investors come in for the other clubs? Will fans start turning out for those teams. If the answer is no, then their ownership hasn’t been good for football outside of Wrexham. Edited April 28, 2023 by Stifler Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
number37 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 I don't like base layers and I really don't like base layers under striped shirts. Seeing Sheffield United with long sleeves is a thing of beauty, which should be a common, not a rare, thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now